IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7171-d836576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Gap of Age-Friendliness among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Findings from Malaysia, a Middle-Income Country

Author

Listed:
  • Chee-Tao Chang

    (Clinical Research Centre, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ministry of Health, 30450 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xin-Jie Lim

    (Clinical Research Centre, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ministry of Health, 30450 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Premaa Supramaniam

    (Clinical Research Centre, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ministry of Health, 30450 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Chii-Chii Chew

    (Clinical Research Centre, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ministry of Health, 30450 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Lay-Ming Ding

    (Perak State Health Department, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Jalan Koo Chong Kong, 30000 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Philip Rajan

    (Clinical Research Centre, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ministry of Health, 30450 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia)

Abstract

Background: The United Nations predicts that the global population aged 65 years or above will double from 703 million in 2019 to 1.5 billion by 2050. In Malaysia, the older population has reached 2.4 million, accounting for nearly 8% of the population. This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions of the elderly on the importance and availability of the age-friendly features in eight domains specified by the Global Network of Age-Friendly City and Communities. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted by structured face-to-face and or telephone interviews. Gap score analysis was performed for 32 items of the 8 age-friendly domains. The gap scores were categorized as follows: 0 = not important OR important and element available; 1 = important but unsure whether the element is available; 2 = important but element not available. The gap scores were then dichotomized into “yes” and “no”, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was subsequently performed. Results: From the 1061 respondents, the housing (55.4%) and transportation (50.7%) domains reported the highest mean perceived gap scores. Out of the 32 elements, the highest mean gap percent scores were observed in elderly priority parking bays (83.8%), home visits by healthcare professionals (78.9%), financial assistance for home modification and purchase (66.3%), and affordable housing options (63.6%). Respondents in the city center reported higher gap scores for modified restrooms, parks, volunteer activities, and the internet; respondents in the non-city center reported higher gap scores for nursing homes, healthcare professionals, and cultural celebrations. Age, location, marital status, income, duration of stay, physical exercise, internet access, and intention to continue working were found to be associated with a higher perceived gap in specific domains. Conclusion: The most significant unmet needs were detected in the housing, transportation, and employment opportunities domains. Considerable disparities in the perceived gap were detected between the older population in the city center and non-city center. To address shortcomings in the local age-friendly setting, coordinated municipal policies, political commitment, and benchmarking of existing age-friendly cities are warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Chee-Tao Chang & Xin-Jie Lim & Premaa Supramaniam & Chii-Chii Chew & Lay-Ming Ding & Philip Rajan, 2022. "Perceived Gap of Age-Friendliness among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Findings from Malaysia, a Middle-Income Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7171-:d:836576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7171/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7171/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Lux & Petr Sunega, 2014. "The impact of housing tenure in supporting ageing in place: exploring the links between housing systems and housing options for the elderly," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 30-55, January.
    2. Vega, W.A. & Wallace, S.P., 2016. "Affordable housing: A key lever to community health for older americans," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(4), pages 635-636.
    3. Martin Lux & Petr Sunega, 2014. "The impact of housing tenure in supporting ageing in place: exploring the links between housing systems and housing options for the elderly," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 30-55, January.
    4. Mulley, Corinne & Nelson, John D., 2009. "Flexible transport services: A new market opportunity for public transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 39-45.
    5. Jaap Oude Mulders & Hendrik Dalen & Kène Henkens & Joop Schippers, 2014. "How Likely are Employers to Rehire Older Workers After Mandatory Retirement? A Vignette Study Among Managers," De Economist, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 415-431, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Flaviana Rotaru & Andreea Matei & Sorana D. Bolboacă & Ariana Anamaria Cordoș & Adriana Elena Bulboacă & Călin Muntean, 2024. "Age-Inclusive Healthcare Sustainability: Romania’s Regulatory and Initiatives Landscape in the European Union Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adriana Luciano & Federica Pascale & Francesco Polverino & Alison Pooley, 2020. "Measuring Age-Friendly Housing: A Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-35, January.
    2. Jokinen, Jani-Pekka & Sihvola, Teemu & Mladenovic, Milos N., 2019. "Policy lessons from the flexible transport service pilot Kutsuplus in the Helsinki Capital Region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 123-133.
    3. Magalhães, David José Ahouagi Vaz de & Rivera-Gonzalez, Carlos, 2021. "Car users’ attitudes towards an enhanced bus system to mitigate urban congestion in a developing country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 452-464.
    4. Aurélie Mahieux & Odile Heddebaut, 2013. "Connecting mobility servicesand spatial territory typology: an application to a former coal mining area in France," Post-Print hal-00870563, HAL.
    5. Preston, John, 2016. "Big buses in a small country: The prospects for bus services in Wales," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 379-387.
    6. Dikas, G. & Minis, I., 2014. "Scheduled paratransit transport systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 18-34.
    7. Na’Taki Osborne Jelks & Viniece Jennings & Alessandro Rigolon, 2021. "Green Gentrification and Health: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Grazia Speranza, M., 2018. "Trends in transportation and logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 830-836.
    9. Marlin W. Ulmer & Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 2017. "On the Value and Challenge of Real-Time Information in Dynamic Dispatching of Service Vehicles," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(3), pages 161-171, June.
    10. Hiroaki Nishiuchi & Yasuyuki Kobayashi & Tomoyuki Todoroki & Tomoya Kawasaki, 2018. "Impact analysis of reductions in tram services in rural areas in Japan using smart card data," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 291-309, August.
    11. Becker, Henrik & Becker, Felix & Abe, Ryosuke & Bekhor, Shlomo & Belgiawan, Prawira F. & Compostella, Junia & Frazzoli, Emilio & Fulton, Lewis M. & Guggisberg Bicudo, Davi & Murthy Gurumurthy, Krishna, 2020. "Impact of vehicle automation and electric propulsion on production costs for mobility services worldwide," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 105-126.
    12. Wong, Yale Z. & Hensher, David A. & Mulley, Corinne, 2020. "Mobility as a service (MaaS): Charting a future context," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 5-19.
    13. Tomasz Kwarcinski, 2020. "Transport on Demand in the Opinion of Users: A Case Study for Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 462-475.
    14. Sohani Liyanage & Hussein Dia & Rusul Abduljabbar & Saeed Asadi Bagloee, 2019. "Flexible Mobility On-Demand: An Environmental Scan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-39, February.
    15. J. Tom Mueller & Matthew M. Brooks & José D. Pacas, 2022. "Cost of Living Variation, Nonmetropolitan America, and Implications for the Supplemental Poverty Measure," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(4), pages 1501-1523, August.
    16. van Engelen, Matti & Cats, Oded & Post, Henk & Aardal, Karen, 2018. "Enhancing flexible transport services with demand-anticipatory insertion heuristics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 110-121.
    17. Caliendo, Marco & Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Pfeifer, Harald & Uhlendorff, Arne & Wehner, Caroline, 2024. "Managers’ risk preferences and firm training investments," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Sohani Liyanage & Hussein Dia, 2020. "An Agent-Based Simulation Approach for Evaluating the Performance of On-Demand Bus Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Lisa Bauchinger & Anna Reichenberger & Bryonny Goodwin-Hawkins & Jurij Kobal & Mojca Hrabar & Theresia Oedl-Wieser, 2021. "Developing Sustainable and Flexible Rural–Urban Connectivity through Complementary Mobility Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.
    20. Hu, Lingqian & Schneider, Robert J., 2017. "Different ways to get to the same workplace: How does workplace location relate to commuting by different income groups?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 106-115.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7171-:d:836576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.