IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i3p127-d1694624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Portfolio Analysis Using Power and Natural Logarithm Utility Functions with E-Commerce Data

Author

Listed:
  • Apni Diyanti

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia)

  • Moch. Fandi Ansori

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia)

  • Susilo Hariyanto

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia)

  • Ratna Herdiana

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia)

Abstract

Determining the optimal portfolio is important in the investment process because it includes the selection of appropriate fund allocation to manage financial risk effectively. Although risk cannot be entirely eliminated, it is managed through strategic allocation based on investor preferences. Therefore, this research aimed to use mathematical models, including the power utility function, the natural logarithm utility function, and a combination of both, to capture varying degrees of risk aversion. The optimal allocation was obtained by analytically maximizing the expected end-of-period wealth utility under each specification, where the investor level of risk aversion was derived by determining the constant. The utility function that failed to produce closed-form solutions was solved through the use of a numerical method to approximate the optimal portfolio weight. Furthermore, numerical simulations were performed using data from two stocks in the e-commerce sector to prove the impact of parameter changes on investment decisions. The result showed explicit analytical values for each utility function, providing investors with a structured framework for determining optimal portfolio weights consistent with their risk profile.

Suggested Citation

  • Apni Diyanti & Moch. Fandi Ansori & Susilo Hariyanto & Ratna Herdiana, 2025. "Optimal Portfolio Analysis Using Power and Natural Logarithm Utility Functions with E-Commerce Data," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:127-:d:1694624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/127/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/127/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarantsev, Andrey, 2021. "Optimal portfolio with power utility of absolute and relative wealth," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Hanoch, Giora & Levy, Haim, 1970. "Efficient Portfolio Selection with Quadratic and Cubic Utility," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(2), pages 181-189, April.
    3. Muhammad Niaz Khan & Suzanne G. M. Fifield & David M. Power, 2024. "The impact of the COVID 19 pandemic on stock market volatility: evidence from a selection of developed and emerging stock markets," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(6), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Andrey Sarantsev, 2021. "Optimal Portfolio with Power Utility of Absolute and Relative Wealth," Papers 2105.08139, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    5. Charles E. Phelps, 2024. "A user’s guide to economic utility functions," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 235-280, December.
    6. Taras Bodnar & Yarema Okhrin & Valdemar Vitlinskyy & Taras Zabolotskyy, 2018. "Determination and estimation of risk aversion coefficients," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 297-317, June.
    7. Taras Bodnar & Dmytro Ivasiuk & Nestor Parolya & Wolfgang Schmid, 2023. "Multi-period power utility optimization under stock return predictability," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Fahrenwaldt, Matthias A. & Sun, Chaofan, 2020. "Expected utility approximation and portfolio optimisation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 301-314.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenxian Li & Kefei Han & Zhenyu Lao & Yuyuan Chen, 2024. "The neighborhood effects on the online financial investment of rural households: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Sugu M.M. Zuhair & Daniel B. Taylor & Randall A. Kramer, 1992. "Choice of utility function form: its effect on classification of risk preferences and the prediction of farmer decisions," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(4), pages 333-344, April.
    3. Flores-Ortega, Miguel. & Flores-Castillo, Lilia Alejandra. & Paredes-Gómez, Angelica., 2014. "Selección de portafolios de inversión incluyendo el efecto de asimetría: evidencia con activos de la Bolsa Mexicana de Valores," Panorama Económico, Escuela Superior de Economía, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, vol. 0(19), pages 77-101, segundo s.
    4. Ronald Ravinesh Kumar & Peter Josef Stauvermann, 2022. "Portfolios under Different Methods and Scenarios: A Case of Fiji’s South Pacific Stock Exchange," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, November.
    5. Yan Jin & Dušan Drabik, 2022. "CRISPR Rice vs conventional rice dilemma of a Chinese farmer," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(2), pages 424-446, April.
    6. Gourieroux, C. & Monfort, A., 2005. "The econometrics of efficient portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 1-41, January.
    7. Drynan, Ross G., 1986. "A Note On Optimal Rules For Stochastic Efficiency Analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 30(01), pages 1-10, April.
    8. Hanbali, Hamza, 2025. "Mean-variance longevity risk-sharing for annuity contracts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 207-235.
    9. Wang, Chou-Wen & Liu, Kai & Li, Bin & Tan, Ken Seng, 2022. "Portfolio optimization under multivariate affine generalized hyperbolic distributions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 49-66.
    10. Moshe Leshno & Haim Levy, 2002. "Preferred by "All" and Preferred by "Most" Decision Makers: Almost Stochastic Dominance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1074-1085, August.
    11. Chunhachinda, Pornchai & Dandapani, Krishnan & Hamid, Shahid & Prakash, Arun J., 1997. "Portfolio selection and skewness: Evidence from international stock markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 143-167, February.
    12. Eric Jondeau & Michael Rockinger, 2006. "Optimal Portfolio Allocation under Higher Moments," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 12(1), pages 29-55, January.
    13. Z. Y. Wu & J. Quan & G. Q. Li & J. Tian, 2012. "Necessary Optimality Conditions and New Optimization Methods for Cubic Polynomial Optimization Problems with Mixed Variables," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 408-435, May.
    14. Hollstein, Fabian & Nguyen, Duc Binh Benno & Prokopczuk, Marcel, 2019. "Asset prices and “the devil(s) you know”," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 20-35.
    15. Post, Thierry & van Vliet, Pim, 2006. "Downside risk and asset pricing," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 823-849, March.
    16. Simaan, Yusif, 2014. "The opportunity cost of mean–variance choice under estimation risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 382-391.
    17. Ramaratnam, S. Sri & Rister, M. Edward & Bessler, David A. & Novak, James, 1986. "Risk Attitudes and Farm/Producer Attributes: A Case Study of Texas Coastal Bend Grain Sorghum Producers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 85-96, December.
    18. Benjamin Avanzi & Hayden Lau & Mogens Steffensen, 2022. "Optimal reinsurance design under solvency constraints," Papers 2203.16108, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    19. George Samartzis & Nikitas Pittis, 2022. "On The Equivalence Of The Mean Variance Criterion And Stochastic Dominance Criteria," Papers 2211.01240, arXiv.org.
    20. Hardaker, J. Brian & Tanago, A.G., 1973. "Assessment Of The Output Of A Stochastic Decision Model," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 17(3), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:127-:d:1694624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.