IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i10p5837-d1148310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Prevalence of Bereavement, Its Contribution to Risk for Binge Drinking, and Other High-Risk Health States in a State Population Survey, 2019 Georgia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Toni P. Miles

    (Rosalynn Carter Institute for Caregivers, Atlanta, GA 31709, USA
    Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

  • Changle Li

    (Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
    School of Health Management, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350122, China)

  • M. Mahmud Khan

    (Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

  • Rana Bayakly

    (Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Deborah Carr

    (Center of Innovation in Social Science, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA)

Abstract

Background: Binge drinking is a pattern of alcohol abuse. Its prevalence and associated risk factors are not well documented. Heavy drinking, on the other hand, has a well-documented association with bereavement. This report uses a cross-sectional, population-based survey to estimate prevalence of bingeing and its association with new bereavement. Bingeing is defined as 4 or more drinks (women) or 5 or more drinks (men) in a 2–4-h setting. For the first time in 2019, the Georgia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS) included a bereavement item: ‘Have you experienced the death of a family member or close friend in the years 2018 or 2019?’ Methods: Georgia BRFSS is a complex sampling survey administered annually. It is designed to represent the 8.1 million people aged 18 years and older in the U.S. state of Georgia. Alcohol consumption patterns are routinely measured in the common core. In 2019, the state added a new item probing for bereavement in the prior 24 months predating the COVID-19 pandemic. Imputation and weighting techniques were applied to yield the population prevalence rates of new bereavement, bingeing, and their co-occurrence with other high-risk health behaviors and outcomes. Multivariate models, adjusted for age, gender, and race, were used to estimate the risk for other unhealthy behaviors posed by the co-occurrence of bereavement and bingeing. Results: In Georgia, bereavement (45.8%), and alcohol consumption (48.8%) are common. Bereavement and alcohol use co-occurred among 1,796,817 people (45% of all drinkers) with a subset of 608,282 persons reporting bereavement combined with bingeing. The most common types of bereavement were death of a friend/neighbor (30.7%) or three plus deaths (31.8%). Conclusions: While bingeing is a known risk to public health, its co-occurrence with recent bereavement is a new observation. Public health surveillance systems need to monitor this co-occurrence to protect both individual and societal health. In a time of global bereavement, documenting its influence on binge drinking can support the work towards Sustainable Development Goal #3—Good health and Well-Being.

Suggested Citation

  • Toni P. Miles & Changle Li & M. Mahmud Khan & Rana Bayakly & Deborah Carr, 2023. "Estimating Prevalence of Bereavement, Its Contribution to Risk for Binge Drinking, and Other High-Risk Health States in a State Population Survey, 2019 Georgia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Surv," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5837-:d:1148310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5837/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5837/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Itzik Fadlon & Torben Heien Nielsen, 2019. "Family Health Behaviors," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(9), pages 3162-3191, September.
    2. Geert Dom & Jerzy Samochowiec & Sara Evans-Lacko & Kristian Wahlbeck & Guido Van Hal & David McDaid, 2016. "The Impact of the 2008 Economic Crisis on Substance Use Patterns in the Countries of the European Union," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Dom, Geert & Samochowiec, Jerzy & Evans-Lacko, Sara & Wahlbeck, Kristian & Van Hal, Guido & McDaid, David, 2016. "The impact of the 2008 economic crisis on substance use patterns in the countries of the European Union," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65068, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Jae Kwang Kim & J. Michael Brick & Wayne A. Fuller & Graham Kalton, 2006. "On the bias of the multiple‐imputation variance estimator in survey sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(3), pages 509-521, June.
    5. Ashton M. Verdery & Emily Smith-Greenaway & Rachel Margolis & Jonathan Daw, 2020. "Tracking the reach of COVID-19 kin loss with a bereavement multiplier applied to the United States," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(30), pages 17695-17701, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Sophia Ioannides & Marios Georgiou & Irene Voukkali & Luca Salvati & Yannis E. Doukas, 2023. "Shaping Sustainable Cities: A Long-Term GIS-Emanated Spatial Analysis of Settlement Growth and Planning in a Coastal Mediterranean European City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Drydakis, Nick, 2023. "Health Inequalities Among People Experiencing Food Insecurity. An Intersectional Approach," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1362, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    3. Carme Borrell & Laia Palència & Lucia Bosakova & Mercè Gotsens & Joana Morrison & Claudia Costa & Dagmar Dzurova & Patrick Deboosere & Michala Lustigova & Marc Marí-Dell’Olmo & Sophia Rodopoulou & Pau, 2021. "Socioeconomic Inequalities in Chronic Liver Diseases and Cirrhosis Mortality in European Urban Areas before and after the Onset of the 2008 Economic Recession," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Xiao Hu & Yang Wang & Jidong Huang & Rong Zheng, 2019. "Cigarette Affordability and Cigarette Consumption among Adult and Elderly Chinese Smokers: Evidence from A Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Heide Busse & Christoph Buck & Christiane Stock & Hajo Zeeb & Claudia R. Pischke & Paula Mayara Matos Fialho & Claus Wendt & Stefanie Maria Helmer, 2021. "Engagement in Health Risk Behaviours before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in German University Students: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Riekhoff, Aart-Jan & Vaalavuo, Maria, 2021. "Health shocks and couples’ labor market participation: A turning point or stuck in the trajectory?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    7. Simonsen, Marianne & Skipper, Lars & Skipper, Niels & Thingholm, Peter Rønø, 2021. "Discontinuity in care: Practice closures among primary care providers and patient health care utilization," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Aouad, Marion, 2021. "An Examination of the Intracorrelation of Family Health Insurance," IZA Discussion Papers 14541, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Sha Jiang & Wenyun Zuo & Zhen Guo & Hal Caswell & Shripad Tuljapurkar, 2023. "How does the demographic transition affect kinship networks?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(32), pages 899-930.
    10. Mariacristina De Nardi & Eric French & John Bailey Jones & Rory McGee, 2021. "Why Do Couples and Singles Save During Retirement?," Richmond Fed Economic Brief, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 21(09), pages 1-65, May.
    11. De Gruyter, Elaine & Petrie, Dennis & Black, Nicole, 2023. "Household donations of time and money in response to a health shock," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    12. Rellstab, Sara & Bakx, Pieter & García-Gómez, Pilar & van Doorslaer, Eddy, 2020. "The kids are alright - labour market effects of unexpected parental hospitalisations in the Netherlands," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Lynn, Peter & Fumagalli, Laura & Muñoz-Bugarin, Jair, 2021. "The effect of formal debt advice on financial management and knowledge: insights from a new longitudinal study in Britain," ISER Working Paper Series 2021-09, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    14. Klauber, Hannah & Holub, Felix & Koch, Nicolas & Pestel, Nico & Ritter, Nolan & Rohlf, Alexander, 2021. "Killing Prescriptions Softly: Low Emission Zones and Child Health from Birth to School," IZA Discussion Papers 14376, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Gathmann, Christina & Huttunen, Kristiina & Jernström, Laura & Sääksvuori, Lauri & Stitzing, Robin, 2020. "In Sickness and in Health: Job Displacement and Health. Spillovers in Couples," Working Papers 133, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    16. Henri Salokangas, 2021. "Exploring the labor market consequences of psychiatric disorders: An event study approach," Discussion Papers 148, Aboa Centre for Economics.
    17. Crudu, Federico & Neri, Laura & Tiezzi, Silvia, 2021. "Family ties and child obesity in Italy," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    18. Diego Alburez-Gutierrez, 2021. "The demographic drivers of grief and memory after genocide in Guatemala," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2021-003, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    19. Ko, Hansoo, 2021. "Behavioral responses to the 2015 MERS epidemic in Korea," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    20. Młodak Andrzej, 2021. "An application of a complex measure to model–based imputation in business statistics," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5837-:d:1148310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.