IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i7p311-d863792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Technology and Its Impact on Digital Literacy in India: Using Poverty as a Moderating Variable

Author

Listed:
  • Rahul Singh Gautam

    (Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune 412115, India)

  • Shailesh Rastogi

    (Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune 412115, India)

  • Aashi Rawal

    (Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune 412115, India)

  • Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu

    (Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune 412115, India)

  • Jagjeevan Kanoujiya

    (Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune 412115, India)

  • Samaksh Rastogi

    (Chartered Accountant & Certified Public Accountant (Australia), Managing Partner, Rastogi and Co Chartered Accountants, Navi Mumbai 400703, India)

Abstract

Financial technology is a powerful tool in financial infrastructure, used to strengthen and smooth the delivery of financial services into the broader space. Financial technology involves software , applications, and other technologies designed to improve and automate traditional forms of financial services for businesses established in different areas. The authors aimed to explore the impact of financial technology on the digital literacy rate in India, by utilizing the poverty score as a moderating variable. The panel data analysis (PDA) has been employed in the current study. Data from 29 states and two union territories (UTs) of India were considered for three financial years, i.e., 2017–2018 to 2019–2020. The study’s findings reveal that Kisan Credit Cards (KCCs), both in terms of numbers and amount, are positively associated with the literacy rate. However, ATMs are negatively significant in association with literacy rate. Furthermore, the study’s empirical results show that KCCs and ATMs positively impact literacy when interacting with poverty scores. The study’s findings bring noteworthy implications for the government and other officials to understand the situation at the ground level of Indian states and UTs while forming new rules and policies for society’s betterment, particularly in finance and digital literacy. Additionally, the findings imply that ordinary people living in urban and rural areas of India should take advantage of financial technology and get motivated towards digital literacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahul Singh Gautam & Shailesh Rastogi & Aashi Rawal & Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu & Jagjeevan Kanoujiya & Samaksh Rastogi, 2022. "Financial Technology and Its Impact on Digital Literacy in India: Using Poverty as a Moderating Variable," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:311-:d:863792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/7/311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/7/311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gozgor, Giray & Lau, Chi Keung Marco & Lu, Zhou, 2018. "Energy consumption and economic growth: New evidence from the OECD countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 27-34.
    2. Lu, Xun & White, Halbert, 2014. "Robustness checks and robustness tests in applied economics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P1), pages 194-206.
    3. Georgios A. Panos & John O. S. Wilson, 2020. "Financial literacy and responsible finance in the FinTech era: capabilities and challenges," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4-5), pages 297-301, March.
    4. Lee, In & Shin, Yong Jae, 2018. "Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 35-46.
    5. Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis, 2018. "Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 7-25.
    6. Badi H. Baltagi, 2021. "Econometric Analysis of Panel Data," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, edition 6, number 978-3-030-53953-5, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Shahnawaz Khan & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2020. "FinTech, Blockchain and Islamic Finance: An Extensive Literature Review," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 65-86.
    2. Baomin Chen & Xinyun Yang & Zhenzhong Ma, 2022. "Fintech and Financial Risks of Systemically Important Commercial Banks in China: An Inverted U-Shaped Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Lambert Kofi Osei & Yuliya Cherkasova & Kofi Mintah Oware, 2023. "Unlocking the full potential of digital transformation in banking: a bibliometric review and emerging trend," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Tianlei Pi & Haoxuan Hu & Jingyi Lu & Xue Chen, 2022. "The Analysis of Fintech Risks in China: Based on Fuzzy Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Hiranya Dissanayake & Catalin Popescu & Anuradha Iddagoda, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Financial Technology: Unveiling the Research Landscape," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Pacelli, Vincenzo & Miglietta, Federica & Foglia, Matteo, 2022. "The extreme risk connectedness of the new financial system: European evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. E.V. Popov & Zh. Omonov & D.B. Schulgin, 2020. "Institutional Factors in the Development of Financial Technologies in Russia," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 19(4), pages 585-604.
    8. Péter Fáykiss & Lívia Ónozó, 2020. "Analysis of the Export Activity of Hungarian FinTech Companies," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 19(4), pages 60-82.
    9. Ahmet F. Aysan & Zhamal Nanaeva, 2022. "Fintech as a Financial Disruptor: A Bibliometric Analysis," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Tadiwanashe Muganyi & Linnan Yan & Yingkai Yin & Huaping Sun & Xiangbin Gong & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2022. "Fintech, regtech, and financial development: evidence from China," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Raymond Kwong & Man Lung Jonathan Kwok & Helen S. M. Wong, 2023. "Green FinTech Innovation as a Future Research Direction: A Bibliometric Analysis on Green Finance and FinTech," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Zhang, Yujin & Ye, Shujun & Liu, Jie & Du, Lihong, 2023. "Impact of the development of FinTech by commercial banks on bank credit risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    13. Ahmad Alaassar & Anne-Laure Mention & Tor Helge Aas, 2022. "Ecosystem dynamics: exploring the interplay within fintech entrepreneurial ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 2157-2182, April.
    14. Fasano, Francesco & Cappa, Francesco, 2022. "How do banking fintech services affect SME debt?," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    15. Yuying Gao & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "Corporate Nature, Financial Technology, and Corporate Innovation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Md. Morshadul Hasan & Lu Yajuan & Appel Mahmud, 2020. "Regional Development of China’s Inclusive Finance Through Financial Technology," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, February.
    17. Abbasi, Kaleemullah & Alam, Ashraful & Du, Min (Anna) & Huynh, Toan Luu Duc, 2021. "FinTech, SME efficiency and national culture: Evidence from OECD countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    18. Luo, Sumei & Sun, Yongkun & Yang, Fan & Zhou, Guangyou, 2022. "Does fintech innovation promote enterprise transformation? Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Payam Hanafizadeh & Mojdeh Gerami Amin, 2023. "The transformative potential of banking service domains with the emergence of FinTechs," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 411-447, September.
    20. Li, Jianping & Li, Jingyu & Zhu, Xiaoqian & Yao, Yinhong & Casu, Barbara, 2020. "Risk spillovers between FinTech and traditional financial institutions: Evidence from the U.S," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:311-:d:863792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.