IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2320-d1049234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusion of Cultural and Linguistic Diversity in COVID-19 Public Health Research: Research Design Adaptations to Seek Different Perspectives in Victoria, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Gibbs

    (Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
    Joint first author.)

  • Alexander J. Thomas

    (The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    Joint first author.)

  • Alison Coelho

    (Coelho Networks, Melbourne, VIC 3058, Australia)

  • Adil Al-Qassas

    (The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • Karen Block

    (Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia)

  • Niamh Meagher

    (Peter Doherty Institute for Infection & Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia)

  • Limya Eisa

    (The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Stephanie Fletcher-Lartey

    (The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Tianhui Ke

    (The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Phoebe Kerr

    (The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Edwin Jit Leung Kwong

    (Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Colin MacDougall

    (Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Deng Malith

    (The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Katitza Marinkovic Chavez

    (Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Deborah Osborne

    (The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • David J. Price

    (Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
    Peter Doherty Institute for Infection & Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Freya Shearer

    (Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mark Stoove

    (The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kathryn Young

    (The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yanqin Zhang

    (The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Katherine B. Gibney

    (Peter Doherty Institute for Infection & Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
    Shared senior oversight.)

  • Margaret Hellard

    (The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    Shared senior oversight.)

Abstract

Participation of people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities in public health research is often limited by challenges with recruitment, retention and second-language data collection. Consequently, people from CALD communities are at risk of their needs being marginalised in public health interventions. This paper presents intrinsic case analyses of two studies which were adapted to increase the cultural competence of research processes. Both cases were part of the Optimise study, a major mixed methods research study in Australia which provided evidence to inform the Victorian state government’s decision-making about COVID-19 public health measures. Case study 1 involved the core Optimise longitudinal cohort study and Case study 2 was the CARE Victorian representative survey, an Optimise sub-study. Both case studies engaged cultural advisors and bilingual staff to adjust the survey measures and research processes to suit target CALD communities. Reflexive processes provided insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the inclusive strategies. Selected survey results are provided, demonstrating variation across CALD communities and in comparison to participants who reported speaking English at home. While in most cases a gradient of disadvantage was evident for CALD communities, some patterns were unexpected. The case studies demonstrate the challenge and value of investing in culturally competent research processes to ensure research guiding policy captures a spectrum of experiences and perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Gibbs & Alexander J. Thomas & Alison Coelho & Adil Al-Qassas & Karen Block & Niamh Meagher & Limya Eisa & Stephanie Fletcher-Lartey & Tianhui Ke & Phoebe Kerr & Edwin Jit Leung Kwong & Colin MacD, 2023. "Inclusion of Cultural and Linguistic Diversity in COVID-19 Public Health Research: Research Design Adaptations to Seek Different Perspectives in Victoria, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2320-:d:1049234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2320/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2320/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Todd C. Knepper & Howard L. McLeod, 2018. "When will clinical trials finally reflect diversity?," Nature, Nature, vol. 557(7704), pages 157-159, May.
    2. Joseph Henrich & Steve J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan, 2010. "The Weirdest People in the World?," RatSWD Working Papers 139, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    3. Kathleen Manipis & Deborah Street & Paula Cronin & Rosalie Viney & Stephen Goodall, 2021. "Exploring the Trade-Off Between Economic and Health Outcomes During a Pandemic: A Discrete Choice Experiment of Lockdown Policies in Australia," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(3), pages 359-371, May.
    4. Saima May Sidik, 2022. "How COVID has deepened inequality — in six stark graphics," Nature, Nature, vol. 606(7915), pages 638-639, June.
    5. George, S. & Duran, N. & Norris, K., 2014. "A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(2), pages 16-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brandy M Mapes & Christopher S Foster & Sheila V Kusnoor & Marcia I Epelbaum & Mona AuYoung & Gwynne Jenkins & Maria Lopez-Class & Dara Richardson-Heron & Ahmed Elmi & Karl Surkan & Robert M Cronin & , 2020. "Diversity and inclusion for the All of Us research program: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, July.
    2. repec:osf:osfxxx:fqmdu_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Sibilla Di Guida & Ido Erev & Davide Marchiori, 2014. "Cross Cultural Differences in Decisions from Experience: Evidence from Denmark, Israel and Taiwain," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2014-16, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Hind Dib‐slamani & Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2021. "Is theft considered less severe when the victim is a foreign company?," Post-Print hal-03340844, HAL.
    5. Nina Margrethe Kynoe & Drude Fugelseth & Ingrid Hanssen, 2020. "When a common language is missing: Nurse–mother communication in the NICU. A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2221-2230, July.
    6. Shi, Yun & Cui, Xiangyu & Zhou, Xunyu, 2020. "Beta and Coskewness Pricing: Perspective from Probability Weighting," SocArXiv 5rqhv, Center for Open Science.
    7. Marina Elefante & Tazeen Hasan & Marie Hyland & Natalia Mazoni Silva Martins & Tea Trumbic, 2023. "Accelerating Gender Equality Through Reforming Legal Frameworks," World Bank Publications - Reports 39875, The World Bank Group.
    8. Kyriaki Remoundou & Drichoutis Andreas & Phoebe Koundouri, 2010. "Warm glow in charitable auctions: Are the WEIRDos driving the results?," DEOS Working Papers 1028, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    9. Stephen L. Cheung & Agnieszka Tymula & Xueting Wang, 2022. "Present bias for monetary and dietary rewards," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1202-1233, September.
    10. Plante, Charles & Lassoued, Rim & Phillips, Peter W.B., 2017. "The Social Determinants of Cognitive Bias: The Effects of Low Capability on Decision Making in a Framing Experiment," SocArXiv u62cx, Center for Open Science.
    11. John A. List, 2024. "Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 491-499, February.
    12. Nicolas Jacquemet & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2014. "What drives failure to maximize payoffs in the lab? A test of the inequality aversion hypothesis," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 18(4), pages 243-264, December.
    13. repec:osf:socarx:n49hv_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Dai, Zhixin & Zheng, Jiwei & Zizzo, Daniel John, 2024. "Theories of reasoning and focal point play with a matched non-student sample," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    15. Jenny C Su & Chi-Yue Chiu & Wei-Fang Lin & Shigehiro Oishi, 2016. "Social Monitoring Matters for Deterring Social Deviance in Stable but Not Mobile Socio-Ecological Contexts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, November.
    16. repec:osf:osfxxx:nb7tg_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Goran Calic & Moren Lévesque & Anton Shevchenko, 2024. "On why women-owned businesses take more time to secure microloans," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 917-938, October.
    18. Crooks, Natasha & Yates, Latrice & Sosina, Wuraola & Johnson, Juquita & Strong, Alexis & Griggs, Brianna & Shipp, Kentrele & Green, Betty & Matthews, Alicia & Johnson, Waldo, 2024. "Strategies for engaging Black male caregivers in family-based research," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Sirola, Nina, 2023. "Going beyond the call of duty under conditions of economic threat: Integrating life history and temporal dilemma perspectives," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    20. Joshua Conrad Jackson & Marieke van Egmond & Virginia K Choi & Carol R Ember & Jamin Halberstadt & Jovana Balanovic & Inger N Basker & Klaus Boehnke & Noemi Buki & Ronald Fischer & Marta Fulop & Ashle, 2019. "Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, September.
    21. Cameron Harwick, 2023. "Money’s mutation of the modern moral mind: The Simmel hypothesis and the cultural evolution of WEIRDness," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1571-1592, November.
    22. Holli-Anne Passmore & Ying Yang & Sarena Sabine, 2022. "An Extended Replication Study of the Well-Being Intervention, the Noticing Nature Intervention (NNI)," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 2663-2683, August.
    23. Chen, Daniel L. & Schonger, Martin & Wickens, Chris, 2016. "oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 88-97.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2320-:d:1049234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.