IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p737-d721687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Type 1 Diabetes Mathematical Models Using Experimental Data

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Al Ali

    (Computational Science and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK
    Institute of Applied Research and Technology, Emirates Aviation University, Dubai 53044, United Arab Emirates
    Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Emirates Aviation University, Dubai 53044, United Arab Emirates
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Alireza Daneshkhah

    (Computational Science and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Abdesslam Boutayeb

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, University Mohamed Premier, P.O. Box 524, Oujda 60000, Morocco
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zindoga Mukandavire

    (Institute of Applied Research and Technology, Emirates Aviation University, Dubai 53044, United Arab Emirates
    Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Emirates Aviation University, Dubai 53044, United Arab Emirates
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes requires treatment with insulin injections and monitoring glucose levels in affected individuals. We explored the utility of two mathematical models in predicting glucose concentration levels in type 1 diabetic mice and determined disease pathways. We adapted two mathematical models, one with β -cells and the other with no β -cell component to determine their capability in predicting glucose concentration and determine type 1 diabetes pathways using published glucose concentration data for four groups of experimental mice. The groups of mice were numbered Mice Group 1–4, depending on the diabetes severity of each group, with severity increasing from group 1–4. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo method based on a Bayesian framework was used to fit the model to determine the best model structure. Akaike information criteria (AIC) and Bayesian information criteria (BIC) approaches were used to assess the best model structure for type 1 diabetes. In fitting the model with no β -cells to glucose level data, we varied insulin absorption rate and insulin clearance rate. However, the model with β -cells required more parameters to match the data and we fitted the β -cell glucose tolerance factor, whole body insulin clearance rate, glucose production rate, and glucose clearance rate. Fitting the models to the blood glucose concentration level gave the least difference in AIC of 1.2 , and a difference in BIC of 0.12 for Mice Group 4. The estimated AIC and BIC values were highest for Mice Group 1 than all other mice groups. The models gave substantial differences in AIC and BIC values for Mice Groups 1–3 ranging from 2.10 to 4.05 . Our results suggest that the model without β -cells provides a more suitable structure for modelling type 1 diabetes and predicting blood glucose concentration for hypoglycaemic episodes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Al Ali & Alireza Daneshkhah & Abdesslam Boutayeb & Zindoga Mukandavire, 2022. "Examining Type 1 Diabetes Mathematical Models Using Experimental Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:737-:d:721687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/737/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/737/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daneshkhah, Alireza & Bedford, Tim, 2013. "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of system availability using Gaussian processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 82-93.
    2. Zindoga Mukandavire & Farai Nyabadza & Noble J Malunguza & Diego F Cuadros & Tinevimbo Shiri & Godfrey Musuka, 2020. "Quantifying early COVID-19 outbreak transmission in South Africa and exploring vaccine efficacy scenarios," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Soetaert, Karline & Petzoldt, Thomas, 2010. "Inverse Modelling, Sensitivity and Monte Carlo Analysis in R Using Package FME," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i03).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad AlShurbaji & Lamis Abdul Kader & Hadia Hannan & Maruf Mortula & Ghaleb A. Husseini, 2023. "Comprehensive Study of a Diabetes Mellitus Mathematical Model Using Numerical Methods with Stability and Parametric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, W. & O’Neill, E. & Moncaster, A. & Reiner, D. & Guthrie, P., 2019. "Applying Bayesian Model Averaging to Characterise Urban Residential Stock Turnover Dynamics," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1986, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Hanson, Paul C. & Stillman, Aviah B. & Jia, Xiaowei & Karpatne, Anuj & Dugan, Hilary A. & Carey, Cayelan C. & Stachelek, Joseph & Ward, Nicole K. & Zhang, Yu & Read, Jordan S. & Kumar, Vipin, 2020. "Predicting lake surface water phosphorus dynamics using process-guided machine learning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).
    3. Nikolaos P. Rachaniotis & Thomas K. Dasaklis & Filippos Fotopoulos & Platon Tinios, 2021. "A Two-Phase Stochastic Dynamic Model for COVID-19 Mid-Term Policy Recommendations in Greece: A Pathway towards Mass Vaccination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Naudé, Wim & Cameron, Martin, 2020. "Failing to Pull Together: South Africa's Troubled Response to COVID-19," IZA Discussion Papers 13649, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Al Ali, Hannah & Daneshkhah, Alireza & Boutayeb, Abdesslam & Malunguza, Noble Jahalamajaha & Mukandavire, Zindoga, 2022. "Exploring dynamical properties of a Type 1 diabetes model using sensitivity approaches," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 324-342.
    6. Taffi, Marianna & Paoletti, Nicola & Liò, Pietro & Pucciarelli, Sandra & Marini, Mauro, 2015. "Bioaccumulation modelling and sensitivity analysis for discovering key players in contaminated food webs: The case study of PCBs in the Adriatic Sea," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 205-215.
    7. Lucash, Melissa S. & Marshall, Adrienne M. & Weiss, Shelby A. & McNabb, John W. & Nicolsky, Dmitry J. & Flerchinger, Gerald N. & Link, Timothy E. & Vogel, Jason G. & Scheller, Robert M. & Abramoff, Ro, 2023. "Burning trees in frozen soil: Simulating fire, vegetation, soil, and hydrology in the boreal forests of Alaska," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    8. Meier, Laura & Brauns, Mario & Grimm, Volker & Weitere, Markus & Frank, Karin, 2022. "MASTIFF: A mechanistic model for cross-scale analyses of the functioning of multiple stressed riverine ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    9. Hussnain Mukhtar & Yu-Pin Lin & Oleg V. Shipin & Joy R. Petway, 2017. "Modeling Nitrogen Dynamics in a Waste Stabilization Pond System Using Flexible Modeling Environment with MCMC," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Sehjeong Kim & Abdessamad Tridane, 2017. "Thalassemia in the United Arab Emirates: Why it can be prevented but not eradicated," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    11. Lee, Kyoungjae & Lee, Jaeyong & Dass, Sarat C., 2018. "Inference for differential equation models using relaxation via dynamical systems," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 116-134.
    12. Jinyoung Yang & Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, 2017. "Automatically tuned general-purpose MCMC via new adaptive diagnostics," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 315-348, March.
    13. repec:jss:jstsof:33:i09 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Soetaert, Karline & Petzoldt, Thomas & Setzer, R. Woodrow, 2010. "Solving Differential Equations in R: Package deSolve," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i09).
    15. McCullough, Ian M. & Dugan, Hilary A. & Farrell, Kaitlin J. & Morales-Williams, Ana M. & Ouyang, Zutao & Roberts, Derek & Scordo, Facundo & Bartlett, Sarah L. & Burke, Samantha M. & Doubek, Jonathan P, 2018. "Dynamic modeling of organic carbon fates in lake ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 386(C), pages 71-82.
    16. Zitrou, A. & Bedford, T. & Daneshkhah, A., 2013. "Robustness of maintenance decisions: Uncertainty modelling and value of information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 60-71.
    17. Venolia, Celeste T. & Lavaud, Romain & Green-Gavrielidis, Lindsay A. & Thornber, Carol & Humphries, Austin T., 2020. "Modeling the Growth of Sugar Kelp (Saccharina latissima) in Aquaculture Systems using Dynamic Energy Budget Theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).
    18. Kondakci, Suleyman, 2015. "Analysis of information security reliability: A tutorial," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 275-299.
    19. Haas, Marcelo B. & Guse, Björn & Pfannerstill, Matthias & Fohrer, Nicola, 2015. "Detection of dominant nitrate processes in ecohydrological modeling with temporal parameter sensitivity analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 314(C), pages 62-72.
    20. Daneshkhah, A. & Stocks, N.G. & Jeffrey, P., 2017. "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of optimised preventive maintenance strategies for deteriorating infrastructure assets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 33-45.
    21. Keane, Robert E. & McKenzie, Donald & Falk, Donald A. & Smithwick, Erica A.H. & Miller, Carol & Kellogg, Lara-Karena B., 2015. "Representing climate, disturbance, and vegetation interactions in landscape models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 33-47.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:737-:d:721687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.