IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i13-14p2221-2230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When a common language is missing: Nurse–mother communication in the NICU. A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Margrethe Kynoe
  • Drude Fugelseth
  • Ingrid Hanssen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how communication in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) between immigrant mothers and nurses take place without having a common language, and how these mothers experience their NICU stay. Background Admission of infants to NICU affects both parents and infants. Immigrant mothers constitute a vulnerable hospital population in need of culturally, linguistically and individually tailored information. Design and methods The study had a qualitative design reported according to the COREQ criteria. Eight mothers who spoke neither Scandinavian nor English went through individual semi‐structured interviews. Six mother–nurse interactions were observed, and eight nurses' experiences were explored through focus‐group interviews. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. The analysis was thematic and hermeneutic in character. Results Interpreters were present during the consultations with the physicians, but rarely during the daily nurse‐mother interactions. Nurses focused on daily routines, infant care guidance and mother–infant attachment. The mothers learned through demonstrations and hands‐on guidance. Language barriers made it difficult to assess the mothers' understanding, but the mothers expressed that they felt adequately included in the care of their infant and well informed and guided. Even so, both mothers and nurses expressed desire to use interpreters more regularly. The pictorial communication boards available lacked important vocabulary needed in neonatal nursing contexts and their use furthermore interrupted the mother–nurse conversation. Conclusion Body language, simple words, guesswork, trial and error characterised the nurse–mother interaction. The nurses adopted various communication strategies to help the mothers understand and give them a voice. Competent interpreters were used during meetings with physicians, but not during daily bedside guidance and information giving by nurses. Relevance to clinical practice Knowledge of immigrant mothers' and nurses' communication strategies and how both parties think, feel and act to overcome communication problem is necessary to improve clinical practice and reduce communication barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Margrethe Kynoe & Drude Fugelseth & Ingrid Hanssen, 2020. "When a common language is missing: Nurse–mother communication in the NICU. A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2221-2230, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:13-14:p:2221-2230
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15212
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melanie Turner & Anna Chur‐Hansen & Helen Winefield, 2014. "The neonatal nurses' view of their role in emotional support of parents and its complexities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3156-3165, November.
    2. George, S. & Duran, N. & Norris, K., 2014. "A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(2), pages 16-31.
    3. Dua'a Fayiz Al Maghaireh & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Chong Mei Chan & Chua Yan Piaw & Mariam Mofleh Al Kawafha, 2016. "Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental experiences in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2745-2756, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Petty & Joy Jarvis & Rebecca Thomas, 2019. "Understanding parents’ emotional experiences for neonatal education: A narrative, interpretive approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1911-1924, May.
    2. Amelia S Knopf & Peter Krombach & Amy J Katz & Rebecca Baker & Gregory Zimet, 2021. "Measuring research mistrust in adolescents and adults: Validity and reliability of an adapted version of the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, January.
    3. Rohini Chakravarthy & Sarah C Stallings & Michael Williams & Megan Hollister & Mario Davidson & Juan Canedo & Consuelo H Wilkins, 2020. "Factors influencing precision medicine knowledge and attitudes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Anne Brødsgaard & Jette Thise Pedersen & Palle Larsen & Janne Weis, 2019. "Parents' and nurses' experiences of partnership in neonatal intensive care units: A qualitative review and meta‐synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3117-3139, September.
    5. Peter Henley & Tanimola Martins & Reza Zamani, 2023. "Assessing Ethnic Minority Representation in Fibromyalgia Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Recruitment Demographics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(24), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Bruce, Marta M. & Ulrich, Connie M. & Webster, Jessica & Richmond, Therese S., 2022. "Injured black men's perceptions of the recovery environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Charlene S. Aaron, 2016. "Recruitment of African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes Who Care For Persons With Dementia," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 25(1), pages 3-8, February.
    8. William T. Hu & Stephanie M. Bergren & Dana K. Dychtwald & Yiming Ma & XinQi Dong, 2023. "Variations in racial and ethnic groups’ trust in researchers associated with willingness to participate in research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Stephen Amoah & Ruth Ennin & Karen Sagoe & Astrid Steinbrecher & Tobias Pischon & Frank P. Mockenhaupt & Ina Danquah, 2021. "Feasibility of a Culturally Adapted Dietary Weight-Loss Intervention among Ghanaian Migrants in Berlin, Germany: The ADAPT Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Margarita Echeverri & David Anderson & Anna María Nápoles & Jacqueline M. Haas & Marc E. Johnson & Friar Sergio A. Serrano, 2018. "Cancer Health Literacy and Willingness to Participate in Cancer Research and Donate Bio-Specimens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Pia Lundqvist & Janne Weis & Bengt Sivberg, 2019. "Parents’ journey caring for a preterm infant until discharge from hospital‐based neonatal home care—A challenging process to cope with," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2966-2978, August.
    12. Hannah Skelton & Hannah G. Dahlen & Kim Psaila & Virginia Schmied, 2019. "Facilitating closeness between babies with congenital abnormalities and their parents in the NICU: A qualitative study of neonatal nurses' experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2979-2989, August.
    13. Wei Fu & Shin-Yi Chou & Li-San Wang, 2022. "NIH Grant Expansion, Ancestral Diversity and Scientific Discovery in Genomics Research," NBER Working Papers 30155, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Florence Samkange-Zeeb & Ronja Foraita & Stefan Rach & Tilman Brand, 2019. "Feasibility of using respondent-driven sampling to recruit participants in superdiverse neighbourhoods for a general health survey," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(3), pages 451-459, April.
    15. Kristina W. Whitworth & Inkyu Han & Masoud Afshar & Yuan Mei & Pamela D. Berens & Shreela V. Sharma & Elaine Symanski, 2017. "Accessing Disadvantaged Pregnant Women in Houston, Texas, and Characterizing Biomarkers of Metal Exposure: A Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-9, April.
    16. Tal Yatziv & Yoav Kessler & Naama Atzaba-Poria, 2018. "What’s going on in my baby’s mind? Mothers’ executive functions contribute to individual differences in maternal mentalization during mother-infant interactions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-30, November.
    17. Dalnim Cho & Beverly Gor & Hyunsoo Hwang & Xuemei Wang & Mike Hernandez & Lovell A. Jones & Jacqueline Frost & Pamela Roberson & Curtis A. Pettaway, 2024. "A Community-Based Prostate Cancer Screening and Education Program for Asian American Men in Medically Underserved Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-11, March.
    18. K. Viswanath & Rachel Faulkenberry McCloud & Edmund W. J. Lee & Mesfin A. Bekalu, 2022. "Measuring What Matters: Data Absenteeism, Science Communication, and the Perpetuation of Inequities," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 700(1), pages 208-219, March.
    19. Rachel E. Davis & Frederick G. Conrad & Shaohua Dong & Anna Mesa & Sunghee Lee & Timothy P. Johnson, 2024. "An ounce of prevention: using conversational interviewing and avoiding agreement response scales to prevent acquiescence," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 471-495, February.
    20. Zamil Khadija & Alsharqi Omar, 2019. "The Effect of Information Technology on the Recruitment Process in Healthcare Organization in Makkah City," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 123-123, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:13-14:p:2221-2230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.