IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i5p282-d1658985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Asset Pricing Models for Green, Grey, and Red EU Securities: A Fama–French and Carhart Model Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ferdinantos Kottas

    (School of Business, National University of Ireland Maynooth, W23 F2H6 Maynooth, Ireland
    Credit Bureau, Creditinfo, 18600 Prague, Czech Republic
    Financial Mathematics & Computational Research Cluster, A94 XF34 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

This study examines the explainability, validity, and applicability of multi-factor models in explaining the returns of Green (eco-friendly), Grey (neutral), and Red (environmentally harmful) EU securities. We apply the Fama–French three-factor and five-factor models, along with the Carhart four-factor model, to analyze changes in risk exposures and adjusted abnormal returns (alphas) before and after the 2009 global financial crisis (GFC). Green and Grey securities exhibit positive SMB loadings, while Grey’s HML shifts from negative to positive over time. Both Green and Red securities show positive SMB and HML factors but negative alphas in the second period, indicating systematic underperformance. Additionally, for Red assets, momentum (MOM), profitability (RMW), and investment (CMA) factors are positive and significant in the first period but become insignificant or negative later. These findings highlight structural shifts in factor exposures and contribute to the ongoing debate on the most suitable classical asset pricing framework for environmentally classified assets, offering insights into the effectiveness of traditional factor models in different classes of environmental assets in finance. Lastly, the three-factor model better captures the common variation in Green and Grey asset returns. Specifically, the 4-factor model and the HML Devil factor prove to be more effective in explaining returns for Red securities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferdinantos Kottas, 2025. "Empirical Asset Pricing Models for Green, Grey, and Red EU Securities: A Fama–French and Carhart Model Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-28, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:282-:d:1658985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cojoianu, Theodor F. & Clark, Gordon L. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Veneri, Paolo & Wójcik, Dariusz, 2020. "Entrepreneurs for a low carbon world: How environmental knowledge and policy shape the creation and financing of green start-ups," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    2. Bolton, Patrick & Kacperczyk, Marcin, 2021. "Do investors care about carbon risk?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 517-549.
    3. Pástor, Ľuboš & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Taylor, Lucian A., 2021. "Sustainable investing in equilibrium," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 550-571.
    4. Pástor, Ľuboš & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Taylor, Lucian A., 2022. "Dissecting green returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 403-424.
    5. Guo, Bin & Zhang, Wei & Zhang, Yongjie & Zhang, Han, 2017. "The five-factor asset pricing model tests for the Chinese stock market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 84-106.
    6. Taufiq Choudhry, 2002. "The Stochastic Structure of the Time–Varying Beta: Evidence from UK Companies," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 70(6), pages 768-791, December.
    7. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1996. "Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 51(1), pages 55-84, March.
    8. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    9. Carhart, Mark M, 1997. "On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 57-82, March.
    10. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1995. "Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 50(1), pages 131-155, March.
    11. Arellano, Manuel, 2003. "Panel Data Econometrics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199245291, Decembrie.
    12. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
    13. Söhnke M. Bartram & Harald Lohre & Peter F. Pope & Ananthalakshmi Ranganathan, 2021. "Navigating the factor zoo around the world: an institutional investor perspective," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(5), pages 655-703, July.
    14. repec:bla:manchs:v:70:y:2002:i:6:p:768-91 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Philipp Dirkx & Franziska J. Peter, 2020. "The Fama-French Five-Factor Model Plus Momentum: Evidence for the German Market," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 661-684, October.
    16. Jegadeesh, Narasimhan & Noh, Joonki & Pukthuanthong, Kuntara & Roll, Richard & Wang, Junbo, 2019. "Empirical tests of asset pricing models with individual assets: Resolving the errors-in-variables bias in risk premium estimation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 273-298.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lars Hornuf & Gül Yüksel, 2022. "The Performance of Socially Responsible Investments: A Meta-Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 9724, CESifo.
    2. Ciciretti, Rocco & Dalò, Ambrogio & Dam, Lammertjan, 2023. "The contributions of betas versus characteristics to the ESG premium," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 104-124.
    3. Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Chasing the ESG factor," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Ricardo Gimeno & Clara I. González, 2022. "The role of a green factor in stock prices. When Fama & French go green," Working Papers 2207, Banco de España.
    5. Alona Bilokha & Mingying Cheng & Mengchuan Fu & Iftekhar Hasan, 2025. "Understanding CSR champions: a machine learning approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 347(1), pages 761-774, April.
    6. Alessi, Lucia & Ossola, Elisa & Panzica, Roberto, 2023. "When do investors go green? Evidence from a time-varying asset-pricing model," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Avramov, Doron & Cheng, Si & Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 642-664.
    8. Khalfaoui, Rabeh & Mefteh-Wali, Salma & Viviani, Jean-Laurent & Ben Jabeur, Sami & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Lucey, Brian M., 2022. "How do climate risk and clean energy spillovers, and uncertainty affect U.S. stock markets?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    9. Solène Collot & Tobias Hemauer, 2021. "A literature review of new methods in empirical asset pricing: omitted-variable and errors-in-variable bias," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 35(1), pages 77-100, March.
    10. Marcelo Ochoa & Matthias Paustian & Laura Wilcox, 2022. "Do Sustainable Investment Strategies Hedge Climate Change Risks? Evidence from Germany's Carbon Tax," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2022-073, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    11. Venturini, Alessio, 2022. "Climate change, risk factors and stock returns: A review of the literature," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. John H. Cochrane, 1999. "New facts in finance," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 23(Q III), pages 36-58.
    13. Cortez, Maria Céu & Andrade, Nuno & Silva, Florinda, 2022. "The environmental and financial performance of green energy investments: European evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Alexandros Kontonikas & Alexandros Kostakis, 2013. "On Monetary Policy and Stock Market Anomalies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(7-8), pages 1009-1042, September.
    15. Brav, Alon & Geczy, Christopher & Gompers, Paul A., 2000. "Is the abnormal return following equity issuances anomalous?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 209-249, May.
    16. Aineas Mallios & Taylan Mavruk, 2025. "Do ESG funds engage in portfolio pumping to gain higher flows? An application of Benford's Law," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 1540-1563, April.
    17. Fernando Rubio, 2005. "Estrategias Cuantitativas De Valor Y Retornos Por Accion De Largo," Finance 0503029, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Walkshäusl, Christian, 2015. "Equity financing activities and European value-growth returns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 27-40.
    19. Pástor, Ľuboš & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Taylor, Lucian A., 2022. "Dissecting green returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 403-424.
    20. Daniel, Kent & Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2002. "Investor psychology in capital markets: evidence and policy implications," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 139-209, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:282-:d:1658985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.