IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3617-d774213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Active Lifestyle Post First Myocardial Infarction: A Comparison between Participants and Non-Participants of a Structured Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

Author

Listed:
  • Ran Wainer Shlomo

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel
    HaEmek Medical Center, Afula 1834111, Israel)

  • Rachel Kizony

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel
    Sheba Medical Center, Department of Occupational Therapy, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel)

  • Menachem Nahir

    (HaEmek Medical Center, Afula 1834111, Israel)

  • Liza Grosman-Rimon

    (Wingate Institute, The Academic College at Wingate, Netanya 4290200, Israel)

  • Einat Kodesh

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel)

Abstract

Following myocardial infarction (MI), impaired physical, mental, and cognitive functions can reduce participation in the community and diminish quality of life. This study aims to assess active lifestyle participation and functional performance in patients who were participants and non-participants in cardiac rehabilitation. A total of 71 patients were recruited, 6–10 months after the MI event; 38 chose to participate in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program, and 33 did not (NCR). Participation and activity patterns in instrumental activities of daily living, as well as physically demanding leisure activities and social activities, were evaluated using the Activity Card Sort (ACS). Hand grip force and timed up and go (TUG) were tested. A total of 74% of the CR group met physical activity recommendations and only 34% continued to smoke, compared to 39% and 71% in the NCR group, respectively. The CR group, compared to the NCR group, had higher levels of daily activity, social leisure, and physically demanding leisure activities ( p ≤ 0.001). Null differences between the NCR and CR groups were observed in grip strength and the TUG tests. The study highlighted community participation after MI. Based on a comparison between the groups, the study implies that patients choosing to participate in CR retained higher community participation levels and had better self-management of cardiovascular risk factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ran Wainer Shlomo & Rachel Kizony & Menachem Nahir & Liza Grosman-Rimon & Einat Kodesh, 2022. "Active Lifestyle Post First Myocardial Infarction: A Comparison between Participants and Non-Participants of a Structured Cardiac Rehabilitation Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-9, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3617-:d:774213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3617/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3617/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelly M. Everard & Helen W. Lach & Edwin B. Fisher & M. Carolyn Baum, 2000. "Relationship of Activity and Social Support to the Functional Health of Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 55(4), pages 208-212.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Change Zhu & Christine Walsh & Lulin Zhou & Xinjie Zhang, 2023. "Latent Classification Analysis of Leisure Activities and Their Impact on ADL, IADL and Cognitive Ability of Older Adults Based on CLHLS (2008–2018)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Luo, Ye & Zhang, Zhenmei & Gu, Danan, 2015. "Education and mortality among older adults in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 134-142.
    3. Dury, Sarah & Stas, Lara & Switsers, Lise & Duppen, Daan & Domènech-Abella, Joan & Dierckx, Eva & Donder, Liesbeth De, 2021. "Gender-related differences in the relationship between social and activity participation and health and subjective well-being in later life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Luis Aranda & Martin Siyaranamual, 2014. "Are Smarter People Better Samaritans? Effect of Cognitive Abilities on Pro-Social Behaviors," Working Papers 2014:06, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    5. Linda Kridahl, 2014. "Retirement and leisure: a longitudinal study using Swedish data," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 12(1), pages 141-168.
    6. Anna Darbonne & Bert Uchino & Anthony Ong, 2013. "What Mediates Links Between Age and Well-being? A Test of Social Support and Interpersonal Conflict as Potential Interpersonal Pathways," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 951-963, June.
    7. Nilgun Kuru & Gulumser Kublay, 2017. "The effect of laughter therapy on the quality of life of nursing home residents," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3354-3362, November.
    8. Esteban Calvo, 2006. "Does Working Longer Make People Healthier and Happier," Work Opportunity Briefs wob_2, Center for Retirement Research.
    9. Meliyanni Johar & Shiko Maruyama, 2014. "Does Coresidence Improve An Elderly Parent'S Health?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 965-983, September.
    10. Berry, Brandon & Apesoa-Varano, Ester Carolina & Gomez, Yarin, 2015. "How family members manage risk around functional decline: The autonomy management process in households facing dementia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 107-114.
    11. Esteban Calvo & Kelly Haverstick & Steven A. Sass, 2007. "What Makes Retirees Happier: A Gradual or 'Cold Turkey' Retirement?," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College wp2007-18, Center for Retirement Research, revised Oct 2007.
    12. Haustein, Sonja & Siren, Anu, 2014. "Seniors’ unmet mobility needs – how important is a driving licence?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 45-52.
    13. Sara A. Hoffman & Gwendolyn Ledford & Kenzie A. Cameron & Siobhan M. Phillips & Christine A. Pellegrini, 2019. "A qualitative exploration of social and environmental factors affecting diet and activity in knee replacement patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1156-1163, April.
    14. Walsh, Kieran & Gannon, Brenda, 2011. "Perceived neighbourhood context, disability onset and old age," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 631-636.
    15. Yen, Dorothy & Cohen, Geraldine & Wei, Liyuan & Asaad, Yousra, 2022. "Towards a framework of healthy aging practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 176-187.
    16. Stephanie A. Hicks & Karen L. Siedlecki, 2017. "Leisure Activity Engagement and Positive Affect Partially Mediate the Relationship Between Positive Views on Aging and Physical Health," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(2), pages 259-267.
    17. Nkechi S Owoo & Monica P Lambon-Quayefio, 2021. "Mixed methods exploration of Ghanaian women’s domestic work, childcare and effects on their mental health," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Maria Vozikaki & Manolis Linardakis & Katerina Micheli & Anastas Philalithis, 2017. "Activity Participation and Well-Being Among European Adults Aged 65 years and Older," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 769-795, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3617-:d:774213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.