IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i6p885-d1669673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of Low Back Pain Risk Among Farmers in Rural Communities of Loja, Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel Masson Palacios

    (Escuela de Fisioterapia, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, de la Salud y la Vida, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito 170150, Ecuador)

  • Israel Vinueza-Fernandez

    (Facultad de Enfermería, Centro de Investigación para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Pontifica Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito 170150, Ecuador)

  • Samuel-Olegario Iñiguez-Jiminez

    (Faculty of Healthy and Well-Being, School of Physical Therapy, Centro de Investigación para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Pontifica Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito 170150, Ecuador)

  • Mario J. Grijalva

    (Infectious and Tropical Disease Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA)

  • Benjamin R. Bates

    (School of Communication Studies, Scripps College of Communication, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA
    Centro de Investigación para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Pontifica Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito 170150, Ecuador)

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) and musculoskeletal disorders are highly prevalent among agricultural workers. However, there is limited epidemiological evidence from rural regions of Ecuador, where working and living conditions may differ substantially from those in other settings. This study aimed to identify predictors of LBP among farmers in rural Ecuador to inform locally relevant prevention strategies. Methods: Participants aged 30 to 60 years ( n = 103) were recruited through a traveling health clinic. Participants were assessed with behavioral and sociodemographic self-report questionnaires and anthropometric measurements. Low back pain (LBP) was assessed using the Standardized Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, which asked about symptoms experienced in the past 12 months. Bivariate (Chi-square and Fisher exact tests) and multivariate (binary logistic regression) analyses were conducted to explore associations between risk factors and LBP in individuals aged 30 to 60 years. Results: LBP was highly prevalent, affecting 78.6% of participants. Behavioral patterns were mixed, with low rates of smoking and moderate alcohol and coffee consumption associated with LBP. A normal body mass index (BMI) was observed in 66% of the sample, and over half reported stable mood and good self-perceived health. In the binary logistic regression analysis, only education level significantly predicted LBP, with secondary education acting as a protective factor. Conclusions: While lower back pain was widespread in the population studied, most risk factors that were analyzed were not significantly associated with its presence.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel Masson Palacios & Israel Vinueza-Fernandez & Samuel-Olegario Iñiguez-Jiminez & Mario J. Grijalva & Benjamin R. Bates, 2025. "Predictors of Low Back Pain Risk Among Farmers in Rural Communities of Loja, Ecuador," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(6), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:885-:d:1669673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amarin Kongtawelert & Bryan Buchholz & Dusit Sujitrarath & Wisanti Laohaudomchok & Pornpimol Kongtip & Susan Woskie, 2022. "Prevalence and Factors Associated with Musculoskeletal Disorders among Thai Burley Tobacco Farmers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Parnchon Chokprasit & Supabhorn Yimthiang & Siriluk Veerasakul, 2022. "Predictors of Low Back Pain Risk among Rubber Harvesters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Samuels, David & Thomson, Henry, 2025. "The Green Revolution is not always bloodless: Agricultural modernization and rural conflict in Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Stabile, Marcelo C.C. & Guimarães, André L. & Silva, Daniel S. & Ribeiro, Vivian & Macedo, Marcia N. & Coe, Michael T. & Pinto, Erika & Moutinho, Paulo & Alencar, Ane, 2020. "Solving Brazil's land use puzzle: Increasing production and slowing Amazon deforestation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Mr. Holger Floerkemeier & Mr. Nikola Spatafora, 2021. "Regional Disparities, Growth, and Inclusiveness," IMF Working Papers 2021/038, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muradian, Roldan & Cahyafitri, Raras & Ferrando, Tomaso & Grottera, Carolina & Jardim-Wanderley, Luiz & Krause, Torsten & Kurniawan, Nanang I. & Loft, Lasse & Nurshafira, Tadzkia & Prabawati-Suwito, D, 2025. "Will the EU deforestation-free products regulation (EUDR) reduce tropical forest loss? Insights from three producer countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Liam O'Farrell & Roman Zwicky, 2022. "“The System Is the System, Isn’t It?”: The Case for a Just Devolution," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 75-85.
    3. Miranda, Bruno Varella & de Oliveira, Gustavo Magalhães, 2023. "Assessing the performance of voluntary environmental agreements under high monitoring costs: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    4. Gabriel da Silva Medina & Claudio Wilson Soares Barbosa, 2023. "The Neglected Solutions: Local Farming Systems for Sustainable Development in the Amazon," World, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Conceição, Katyanne V. & Chaves, Michel E.D. & Picoli, Michelle C.A. & Sánchez, Alber H. & Soares, Anderson R. & Mataveli, Guilherme A.V. & Silva, Daniel E. & Costa, Joelma S. & Camara, Gilberto, 2021. "Government policies endanger the indigenous peoples of the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Carauta, Marcelo & Troost, Christian & Guzman-Bustamante, Ivan & Hampf, Anna & Libera, Affonso & Meurer, Katharina & Bönecke, Eric & Franko, Uwe & Ribeiro Rodrigues, Renato de Aragão & Berger, Thomas, 2021. "Climate-related land use policies in Brazil: How much has been achieved with economic incentives in agriculture?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Bart van Ark, 2021. "Putting Together the Pieces of the Productivity Puzzle: Review Article of Productivity Perspectives and Productivity and the Pandemic," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 40, pages 118-133, Spring.
    8. Eric de Souza Nascimento & Sonaira Souza da Silva & Leandra Bordignon & Antonio Willian Flores de Melo & Amintas Brandão & Carlos M. Souza & Celso H. L. Silva Junior, 2021. "Roads in the Southwestern Amazon, State of Acre, between 2007 and 2019," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Mueller, Bernardo, 2022. "Property rights and violence in indigenous land in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    10. Dumortier, Jerome & Elobeid, Amani, 2021. "Effects of a carbon tax in the United States on agricultural markets and carbon emissions from land-use change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Berbée, Paul & Braun, Sebastian & Franke, Richard, 2022. "Reversing fortunes of German regions, 1926-2019: Boon and bane of early industrialization?," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-025, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Parnchon Chokprasit & Supabhorn Yimthiang & Siriluk Veerasakul, 2022. "Predictors of Low Back Pain Risk among Rubber Harvesters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Silva-Muller, Livio, 2022. "Payment for ecosystem services and the practices of environmental fieldworkers in policy implementation: The case of Bolsa Floresta in the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Porro, Roberto & Porro, Noemi Sakiara Miyasaka, 2022. "State-led social and environmental policy failure in a Brazilian forest frontier: Sustainable Development Project in Anapu, Pará," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    15. Alexandre Anders Brasil & Humberto Angelo & Alexandre Nascimento de Almeida & Eraldo Aparecido Trondoli Matricardi & Henrique Marinho Leite Chaves & Maristela Franchetti de Paula, 2023. "Modeling the Impacts of Soil Management on Avoided Deforestation and REDD+ Payments in the Brazilian Amazon: A Systems Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, August.
    16. Daniella Tiemi Sasaki Okida & Osmar Abílio de Carvalho Júnior & Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho & Roberto Arnaldo Trancoso Gomes & Renato Fontes Guimarães, 2021. "Relationship between Land Property Security and Brazilian Amazon Deforestation in the Mato Grosso State during the Period 2013–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Maruseva, Valeria & Kroll, Henning, 2024. "Potential and resilience: Evidence from peripheral regions of Germany," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 82, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    18. Nils Grashof & Stefano Basilico, 2023. "The dark side of green innovation? Green transition and regional inequality in Europe," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2314, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2023.
    19. Albanese, Giuseppe & Carrieri, Vincenzo & Speziali, Maria Maddalena, 2021. "Looking for a Star: Evaluating the Effect of the Cohesion Policy on Regional Well-Being," IZA Discussion Papers 14521, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Ashton de Silva & Maria Yanotti & Sarah Sinclair & Sveta Angelopoulos, 2023. "Place‐Based Policies and Nowcasting," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 56(3), pages 363-370, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:885-:d:1669673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.