IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6388-d823099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will Perceived Risk of COVID-19 Move Exhibition Visitors from On-Site to Virtual? Focusing on Exhibition Quarantine Service Quality and Switching Intention

Author

Listed:
  • Mi-Hwa Jang

    (Department of Industry-University Cooperation, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea)

  • Eui-Yul Choi

    (Department of Marine Sport Sciences, Korea Maritime & Ocean University, Busan 49112, Korea)

Abstract

COVID-19 has shifted people’s activities from the real world to the virtual world in many fields, such as conferences, shopping, education, and more. In the field of MICE, however, exhibitions have been held steadily since the second half of 2020 in the form of on-site exhibitions. The exhibition organizers and related authorities have tried to attract exhibitors and visitors to the exhibition hall by providing exhibition quarantine services. Moreover, despite various perceived risks during the COVID-19 period, exhibition visitors continue to visit the exhibition. This study, therefore, paid attention to the psychological factors of visitors who consistently visit on-site exhibitions even during the pandemic. In addition to the perceived risks, this study tried to examine the quality of exhibition quarantine services and switching intention of visitors, and to analyze the relationships between them. A survey of 167 people who visited the camping exhibition and well-food exhibition held in June 2021 found that they would not visit the exhibition due to the functional and financial risk of the exhibition rather than the risk of the virus. On the other hand, it was found that visitors who felt the social risk of COVID-19 valued the quality of exhibition quarantine service. Furthermore, the study found that the quarantine service quality lowered switching intention. Therefore, the study suggests that exhibition organizers should think about ways to strengthen the most essential characteristics of on-site exhibitions along with appropriate quarantine measures to induce steady visits even during the pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi-Hwa Jang & Eui-Yul Choi, 2022. "Will Perceived Risk of COVID-19 Move Exhibition Visitors from On-Site to Virtual? Focusing on Exhibition Quarantine Service Quality and Switching Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6388-:d:823099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6388/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6388/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Kien Pham & Thu Ha Do Thi & Thu Hoai Ha Le, 2020. "A study on the COVID-19 awareness affecting the consumer perceived benefits of online shopping in Vietnam," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1846882-184, January.
    2. Jones, Michael A. & Mothersbaugh, David L. & Beatty, Sharon E., 2002. "Why customers stay: measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 441-450, June.
    3. Sufyan Habib & Nawaf N. Hamadneh, 2021. "Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers Technology Acceptance in Online Grocery Adoption amid COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Yanhong & Liu, Luning & Zheng, Dequan & Li, Bin, 2023. "Estimating travellers’ value when purchasing auxiliary services in the airline industry based on the RFM model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Xia, Lan & Kukar-Kinney, Monika, 2014. "For our valued customers only: Examining consumer responses to preferential treatment practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2368-2375.
    3. Van den Poel, Dirk & Lariviere, Bart, 2004. "Customer attrition analysis for financial services using proportional hazard models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(1), pages 196-217, August.
    4. Budiarto Tedja & Mochammad Musadieq & Andriani Kusumawati & Edy Yulianto, 2024. "Systematic literature review using PRISMA: exploring the influence of service quality and perceived value on satisfaction and intention to continue relationship," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Sander Triest & Maurice Bun & Erik Raaij & Maarten Vernooij, 2009. "The impact of customer-specific marketing expenses on customer retention and customer profitability," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 125-138, June.
    6. Anupam Singh & Priyanka Verma, 2018. "Driving Brand Value Through CSR Initiatives: An Empirical Study in Indian Perspective," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(1), pages 85-98, February.
    7. Stephen Littlechild, 2020. "An Overall Customer Satisfaction score for GB energy suppliers," Working Papers EPRG2027, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    8. Dwayne D. Gremler & Yves Vaerenbergh & Elisabeth C. Brüggen & Kevin P. Gwinner, 2020. "Understanding and managing customer relational benefits in services: a meta-analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 565-583, May.
    9. Lin, Tung-Ching & Huang, Shiu-Li & Hsu, Chieh-Ju, 2015. "A dual-factor model of loyalty to IT product – The case of smartphones," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 215-228.
    10. John R. Hauser & Guilherme (Gui) Liberali & Glen L. Urban, 2014. "Website Morphing 2.0: Switching Costs, Partial Exposure, Random Exit, and When to Morph," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1594-1616, June.
    11. Martin, William C. & Ponder, Nicole & Lueg, Jason E., 2009. "Price fairness perceptions and customer loyalty in a retail context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 588-593, June.
    12. Papageorgiou Í. Athina, 2016. "Service Quality And Customer Satisfaction In Air Transportation," Tourism Research Institute, Journal of Tourism Research, vol. 15(1), pages 3-20, June.
    13. Shih-Wei Chou & Chia-Shiang Hsu, 2016. "Understanding online repurchase intention: social exchange theory and shopping habit," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 19-45, February.
    14. Singh, Jaywant & Shukla, Paurav & Schlegelmilch, Bodo B., 2022. "Desire, need, and obligation: Examining commitment to luxury brands in emerging markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3).
    15. Xiong, Yanyan & Cui, Xue & Yu, Liuming, 2024. "Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on online consumption share: Evidence from China's mobile payment data," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Nogata, Daisuke, 2022. "Determinants of household switching between natural gas suppliers: Evidence from Japan," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    17. White, Allyn & Breazeale, Michael & Collier, Joel E., 2012. "The Effects of Perceived Fairness on Customer Responses to Retailer SST Push Policies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 250-261.
    18. Basiony, Abd Elazim & abd alla, Ghada & shaker El Sayed, Alaa, 2014. "Evaluating Tourism Service Quality Provided to the European Tourist “Applied on the British tourist"," MPRA Paper 57164, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2014.
    19. Picón-Berjoyo, Araceli & Ruiz-Moreno, Carolina & Castro, Ignacio, 2016. "A mediating and multigroup analysis of customer loyalty," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 701-713.
    20. Mutum, Dilip & Mohd Ghazali, Ezlika & Nguyen, Bang & Arnott, David, 2014. "Online loyalty and its interaction with switching barriers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 942-949.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6388-:d:823099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.