IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i2p72-d746163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board Information Technology Governance Mechanisms and Firm Performance among Iraqi Medium-Sized Enterprises: Do IT Capabilities Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Ibrahim M. Menshawy

    (Faculty of Commerce, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt)

  • Rohaida Basiruddin

    (Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia)

  • Raihana Mohdali

    (Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia)

  • Nazahan Qahatan

    (Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia
    Federal Board of Supreme Audit, Baghdad 10003, Iraq)

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the perceptions of Iraqi medium-sized enterprises’ board members on how board information technology governance mechanisms affect their companies’ performance with the help of IT capabilities as a mediator. The study is based on a survey of 223 board members using a stratified random sampling technique. The Structural Equation Model (SEM) method results show that board IT governance structure and board IT governance relational have a significant direct and indirect positive relationship with firm performance through IT capabilities. Contrariwise, IT capabilities do not interfere with the relationship between board IT governance processes mechanisms and firm performance. Our study contributes to the IT business literature by addressing new relationships and providing empirical evidence that explains the inconsistent and mixed results of prior studies. Moreover, it extends and complements these prior studies by considering three board IT governance mechanisms, four IT capabilities, and merges the two dimensions of firm performance in a developing country that offers different institutional settings and litigation environment. The study findings offer notable implications for business practitioners and industry leaders to enhance the IT environment and maximize their corporate outcomes. In addition, these findings draw the attention of the board members, management, and corporate general assemblies to recognize the importance of intensifying the investment in IT capabilities to gain superior firm performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibrahim M. Menshawy & Rohaida Basiruddin & Raihana Mohdali & Nazahan Qahatan, 2022. "Board Information Technology Governance Mechanisms and Firm Performance among Iraqi Medium-Sized Enterprises: Do IT Capabilities Matter?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:72-:d:746163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/2/72/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/2/72/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hao, Shengbin & Song, Michael, 2016. "Technology-driven strategy and firm performance: Are strategic capabilities missing links?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 751-759.
    2. Turel, Ofir & Liu, Peng & Bart, Chris, 2019. "Is board IT governance a silver bullet? A capability complementarity and shaping view," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 32-46.
    3. Allam Hamdan & Reem Khamis & Mohammed Anasweh & Mukhtar Al-Hashimi & Anjum Razzaque, 2019. "IT Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Study From Saudi Arabia," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    4. Syaiful Ali & Peter Green, 2012. "Effective information technology (IT) governance mechanisms: An IT outsourcing perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 179-193, April.
    5. Luliya Teeratansirikool & Sununta Siengthai & Yuosre Badir & Chotchai Charoenngam, 2013. "Competitive strategies and firm performance: the mediating role of performance measurement," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 62(2), pages 168-184, January.
    6. Constance E. Helfat, 1997. "Know‐how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: the case of r&d," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 339-360, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harman Preet Singh & Hilal Nafil Alhulail, 2023. "Information Technology Governance and Corporate Boards’ Relationship with Companies’ Performance and Earnings Management: A Longitudinal Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen, Jie & Xie, Zongxiao & Dong, Kunxiang, 2021. "Impact of IT governance mechanisms on organizational agility and the role of top management support and IT ambidexterity," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    2. Harman Preet Singh & Hilal Nafil Alhulail, 2023. "Information Technology Governance and Corporate Boards’ Relationship with Companies’ Performance and Earnings Management: A Longitudinal Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Shaikh, Ibrahim A. & O'Brien, Jonathan Paul & Peters, Lois, 2018. "Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 192-201.
    4. Dwibedy, Punyashlok, 2022. "Informal competition and product innovation decisions of new ventures and incumbents across developing and transitioning countries," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    5. Alhamzah Alnoor & Khai Wah Khaw & XinYing Chew & Sammar Abbas & Zeeshan Zaib Khattak, 2023. "The Influence of the Barriers of Hybrid Strategy on Strategic Competitive Priorities: Evidence from Oil Companies," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 179-198, June.
    6. Nuraddeen Abubakar Nuhu & Kevin Baird & Sophia Su, 2022. "The association between the interactive and diagnostic use of financial and non-financial performance measures with individual creativity: The mediating role of perceived fairness," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 371-402, September.
    7. Malen, Joel, 2015. "Motivating And Enabling Firm Innovation Effort: Integrating Penrosian And Behavioral Theory Perspectives On Slack Resources," Hitotsubashi Journal of commerce and management, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 49(1), pages 37-54, October.
    8. Grimpe, Christoph & Kaiser, Ulrich & Sofka, Wolfgang, 2018. "Innovating for the Better? The Role of Advocacy Group Work Experience for Employee Pay," IZA Discussion Papers 11649, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Fouad Amiri & Sietse Overbeek & Gerard Wagenaar & Christoph Johann Stettina, 2021. "Reconciling agile frameworks with IT sourcing through an IT sourcing dimensions map and structured decision-making," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1113-1142, December.
    10. Malik, Omar R., 2008. "Adapting to market liberalization: The role of dynamic capabilities, initial resource conditions, and strategic path choices in determining evolutionary fitness of Less Developed Country (LDC) firms," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 217-231, September.
    11. Anoop R. Menon & Dennis A. Yao, 2017. "Elevating Repositioning Costs: Strategy Dynamics and Competitive Interactions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(10), pages 1953-1963, October.
    12. Haili Zhang & Yufan Wang & Michael Song, 2019. "Does Competitive Intensity Moderate the Relationships between Sustainable Capabilities and Sustainable Organizational Performance in New Ventures?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Andrew A. King & Christopher L. Tucci, 2002. "Incumbent Entry into New Market Niches: The Role of Experience and Managerial Choice in the Creation of Dynamic Capabilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 171-186, February.
    14. Isabelle Le Breton-Miller & Danny Miller, 2015. "The paradox of resource vulnerability: Considerations for organizational curatorship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 397-415, March.
    15. Hans van Kranenburg & Gerrit Willem Ziggers, 2013. "Dynamic competition and ambidexterity," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse & Christian Handke (ed.), Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy, chapter 6, pages 57-66, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Ariani, Mintarti & Maharani, Raden Roro Irfani, 2018. "Entrepreneurial orientation dan pricing capability," OSF Preprints qek96, Center for Open Science.
    17. Gonzalez, Reyes & Gasco, Jose & Llopis, Juan, 2016. "Information systems contracts and relationships: A Spanish perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1696-1700.
    18. Kumar, V. & Ramachandran, Divya & Kumar, Binay, 2021. "Influence of new-age technologies on marketing: A research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 864-877.
    19. Nicolov Mirela, 2012. "Regional Analysis Of Financial Resources Involved In Research Development And Innovation (Rdi) Sector In Romania In The Last Decade '"Study Done On Macroregions," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 250-255, December.
    20. Brian T. McCann & Mona Bahl, 2017. "The influence of competition from informal firms on new product development," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(7), pages 1518-1535, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:72-:d:746163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.