IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i3p148-d1727624.html

Islamic vs. Conventional Banking in the Age of FinTech and AI: Evolving Business Models, Efficiency, and Stability (2020–2024)

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelrhman Meero

    (College of Business, Kingdom University, Riffa 40434, Bahrain)

Abstract

This study explores how FinTech and artificial intelligence (AI) adoption shape efficiency and financial stability in dual-banking systems. It focuses on 26 listed Islamic and conventional banks across 11 countries in the MENA and Southeast Asia regions between 2020 and 2024. To measure digital adoption, we create a seven-component FinTech Adoption Index. We use fixed-effects regressions to examine its impact on cost efficiency, profitability, solvency stability, and credit risk. This analysis also controls bank size, capitalization, and macroeconomic conditions. The results show a clear adoption gap. Conventional banks consistently score 0.5–0.8 points higher on the FinTech Index compared to Islamic banks. Each additional FinTech component raised operating costs by about 0.8%, but improved profitability slightly by only 0.03%. This suggests that technological integration creates upfront costs before any real efficiency gains are seen. However, the stability benefits are stronger. FinTech adoption increases the Z-score by 3.6 points and lowers the non-performing loan ratio by 0.1%. Islamic banks gain more stability benefits due to their risk-sharing contracts and asset-backed financing structures. Overall, an efficiency–stability trade-off emerges. Conventional banks focus more on profitability, while Islamic banks gain resilience, but face slower efficiency improvements. By combining the Resource-Based View and Financial Stability Theory, this study provides the first multi-country evidence of how governance structures shape digital transformation in dual-banking markets. The findings offer practical guidance for regulators and bank managers around balancing innovation, efficiency, and stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelrhman Meero, 2025. "Islamic vs. Conventional Banking in the Age of FinTech and AI: Evolving Business Models, Efficiency, and Stability (2020–2024)," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:148-:d:1727624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/148/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/148/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pejman Abedifar & Philip Molyneux & Amine Tarazi, 2013. "Risk in Islamic Banking," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 17(6), pages 2035-2096.
    2. Laeven, Luc & Levine, Ross, 2009. "Bank governance, regulation and risk taking," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 259-275, August.
    3. Andreas Fuster & Matthew Plosser & Philipp Schnabl & James Vickery, 2019. "The Role of Technology in Mortgage Lending," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1854-1899.
    4. Hassan, M. Kabir & Aliyu, Sirajo, 2018. "A contemporary survey of islamic banking literature," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 12-43.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haddou, Samira & Boughrara, Adel, 2025. "How diversification shapes full-fledged Islamic bank Stability? A causal inference approach," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Hafiz Hoque & Heng Liu, 2023. "Impact of bank regulation on risk of Islamic and conventional banks," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 1025-1062, January.
    3. Albaity, Mohamed & Mallek, Ray Saadaoui & Noman, Abu Hanifa Md., 2019. "Competition and bank stability in the MENA region: The moderating effect of Islamic versus conventional banks," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 310-325.
    4. Mollah, Sabur & Skully, Michael & Liljeblom, Eva, 2021. "Strong Boards and Risk-taking in Islamic Banks," Review of Corporate Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(1-2), pages 135-180, April.
    5. Shabir, Mohsin & Jiang, Ping & Shahab, Yasir & Wang, Wenhao & Işık, Özcan & Mehroush, Iqra, 2024. "Diversification and bank stability: Role of political instability and climate risk," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PB), pages 63-92.
    6. Anupam Das Gupta & Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq, 2020. "Do competition and revenue diversification have significant effect on risk-taking? Empirical evidence from BRICS banks," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(01), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Smaoui, Houcem & Mimouni, Karim & Miniaoui, Héla & Temimi, Akram, 2020. "Funding liquidity risk and banks' risk-taking: Evidence from Islamic and conventional banks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Mohamed, Toka S. & Elgammal, Mohammed M., 2023. "Credit risk in Islamic microfinance institutions: The role of women, groups, and rural borrowers," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Azad, A.S.M. Sohel & Azmat, Saad & Hayat, Aziz, 2023. "What determines the profitability of Islamic banks: Lending or fee?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 882-896.
    10. Janbaz, Mehdi & Hassan, M. Kabir & Floreani, Josanco & Dreassi, Alberto & Jiménez, Alfredo, 2022. "Political risk in banks: A review and agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Elekdag, Selim & Emrullahu, Drilona & Ben Naceur, Sami, 2025. "Does FinTech Increase Bank Risk-taking?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Shabir, Mohsin & Jiang, Ping & Wang, Wenhao & Işık, Özcan, 2023. "COVID-19 pandemic impact on banking sector: A cross-country analysis," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Trinh, Vu Quang & Kara, Alper & Elnahass, Marwa, 2022. "Dividend payout strategies and bank survival likelihood: A cross-country analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Zheng, Changjun & Moudud-Ul-Huq, Syed & Rahman, Mohammad Morshedur & Ashraf, Badar Nadeem, 2017. "Does the ownership structure matter for banks’ capital regulation and risk-taking behavior? Empirical evidence from a developing country," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 404-421.
    15. Neifar, Malika, 2020. "Long run comparison analysis and Short run Stability sensitivity: Empirical Evidence from Tunisian Banks," MPRA Paper 101029, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Mohammad Bitar & Sami Ben Naceur & Rym Ayadi & Thomas Walker, 2021. "Basel Compliance and Financial Stability: Evidence from Islamic Banks," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 60(1), pages 81-134, August.
    17. Safiullah, Md, 2023. "Funding liquidity in Islamic banks: Does the Shariah supervisory board's higher educational attainment matter?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    18. Risfandy, Tastaftiyan & Tarazi, Amine & Trinugroho, Irwan, 2022. "Competition in dual markets: Implications for banking system stability," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    19. Albaity, Mohamed & Noman, Abu Hanifa Md. & Saadaoui Mallek, Ray & Al-Shboul, Mohammad, 2022. "Cyclicality of bank credit growth: Conventional vs Islamic banks in the GCC," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(1).
    20. Neifar, Malika, 2020. "Different dimensions Bank performance comparisons IBs vs CBs – Quatar case," MPRA Paper 101375, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:148-:d:1727624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.