IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i10p5811-d812340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermal Performance of School Buildings: Impacts beyond Thermal Comfort

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Su

    (School of Architecture, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland 0600, New Zealand)

  • Renata Jadresin Milic

    (School of Architecture, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland 0600, New Zealand)

  • Peter McPherson

    (School of Architecture, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland 0600, New Zealand)

  • Lian Wu

    (School of Healthcare and Social Practice, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland 0600, New Zealand)

Abstract

Based on field study data regarding the winter indoor thermal environment of three classrooms with different building envelopes, this study compared and evaluated these environments, not only related to students’ thermal comfort but also to their health. The inadequacy of the conventional New Zealand school building for maintaining a comfortable and healthy winter indoor thermal environment has been identified. A classroom with thermal mass had 31%, 34% and 9% more time than a classroom without thermal mass when indoor temperatures met 16 °C 18 °C and 20 °C respectively and has 21.4% more time than the classroom without thermal mass when indoor relative humidity was in the optimal range of 40% to 60%, in a temperate climate with a mild and humid winter. Adding thermal mass to school building envelopes should be considered as a strategy to improve the winter indoor thermal environment in future school design and development. Adding thermal mass to a school building with sufficient insulation can not only increase winter indoor mean air temperature but can also reduce the fluctuation of indoor air temperatures. This can significantly reduce the incidence of very low indoor temperature and very high indoor relative humidity, and significantly improve the indoor thermal environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Su & Renata Jadresin Milic & Peter McPherson & Lian Wu, 2022. "Thermal Performance of School Buildings: Impacts beyond Thermal Comfort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:5811-:d:812340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/5811/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/5811/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Djongyang, Noël & Tchinda, René & Njomo, Donatien, 2010. "Thermal comfort: A review paper," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2626-2640, December.
    2. Marsha K. Morgan & Nancy K. Wilson & Jane C. Chuang, 2014. "Exposures of 129 Preschool Children to Organochlorines, Organophosphates, Pyrethroids, and Acid Herbicides at Their Homes and Daycares in North Carolina," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Liang, Han-Hsi & Lin, Tzu-Ping & Hwang, Ruey-Lung, 2012. "Linking occupants’ thermal perception and building thermal performance in naturally ventilated school buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 355-363.
    4. Bin Su & Lian Wu, 2020. "Occupants’ Health and Their Living Conditions of Remote Indigenous Communities in New Zealand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenbo Li & Jiaqi Wu & Wenting Xu & Ye Zhong & Zhihao Wang, 2022. "How Thermal Perceptual Schema Mediates Landscape Quality Evaluation and Activity Willingness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-27, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Liu & Yan, Haiyan & Lam, Joseph C., 2014. "Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 164-173.
    2. Buratti, C. & Ricciardi, P. & Vergoni, M., 2013. "HVAC systems testing and check: A simplified model to predict thermal comfort conditions in moderate environments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 117-127.
    3. Zomorodian, Zahra Sadat & Tahsildoost, Mohammad & Hafezi, Mohammadreza, 2016. "Thermal comfort in educational buildings: A review article," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 895-906.
    4. Laura J. Elstub & Shimra J. Fine & Karl E. Zelik, 2021. "Exoskeletons and Exosuits Could Benefit from Mode-Switching Body Interfaces That Loosen/Tighten to Improve Thermal Comfort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Girish Rentala & Yimin Zhu & Neil M. Johannsen, 2021. "Impact of Outdoor Temperature Variations on Thermal State in Experiments Using Immersive Virtual Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-36, September.
    6. Ribeiro, Thatiana Jessica da Silva & Mady, Carlos Eduardo Keutenedjian, 2022. "Comparison among exergy analysis methods applied to a human body thermal model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    7. Bruno Malet-Damour & Jean-Pierre Habas & Dimitri Bigot, 2023. "Is Loose-Fill Plastic Waste an Opportunity for Thermal Insulation in Cold and Humid Tropical Climates?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Djamila, Harimi, 2017. "Indoor thermal comfort predictions: Selected issues and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 569-580.
    9. Francesco Asdrubali & Cinzia Buratti & Franco Cotana & Giorgio Baldinelli & Michele Goretti & Elisa Moretti & Catia Baldassarri & Elisa Belloni & Francesco Bianchi & Antonella Rotili & Marco Vergoni &, 2013. "Evaluation of Green Buildings’ Overall Performance through in Situ Monitoring and Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Amir Faraji & Maria Rashidi & Fatemeh Rezaei & Payam Rahnamayiezekavat, 2023. "A Meta-Synthesis Review of Occupant Comfort Assessment in Buildings (2002–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-36, February.
    11. Feng, Yanxiao & Liu, Shichao & Wang, Julian & Yang, Jing & Jao, Ying-Ling & Wang, Nan, 2022. "Data-driven personal thermal comfort prediction: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Michael Short & Sergio Rodriguez & Richard Charlesworth & Tracey Crosbie & Nashwan Dawood, 2019. "Optimal Dispatch of Aggregated HVAC Units for Demand Response: An Industry 4.0 Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Van Craenendonck, Stijn & Lauriks, Leen & Vuye, Cedric & Kampen, Jarl, 2018. "A review of human thermal comfort experiments in controlled and semi-controlled environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3365-3378.
    14. Enescu, Diana, 2017. "A review of thermal comfort models and indicators for indoor environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1353-1379.
    15. Escandón, Rocío & Suárez, Rafael & Sendra, Juan José, 2019. "Field assessment of thermal comfort conditions and energy performance of social housing: The case of hot summers in the Mediterranean climate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 377-392.
    16. Azar, Elie & Nikolopoulou, Christina & Papadopoulos, Sokratis, 2016. "Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 926-937.
    17. Ren, Zhengen & Chen, Dong, 2018. "Modelling study of the impact of thermal comfort criteria on housing energy use in Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 152-166.
    18. Lin, Haiyang & Wang, Qinxing & Wang, Yu & Liu, Yiling & Sun, Qie & Wennersten, Ronald, 2017. "The energy-saving potential of an office under different pricing mechanisms – Application of an agent-based model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 248-258.
    19. Haider Latif & Samira Rahnama & Alessandro Maccarini & Goran Hultmark & Peter V. Nielsen & Alireza Afshari, 2022. "Precision Ventilation in an Open-Plan Office: A New Application of Active Chilled Beam (ACB) with a JetCone Feature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Omar al-Ani & Sanjoy Das & Hongyu Wu, 2023. "Imitation Learning with Deep Attentive Tabular Neural Networks for Environmental Prediction and Control in Smart Home," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:5811-:d:812340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.