IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p14819-d969351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthcare Equity and Commissioning: A Four-Year National Analysis of Portuguese Primary Healthcare Units

Author

Listed:
  • António Pereira

    (Family Health Unit, Unidade de Saúde Familiar Prelada, ACES Porto Ocidental, 4250-113 Porto, Portugal
    PHC—Commissioning Department, Northern Regional Administration of Health, 4000-447 Porto, Portugal
    CINTESIS—Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

  • André Biscaia

    (CINTESIS—Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
    Family Health Unit, Unidade de Saúde Familiar Marginal, ACES Cascais, ARS Lisboa e Vale do Tejo, 2765-618 São João do Estoril, Portugal)

  • Isis Calado

    (University College London Medical School, London WC1E 6DE, UK)

  • Alberto Freitas

    (CINTESIS—Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

  • Andreia Costa

    (Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon (ESEL), 1600-096 Lisbon, Portugal
    Católica Research Centre for Psychological, Family and Social Wellbeing, Faculdade de Ciências Humanas, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 1649-023 Lisbon, Portugal
    Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1099-085 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Anabela Coelho

    (Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Nursing Department, University of Évora, 7004-516 Evora, Portugal
    H&TRC—Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL—Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1990-096 Lisbon, Portugal
    Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1349-008 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

Equal and adequate access to healthcare is one of the pillars of Portuguese health policy. Despite the controversy over commissioning processes’ contribution to equity in health, this article aims to clarify the relationship between socio-economic factors and the results of primary healthcare (PHC) commissioning indicators through an analysis of four years of data from all PHC units in Portugal. The factor that presents a statistically significant relationship with a greater number of indicators is the organizational model. Since the reform of PHC services in 2005, a new type of unit was introduced: the family health unit (USF). At the time of the study, these units covered 58.1% of the population and achieved better indicator results. In most cases, the evolution of the results achieved by commissioning seems to be similar in different analyzed contexts. Nevertheless, the percentage of patients of a non-Portuguese nationality and the population density were analyzed, and a widening of discrepancies was observed in 23.3% of the cases. The commissioning indicators were statistically related to the studied context factors, and some of these, such as the nurse home visits indicator, are more sensitive to context than others. There is no evidence that the best results were achieved at the expense of worse healthcare being offered to vulnerable populations, and there was no association with a reduction in inequalities in healthcare. It would be valuable if the Portuguese Government could stimulate the increase in the number of working USFs, especially in low-density areas, considering that they can achieve better results with lower costs for medicines and diagnostic tests.

Suggested Citation

  • António Pereira & André Biscaia & Isis Calado & Alberto Freitas & Andreia Costa & Anabela Coelho, 2022. "Healthcare Equity and Commissioning: A Four-Year National Analysis of Portuguese Primary Healthcare Units," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14819-:d:969351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14819/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14819/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eddy van Doorslaer & Cristina Masseria, 2004. "Income-Related Inequality in the Use of Medical Care in 21 OECD Countries," OECD Health Working Papers 14, OECD Publishing.
    2. da Luz Pereira, António & Ramalho, André & Viana, João & Pinto Hespanhol, Alberto & Freitas, Alberto & Biscaia, André, 2021. "The effect of commissioning on Portuguese Primary Health Care units’ performance: A four-year national analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(6), pages 709-716.
    3. Bago d'Uva, Teresa & Jones, Andrew M. & van Doorslaer, Eddy, 2009. "Measurement of horizontal inequity in health care utilisation using European panel data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 280-289, March.
    4. Jens Matthias Arnold & Carlos Farinha Rodrigues, 2015. "Reducing inequality and poverty in Portugal," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1258, OECD Publishing.
    5. Elke Loeffler & Tony Bovaird, 2019. "Co-commissioning of public services and outcomes in the UK: Bringing co-production into the strategic commissioning cycle," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 241-252, May.
    6. Alessandra Buja & Giuliana Solinas & Modesta Visca & Bruno Federico & Rosa Gini & Vincenzo Baldo & Paolo Francesconi & Gino Sartor & Mariadonata Bellentani & Gianfranco Damiani, 2016. "Prevalence of Heart Failure and Adherence to Process Indicators: Which Socio-Demographic Determinants are Involved?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tavares, Lara Patrício & Zantomio, Francesca, 2017. "Inequity in healthcare use among older people after 2008: The case of southern European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(10), pages 1063-1071.
    2. García-Gómez, Pilar & Hernández-Quevedo, Cristina & Jiménez-Rubio, Dolores & Oliva-Moreno, Juan, 2015. "Inequity in long-term care use and unmet need: Two sides of the same coin," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 147-158.
    3. Marion Devaux, 2015. "Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(1), pages 21-33, January.
    4. Kaarboe, Oddvar & Siciliani, Luigi, 2023. "Contracts for primary and secondary care physicians and equity-efficiency trade-offs," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Sato, Azusa, 2012. "Do Inequalities in Health Care Utilization in Developing Countries Change When We Take into Account Traditional Medicines?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(11), pages 2275-2289.
    6. Xin Xie & Qunhong Wu & Yanhua Hao & Hui Yin & Wenqi Fu & Ning Ning & Ling Xu & Chaojie Liu & Ye Li & Zheng Kang & Changzhi He & Guoxiang Liu, 2014. "Identifying Determinants of Socioeconomic Inequality in Health Service Utilization among Patients with Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Jones, Andrew M. & Rice, Nigel & Robone, Silvana & Dias, Pedro Rosa, 2011. "Inequality and polarisation in health systems' responsiveness: A cross-country analysis," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 616-625, July.
    8. Jonas Fooken & Varinder Jeet, 2022. "Using Australian panel data to account for unobserved factors in measuring inequities for different channels of healthcare utilization," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(4), pages 717-728, June.
    9. Layte, Richard & Nolan, Anne, 2013. "Income-Related Inequity in the Use of GP Services: A Comparison of Ireland and Scotland," Papers WP454, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    10. Grasdal, Astrid & Monstad, Karin, 2009. "Inequity in the use of physician services in Norway. Changing patterns over time," Working Papers in Economics 05/09, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
    11. Richard Layte & Anne Nolan, 2015. "Income-related inequity in the use of GP services by children: a comparison of Ireland and Scotland," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(5), pages 489-506, June.
    12. Eric French & Elaine Kelly & Richard Cookson & Carol Propper & Miqdad Asaria & Rosalind Raine, 2016. "Socio‐Economic Inequalities in Health Care in England," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 37, pages 371-403, September.
    13. Siskou, Olga & Kaitelidou, Daphne & Papakonstantinou, Vasiliki & Liaropoulos, Lycourgos, 2008. "Private health expenditure in the Greek health care system: Where truth ends and the myth begins," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2-3), pages 282-293, December.
    14. Hoeck, Sarah & François, Guido & Van der Heyden, Johan & Geerts, Joanna & Van Hal, Guido, 2011. "Healthcare utilisation among the Belgian elderly in relation to their socio-economic status," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 174-182, February.
    15. World Bank, 2008. "Evidence on Cost-sharing in Health Care : Applications to Hungary : Executive Summary," World Bank Publications - Reports 12854, The World Bank Group.
    16. Michala Lustigova & Dagmar Dzurova & Claudia Costa & Paula Santana, 2019. "Health Disparities in Czechia and Portugal at Country and Municipality Levels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Erik Schokkaert & Tom Van Ourti & Diana De Graeve & Ann Lecluyse & Carine Van de Voorde, 2010. "Supplemental health insurance and equality of access in Belgium," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(4), pages 377-395, April.
    18. Dorota Elżbieta Piotrowska & Dorota Jankowska & Dorota Huzarska & Andrzej Stanisław Szpak & Bartosz Pędziński, 2020. "Socioeconomic inequalities in use and non-use of dental services in Poland," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(5), pages 637-647, June.
    19. Massimo Baldini & Gilberto Turati, 2006. "Long-run and short-run constraints in the access to private health care services: evidence from selected european countries," Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) 0016, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    20. Jiménez Rubio, Dolores, 2008. "Equity in the Use of Health Care Services by Immigrants in the Spanish National Health Care System," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 26, pages 211-230, Septiembr.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14819-:d:969351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.