Global Risk Factors and Their Impacts on Interest and Exchange Rates: Evidence from ASEAN+4 Economies

This paper revisits the international finance trilemma by analyzing how different monetary policy objectives and exchange rate regimes shape the transmission of global risk shocks. Using a structural vector autoregressive model with exogenous variables (SVARX), we examine the monetary policy responses and exchange rate fluctuations of ASEAN+4 economies—China, Japan, Korea, and Hong Kong—to external shocks including U.S. monetary policy changes, oil price fluctuations, global policy uncertainty, and financial risk during 2010–2022. Economies are grouped according to their trilemma configurations: floating exchange rates with free capital flows, fixed exchange rates, and capital control regimes. Our findings broadly support the trilemma hypothesis: fixed-rate economies align with U.S. interest rate movements, capital control economies retain greater monetary autonomy, and open, floating regimes show partial responsiveness. More importantly, monetary responses vary by global shock type: U.S. monetary policy drives the most synchronized policy reactions, while oil price and uncertainty shocks produce more heterogeneous outcomes. Robustness checks include alternative model specifications, where global shocks are treated as endogenous, and extensions, such as using Japan’s monetary base as a proxy for unconventional monetary policy. These results refine the empirical understanding of the trilemma by showing that its dynamics depend not only on institutional arrangements but also on the nature of global shocks—underscoring the need for more tailored and, where possible, regionally coordinated monetary policy strategies.