IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i12p1284-d685917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilience and Circularity: Revisiting the Role of Urban Village in Rural-Urban Migration in Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Ran Liu

    (College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, No. 105 West 3rd Ring Road North, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Yuhang Jia

    (College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, No. 105 West 3rd Ring Road North, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

Recent policies in China have encouraged rural-urban circular migration and an “amphibious” and flexible status of settlement, reacting against the recent risks of economic fluctuation in cities. Rural land, as a form of insurance and welfare, can handle random hazards, and the new Land Management Law guarantees that rural migrants who settle in the city can maintain their rights to farmland, homesteads, and a collective income distribution. Existing studies have pointed out that homeland tenure can reduce migrants’ urban settlement intentions (which is a self-reported subjective perception of city life). However, little is known about how the rural-urban circularity and rural tenure system (especially for those still holding hometown lands in the countryside) affect rural migrants’ temporary urban settlements (especially for those preferring to stay in informal communities in the host city). The existing studies on the urban villages in China have focused only on the side of the receiving cities, but have rarely mentioned the other side of this process, focusing on migrants’ rural land tenure issues in their hometowns. This study discusses the rationale of informality (the urban village) and attests to whether, and to what extent, rural migrants’ retention of their hometown lands can affect their tenure security choices (urban village or not) in Chinese metropolises such as Beijing. Binary logistic regression was conducted and the data analysis proved that rural migrants who kept their hometown lands, compared to their land-loss counterparts, were more likely to live in a Beijing urban village. This displays the resilience and circularity of rural-urban migration in China, wherein the rural migrant households demonstrate the “micro-family economy”, maintaining tenure security in their hometown and avoiding the dissipation of their family income in their destination. The Discussion and Conclusions sections of this paper refer to some policy implications related to maintaining the rural-urban dual system, protecting rural migrant land rights, and beefing up the “opportunity structure” (including maintaining the low-rent areas in metropolises such as Beijing) in the 14th Five Year Plan period.

Suggested Citation

  • Ran Liu & Yuhang Jia, 2021. "Resilience and Circularity: Revisiting the Role of Urban Village in Rural-Urban Migration in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:12:p:1284-:d:685917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/12/1284/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/12/1284/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stark, Oded & Bloom, David E, 1985. "The New Economics of Labor Migration," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(2), pages 173-178, May.
    2. Hyun Bang Shin, 2014. "Contesting speculative urbanisation and strategising discontents," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4-5), pages 509-516, October.
    3. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Land use change and driving factors in rural China during the period 1995-2015," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Fulong Wu, 2016. "Housing in Chinese Urban Villages: The Dwellers, Conditions and Tenancy Informality," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 852-870, October.
    5. Shin, Hyun Bang, 2014. "Contesting speculative urbanisation and strategising discontents," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59608, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Shenjing He & Ying Chang, 2020. "A zone of exception? Interrogating the hybrid housing regime and nested enclaves in China-Singapore Suzhou-Industrial-Park," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 592-616, September.
    7. Grabel, Ilene, 2000. "The Political Economy of 'Policy Credibility': The New-Classical Macroeconomics and the Remaking of Emerging Economies," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 24(1), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Shin, Hyun Bang & Li, Bingqin, 2013. "Whose games? The costs of being 'Olympic citizens' in Beijing," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 52676, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Liz Alden Wily, 2018. "Collective Land Ownership in the 21st Century: Overview of Global Trends," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-26, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wanqing Wei & Li Zhang, 2024. "The influence of enterprise dormitories on the urban integration of migrant workers in China: an exploration of two distinct migration stages of individual and family migration and the differences bet," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Wentao Si & Chen Jiang & Lin Meng, 2022. "Leaving the Homestead: Examining the Role of Relative Deprivation, Social Trust, and Urban Integration among Rural Farmers in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Li Tao & Xiaoyan Lei & Wentan Guo & Victor Jing Li & Min Cheng, 2022. "To Settle Down, or Not? Evaluating the Policy Effects of Talent Housing in Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Min Li & Apurbo Sarkar & Yuge Wang & Ahmed Khairul Hasan & Quanxing Meng, 2022. "Evaluating the Impact of Ecological Property Rights to Trigger Farmers’ Investment Behavior—An Example of Confluence Area of Heihe Reservoir, Shaanxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ran Liu, 2022. "Incomplete Urbanization and the Trans-Local Rural-Urban Gradient in China: From a Perspective of New Economics of Labor Migration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Emma Colven, 2023. "A political ecology of speculative urbanism: The role of financial and environmental speculation in Jakarta’s water crisis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(2), pages 490-510, March.
    3. Feng, Yi & Wu, Fulong & Zhang, Fangzhu, 2022. "The development of local government financial vehicles in China: A case study of Jiaxing Chengtou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Bin Li & Kaihan Yang & Konstantin E. Axenov & Long Zhou & Huiming Liu, 2022. "Trade-Offs, Adaptation and Adaptive Governance of Urban Regeneration in Guangzhou, China (2009–2019)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Hyun Bang Shin & Loretta Lees & Ernesto López-Morales, 2016. "Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 455-470, February.
    6. Hyun Bang Shin & Soo-Hyun Kim, 2016. "The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 540-559, February.
    7. Melissa Wilson & Bob Catterall, 2015. "City 's holistic and cumulative project (1996-2016): (1) Then and now: 'It all comes together in Los Angeles?'," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 131-142, February.
    8. Zhao Zhang & Niamh Moore-Cherry & Declan Redmond, 2018. "A Crisis of Crisis Management? Evaluating Post-2010 Housing Restructuring in Nanjing, China," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 29-49, January.
    9. Karina Acosta & Hengyu Gu, 2022. "Locked up? The development and internal migration nexus in Colombia," Documentos de Trabajo Sobre Economía Regional y Urbana 19931, Banco de la República, Economía Regional.
    10. Atsede Desta Tegegne & Marianne Penker, 2016. "Determinants of rural out-migration in Ethiopia: Who stays and who goes?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(34), pages 1011-1044.
    11. Maxmillan Martin & Yi hyun Kang & Motasim Billah & Tasneem Siddiqui & Richard Black & Dominic Kniveton, 2017. "Climate-influenced migration in Bangladesh: The need for a policy realignment," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 357-379, October.
    12. Tineke Fokkema & Eralba Cela & Elena Ambrosetti, 2013. "Giving from the Heart or from the Ego? Motives behind Remittances of the Second Generation in Europe," International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 539-572, September.
    13. Stark, Oded, 2021. "Reexamining the influence of conditional cash transfers on migration from a gendered lens: Comment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58(1), pages 379-381.
    14. Driouchi, Ahmed & Zouag, Nada, 2010. "Internal Mobility and Likelihood of Skill Losses in Localities of Emigration: Theory and Preliminary Empirical Application to Some Developing Economies," MPRA Paper 21799, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Apr 2010.
    15. de Arce, Rafael & Mahia, Ramon, 2008. "Determinants of Bilateral Immigration Flows Between The European Union and some Mediterranean Partner Countries: Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia and Turkey," MPRA Paper 14547, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Weijia Chen & Yongquan Lu & Guilin Liu, 2022. "Balancing cropland gain and desert vegetation loss: The key to rural revitalization in Xinjiang, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1122-1145, September.
    17. Kuckulenz, Anja & Buch, Claudia M., 2004. "Worker Remittances and Capital Flows to Developing Countries," ZEW Discussion Papers 04-31, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Ana María Ibá-ez, 2014. "Growth in forced displacement: cross-country, sub-national and household evidence on potential determinants," Chapters, in: Robert E.B. Lucas (ed.), International Handbook on Migration and Economic Development, chapter 13, pages 350-387, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Nil Demet Gungor & Aysıt Tansel, 2008. "Brain drain from Turkey: an investigation of students' return intentions," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(23), pages 3069-3087.
    20. Wadjidou Boukari & Fenjie Long & Imorou Abdou-Latif, 2025. "Can affordable housing supply exclusively stop urban sprawl?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 8317-8355, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:12:p:1284-:d:685917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.