IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4610-d791664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Satisfaction with Solid Waste Management Services: A Central–Local Comparison in China

Author

Listed:
  • Aiqin Wang

    (School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Xuyang Chen

    (School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Xu Wang

    (School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Jia Wei

    (School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Liying Song

    (School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

Abstract

The Chinese central government proclaimed a mandatory or demonstration waste separation policy in some cities or counties to manage the increasing amounts of generated waste since 2017. Many cities and regions have also begun to build waste separation management systems and institutions, and community managers have created waste management rules and provided separation management services under the guidance of local government. However, little is known about how these policies or services have performed and the degree of residents’ satisfaction, especially regarding the central government. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze the consequence of these policies using residents’ community and national satisfaction levels with solid waste management services (SWMS) and their determinants. An online survey in 2021 showed that the overall satisfaction levels of communities and national SWMS are similar, but the differences between rural and urban regions are significant. Residents’ satisfaction with community SWMS in urban regions was higher than national satisfaction, and the results in rural regions was contrary. The determinants of community and national satisfaction were also different and varied by region. To improve satisfaction, the government need to standardize basic management systems in different types of regions, gradually improve management services and institutions in rural areas and non-pilot cities and provide special services or facilities for less healthy residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Aiqin Wang & Xuyang Chen & Xu Wang & Jia Wei & Liying Song, 2022. "Determinants of Satisfaction with Solid Waste Management Services: A Central–Local Comparison in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4610-:d:791664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4610/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4610/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yohannis Fetene, 2018. "Client Satisfaction Towards Municipal Solid Waste Management Service in Jimma City, South West Ethiopia," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 13(3), pages 81-86, July.
    2. Johnson, Michael D. & Herrmann, Andreas & Gustafsson, Anders, 2002. "Comparing customer satisfaction across industries and countries," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 749-769, December.
    3. Rhys Andrews & Steven Van de Walle, 2013. "New Public Management and Citizens' Perceptions of Local Service Efficiency, Responsiveness, Equity and Effectiveness," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 762-783, June.
    4. World Bank Group, 2018. "Municipal Solid Waste Management," World Bank Publications - Reports 30434, The World Bank Group.
    5. Shiwang Yu & Jianxia Bao & Wen Ding & Xue Chen & Xiaonan Tang & Jianli Hao & Wei Zhang & Prateek Singh, 2021. "Investigating the Relationship between Public Satisfaction and Public Environmental Participation during Government Treatment of Urban Malodorous Black River in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Ying Ma & Mansoor Ahmed Koondhar & Shengke Liu & Huiling Wang & Rong Kong, 2020. "Perceived Value Influencing the Household Waste Sorting Behaviors in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Tianyang Lou & Deyong Wang & Huili Chen & Dongjie Niu, 2020. "Different Perceptions of Belief: Predicting Household Solid Waste Separation Behavior of Urban and Rural Residents in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Jing Hou & Yujing Jin & Feiyu Chen, 2020. "Should Waste Separation Be Mandatory? A Study on Public’s Response to the Policies in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bo Zhou & Fang Qi & Muhammad Faraz Riaz & Tariq Ali, 2022. "An Analysis of the Factors behind Rural Residents’ Satisfaction with Residential Waste Management in Jiangxi, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Janina Kotlinska & Helena Zukowska & Marian Zukowski, 2023. "Management of Municipal Solid Waste in Poland:Issues of Balancing Financial Flows," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 657-679.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yeung, Matthew C.H. & Ramasamy, Bala & Chen, Junsong & Paliwoda, Stan, 2013. "Customer satisfaction and consumer expenditure in selected European countries," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 406-416.
    2. Carolyn‐Dung Thi Thanh Tran & Brian Dollery, 2021. "All in the Mind: Citizen Satisfaction and Financial Performance in the Victorian Local Government System," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(1), pages 51-64, March.
    3. Alessandro, Martin & Cardinale Lagomarsino, Bruno & Scartascini, Carlos & Streb, Jorge & Torrealday, Jerónimo, 2021. "Transparency and Trust in Government. Evidence from a Survey Experiment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Marius Constantin PROFIROIU & Septimiu Rares SZABO, 2016. "Outsourcing vs decentralisation: A comparative analysis in Central and Eastern Europe," Eco-Economics Review, Ecological University of Bucharest, Economics Faculty and Ecology and Environmental Protection Faculty, vol. 2(2), pages 3-26, December.
    5. Cameron Roles & Sukanya Ananth & Michael O’Donnell, 2022. "Reinforcing managerial prerogative in the Australian Public Service during the COVID-19 pandemic," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(1), pages 18-36, March.
    6. Isabel Narbón-Perpiñá & Maria Teresa Balaguer-Coll & Diego Prior & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2021. "Searching for the optimal territorial structure: the case of Spanish provincial councils," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 645-664, April.
    7. He, Yan-Qun & Chan, Lai-Kow & Wu, Ming-Lu, 2007. "Balancing productivity and consumer satisfaction for profitability: Statistical and fuzzy regression analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 252-263, January.
    8. Peng, Yuan & Bai, Xuemei, 2023. "What EV users say about policy efficacy: Evidence from Shanghai," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 16-26.
    9. Day‐Yang Liu & Hsin‐Hsin Yao & Wen‐Min Lu & Cheng‐Hsien Lin, 2020. "Impulse response function analysis of the impacts of land value‐added tax policy on government performance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 1020-1032, September.
    10. Agyeiwaah, Elizabeth & Adongo, Raymond & Dimache, Alexandru & Wondirad, Amare, 2016. "Make a customer, not a sale: Tourist satisfaction in Hong Kong," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 68-79.
    11. Lerbin R. Aritonang R., 2014. "Student Loyalty Modeling," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 26(1), pages 77-91.
    12. Xuemeng Zhang & Chao Liu & Yuexi Chen & Guanghong Zheng & Yinguang Chen, 2022. "Source separation, transportation, pretreatment, and valorization of municipal solid waste: a critical review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11471-11513, October.
    13. Yue Wang & Honggen Zhu & Noshaba Aziz & Yu Liu, 2023. "Does Social Capital Improve the Effectiveness of Public Service? An Insight from Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 431-452, January.
    14. Kuntal Goswami & Rolf Gerritsen, 2021. "Policy Life Cycle Analysis of Three Australian State-level Public Policies: Exploring the Political Dimension of Sustainable Development," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 6(1), pages 9-35, January.
    15. Lih-Ren Liu & Yuh-Ming Lee, 2016. "Remedial Measures for Erroneous Environmental Policies: Assessing Infrastructure Projects of Waste-to-Energy Incineration in Taiwan with a Case Study of the Taitung Incinerator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Cooper, Christine & Lapsley, Irvine, 2021. "Hillsborough: The fight for accountability," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Frank, Björn & Abulaiti, Gulimire & Herbas Torrico, Boris & Enkawa, Takao, 2013. "How do Asia's two most important consumer markets differ? Japanese–Chinese differences in customer satisfaction and its formation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2397-2405.
    18. Veronika Vaseková, 2022. "How do people in China perceive water? From health threat perception to environmental policy change," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 627-645, September.
    19. Víctor Giménez & Jorge R. Keith & Diego Prior, 2019. "Do healthcare financing systems influence hospital efficiency? A metafrontier approach for the case of Mexico," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 549-559, September.
    20. Raimundo Díaz-Díaz & Luis Muñoz & Daniel Pérez-González, 2017. "The Business Model Evaluation Tool for Smart Cities: Application to SmartSantander Use Cases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-30, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4610-:d:791664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.