IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i4p200-d1629779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Project Description in the Success of Sustainable Crowdfunding Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Li-Yun Yin

    (TIAS School for Business and Society, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Fleur C. Khalil

    (Business School, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Kaslik, Jounieh P.O. Box 446, Lebanon
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lionel J. Khalil

    (TIAS School for Business and Society, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands)

  • Jeanne A. Kaspard

    (Business School, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Kaslik, Jounieh P.O. Box 446, Lebanon)

Abstract

Crowdfunding nowadays has become a significant source of financing for all those entrepreneurs who require funds to start their operations, specifically for social ventures. Furthermore, determining what factors decide whether a project will successfully raise funds is a very relevant question. Past literature has examined various factors that influence fundraising success. Of these factors, information efficiency is the determinant of successful fundraising due to precise project descriptions and effective message delivery. Despite this fact, few studies have investigated how such project descriptions affect the success of crowdfunding campaigns, specifically sustainable projects. The present study tries to fill this gap by examining the relation between the length and readability of the crowdfunding project descriptions and the success rate for sustainable projects in a reward-based model. For the analysis, data were obtained from Kickstarter, the largest crowdfunding platform in the world, with a sample of 12,613 projects, employing a multiple logistic regression model. The results show that the word count and readability of the project descriptions are positively related to crowdfunding success. Furthermore, the analysis shows that using more words related to SDG keywords results in positive fundraising. Such insights reflect that good project descriptions are important for crowdfunding success and, on the theoretical level, provide practical value for project owners.

Suggested Citation

  • Li-Yun Yin & Fleur C. Khalil & Lionel J. Khalil & Jeanne A. Kaspard, 2025. "The Role of Project Description in the Success of Sustainable Crowdfunding Projects," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:200-:d:1629779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/4/200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/4/200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Massimo G. Colombo & Chiara Franzoni & Cristina Rossi–Lamastra, 2015. "Internal Social Capital and the Attraction of Early Contributions in Crowdfunding," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(1), pages 75-100, January.
    2. Douglas J. Cumming & Gaël Leboeuf & Armin Schwienbacher, 2020. "Crowdfunding models: Keep‐It‐All vs. All‐Or‐Nothing," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 49(2), pages 331-360, June.
    3. Lagazio, Corrado & Querci, Francesca, 2018. "Exploring the multi-sided nature of crowdfunding campaign success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 318-324.
    4. Li, Feng, 2008. "Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 221-247, August.
    5. Scheaf, David J. & Davis, Blakley C. & Webb, Justin W. & Coombs, Joseph E. & Borns, Jared & Holloway, Garrett, 2018. "Signals' flexibility and interaction with visual cues: Insights from crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 720-741.
    6. Mollick, Ethan, 2014. "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    7. Thomas H. Allison & Blakley C. Davis & Jeremy C. Short & Justin W. Webb, 2015. "Crowdfunding in a Prosocial Microlending Environment: Examining the Role of Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Cues," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(1), pages 53-73, January.
    8. Lorenzo Gai & Carmelo Algeri & Federica Ielasi & Maria Manganiello, 2025. "Sustainability-Oriented Equity Crowdfunding: The Role of Proponents, Investors, and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Alan Tomczak & Alexander Brem, 2013. "A conceptualized investment model of crowdfunding," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 335-359, October.
    10. Alexa Böckel & Jacob Hörisch & Isabell Tenner, 2021. "A systematic literature review of crowdfunding and sustainability: highlighting what really matters," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 433-453, April.
    11. Frank Martin Belz & Julia Katharina Binder, 2017. "Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Convergent Process Model," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Ye Liu & Ke Zhang & Weili Xue & Ziyu Zhou, 2024. "Crowdfunding innovative but risky new ventures: the importance of less ambiguous tone," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-43, December.
    13. Tanja Jovanović, 2019. "Crowdfunding: What Do We Know So Far?," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Vismara, Silvio, 2019. "Sustainability in equity crowdfunding," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 98-106.
    15. Myung Ja Kim & C. Michael Hall & Heejeong Han, 2021. "Behavioral Influences on Crowdfunding SDG Initiatives: The Importance of Personality and Subjective Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Brown, Terrence E. & Boon, Edward & Pitt, Leyland F., 2017. "Seeking funding in order to sell: Crowdfunding as a marketing tool," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 189-195.
    17. Goran Calic & Elaine Mosakowski, 2016. "Kicking Off Social Entrepreneurship: How A Sustainability Orientation Influences Crowdfunding Success," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 738-767, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaobei Liang & Xiaojuan Hu & Jiang Jiang, 2020. "Research on the Effects of Information Description on Crowdfunding Success within a Sustainable Economy—The Perspective of Information Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-36, January.
    2. Berns, John P. & Jia, Yankun & Gondo, Maria, 2022. "Crowdfunding success in sustainability-oriented projects: An exploratory examination of the crowdfunding of 3D printers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Sven Siebeneicher & Ilker Yenice & Carolin Bock, 2022. "Financial-Return Crowdfunding for Energy and Sustainability in the German-Speaking Realm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Stefania Testa & Paolo Roma & Maria Vasi & Silvano Cincotti, 2020. "Crowdfunding as a tool to support sustainability‐oriented initiatives: Preliminary insights into the role of product/service attributes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 530-546, February.
    5. Kristian Roed Nielsen & Julia Katharina Binder, 2021. "I Am What I Pledge: The Importance of Value Alignment for Mobilizing Backers in Reward-Based Crowdfunding," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(3), pages 531-561, May.
    6. Constantin von Selasinsky & Eva Lutz, 2021. "The Effects of Pro-Social and Pro-Environmental Orientation on Crowdfunding Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, May.
    7. Carolin Bock & Sven Siebeneicher & Jens Rockel, 2022. "The “C” in crowdfunding is for co-financing: exploring participative co-financing, a complement of novel and traditional bank financing," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(9), pages 1559-1602, November.
    8. Swati Oberoi & Rohit Joshi & Atul Mehta & Smita Srivastava & Vishal K. Gupta, 2024. "Crowdfunding Research: Critical Analysis and Constructive Agenda for Future Inquiry," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 33(3), pages 651-699, August.
    9. Chan, Ho Fai & Moy, Naomi & Schaffner, Markus & Torgler, Benno, 2021. "The effects of money saliency and sustainability orientation on reward based crowdfunding success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 443-455.
    10. Alsagr, Naif & Cumming, Douglas J. & Davis, Justin G. & Sewaid, Ahmed, 2023. "Geopolitical risk and crowdfunding performance," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Ke Zhao & Hongwei Wang & Xicheng Yin, 2023. "How women entrepreneurs influence reward-based crowdfunding performance: The mediating role of social and economic value orientation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1771-1802, December.
    12. Saurav Chandra Talukder & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Exploring the Landscape of Social Entrepreneurship and Crowdfunding: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Tanja Jovanović, 2019. "Crowdfunding: What Do We Know So Far?," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Bade, Marco & Reichenbach, Felix, 2025. "Which sustainable development goals favor crowdfunding success?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Shuangfa Huang & David Pickernell & Martina Battisti & Thang Nguyen, 2022. "Signalling entrepreneurs’ credibility and project quality for crowdfunding success: cases from the Kickstarter and Indiegogo environments," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1801-1821, April.
    16. Hörisch, Jacob & Tenner, Isabell, 2020. "How environmental and social orientations influence the funding success of investment-based crowdfunding: The mediating role of the number of funders and the average funding amount," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Felipe, Israel José dos Santos & Mendes-Da-Silva, Wesley & Leal, Cristiana Cerqueira & Braun Santos, Danilo, 2022. "Reward crowdfunding campaigns: Time-to-success analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 214-228.
    18. Christian Handke & Carolina Dalla Chiesa, 2022. "The art of crowdfunding arts and innovation: the cultural economic perspective," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(2), pages 249-284, June.
    19. Bagheri, Afsaneh & Chitsazan, Hasti & Ebrahimi, Ashkan, 2019. "Crowdfunding motivations: A focus on donors' perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 218-232.
    20. Yasar, Burze & Sevilay Yılmaz, Işıl & Hatipoğlu, Nurullah & Salih, Aslıhan, 2022. "Stretching the success in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 205-220.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:200-:d:1629779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.