IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i9p4797-d546973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Ecological Corridors and Networks in Mountainous Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Di Zhou

    (Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China)

  • Wei Song

    (Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Since the 1950s, human activities have been driving economic development and land changes, hindering the conservation of biological habitats and landscape connectivity. Constructing ecological networks is an effective means to avoid habitat destruction and fragmentation. Mountain areas are hotspots of biological habitats and biodiversity; however, the pace of urbanization in mountain areas is also accelerating. To protect an ecosystem more effectively, it is necessary to identify ecological corridors and ecological networks. Therefore, based on the Minimal Cumulative Resistance model and taking Chongqing in China as an example, the identification of potential ecological corridors and the construction of an ecological network in Chongqing were realized using the Linkage Mapper software. The results were as follows: (1) From 2005 to 2015, the patch area of cultivated land and grassland in Chongqing decreased by 0.08% and 1.46%, respectively, while that of built-up areas increased by 1.5%. The fragmentation degree of cultivated land was higher, and the internal connectivity of forestry areas was worse. (2) In total, 24 ecological sources were selected, and 87 potential ecological corridors and 35 ecological nodes were generated using the Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis and the Conefor2.6 software. The total length of the ecological network in Chongqing is 2524.34 km, with an average corridor length of 29.02 km. (3) The overall complexity and network efficiency are high, but the spatial distribution of ecological corridors is uneven, especially in the southwest of Chongqing.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Zhou & Wei Song, 2021. "Identifying Ecological Corridors and Networks in Mountainous Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4797-:d:546973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4797/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4797/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Feng & Ye, Yaping & Song, Bowen & Wang, Rusong, 2015. "Evaluation of urban suitable ecological land based on the minimum cumulative resistance model: A case study from Changzhou, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 194-203.
    2. Troumbis, Andreas Y. & Zevgolis, Yiannis, 2020. "Biodiversity crime and economic crisis: Hidden mechanisms of misuse of ecosystem goods in Greece," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Hui Shi & Tiange Shi & Zhaoping Yang & Zhi Wang & Fang Han & Cuirong Wang, 2018. "Effect of Roads on Ecological Corridors Used for Wildlife Movement in a Natural Heritage Site," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne & Weibel, Bettina, 2020. "Global assessment of mountain ecosystem services using earth observation data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    5. Su, Kai & Yu, Qiang & Yue, Depeng & Zhang, Qibin & Yang, Lan & Liu, Zhili & Niu, Teng & Sun, Xiaoting, 2019. "Simulation of a forest-grass ecological network in a typical desert oasis based on multiple scenes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    6. Liu, Gengyuan & Yang, Zhifeng & Chen, Bin & Zhang, Lixiao & Zhang, Yan & Su, Meirong, 2015. "An Ecological Network Perspective in Improving Reserve Design and Connectivity: A Case Study of Wuyishan Nature Reserve in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 185-194.
    7. Yanjie Zhang & Wei Song, 2020. "Identify Ecological Corridors and Build Potential Ecological Networks in Response to Recent Land Cover Changes in Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Haifeng Li & Wenbo Chen & Wei He, 2015. "Planning of Green Space Ecological Network in Urban Areas: An Example of Nanchang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Li Peng & Tiantian Chen & Shaoquan Liu, 2016. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Drivers of Farmland Changes in Panxi Mountainous Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, November.
    10. De Montis, Andrea & Ganciu, Amedeo & Cabras, Matteo & Bardi, Antonietta & Peddio, Valentina & Caschili, Simone & Massa, Pierangelo & Cocco, Chiara & Mulas, Maurizio, 2019. "Resilient ecological networks: A comparative approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiangshou Dong & Quanzhi Yuan & Yaowen Kou & Shujun Li & Ping Ren, 2023. "Distribution and Ecological Network Construction of National Natural Protected Areas in the Upper Reaches of Yangtze River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Caihong Yang & Huijun Guo & Xiaoyuan Huang & Yanxia Wang & Xiaona Li & Xinyuan Cui, 2022. "Ecological Network Construction of a National Park Based on MSPA and MCR Models: An Example of the Proposed National Parks of “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Yihe Huang & Shouyun Shen & Wenmin Hu & Yurou Li & Guo Li, 2022. "Construction of Cultural Heritage Tourism Corridor for the Dissemination of Historical Culture: A Case Study of Typical Mountainous Multi-Ethnic Area in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Qian Zuo & Yong Zhou & Jingyi Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization Strategy of an Ecological Network in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in Southwestern Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Xue Miao & Congbin Leng & Shiyu Dai & Jing Jin & Jiansong Peng, 2023. "Construction of Multi-Level Ecological Security Pattern for World Natural Heritage Sites from the Perspective of Coupling and Coordination between Humans and Nature: A Case Study of Shilin Yi Autonomo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Han Li & Tian Zhang & Xiaoshu Cao & Lingling Yao, 2023. "Active Utilization of Linear Cultural Heritage Based on Regional Ecological Security Pattern along the Straight Road (Zhidao) of the Qin Dynasty in Shaanxi Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haochen Yu & Jiu Huang & Chuning Ji & Zi’ao Li, 2021. "Construction of a Landscape Ecological Network for a Large-Scale Energy and Chemical Industrial Base: A Case Study of Ningdong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Liu Yang & Mengmeng Suo & Shunqian Gao & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Construction of an Ecological Network Based on an Integrated Approach and Circuit Theory: A Case Study of Panzhou in Guizhou Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Yichen Yan & Hongrun Ju & Shengrui Zhang & Guokun Chen, 2021. "The Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Coastal Areas Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment—A Case Study of Jiaodong Peninsula, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Men, Dan & Pan, Jinghu, 2023. "Ecological network identification and connectivity robustness evaluation in the Yellow River Basin under a multi-scenario simulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    5. Qian Zuo & Yong Zhou & Jingyi Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization Strategy of an Ecological Network in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in Southwestern Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, August.
    6. Zhenzhen Yuan & Weijie Li & Yong Wang & Dayun Zhu & Qiuhong Wang & Yan Liu & Lingyan Zhou, 2022. "Ecosystem Health Evaluation and Ecological Security Patterns Construction Based on VORSD and Circuit Theory: A Case Study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Rong Guo & Tong Wu & Mengran Liu & Mengshi Huang & Luigi Stendardo & Yutong Zhang, 2019. "The Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Pattern in the Harbin-Changchun Urban Agglomeration, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Gao, Yan & Liu, Gengyuan & Casazza, Marco & Hao, Yan & Zhang, Yan & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2018. "Economy-pollution nexus model of cities at river basin scale based on multi-agent simulation: A conceptual framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 379(C), pages 22-38.
    9. Yiming Wei & Hongwei Wang & Bo Tan & Mengqi Xue & Yucong Yin, 2022. "Analysis of the Spatial Differentiation and Development Optimization of Towns’ Livable Quality in Aksu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Stefano Duglio & Giulia Salotti & Giulia Mascadri, 2023. "Conditions for Operating in Marginal Mountain Areas: The Local Farmer’s Perspective," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Yayan Lu & Xiaoliang Xu & Junhong Zhao & Fang Han, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Mountainous Ecosystem Services in an Arid Region and Its Influencing Factors: A Case Study of the Tianshan Mountains in Xinjiang," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Yihe Huang & Shouyun Shen & Wenmin Hu & Yurou Li & Guo Li, 2022. "Construction of Cultural Heritage Tourism Corridor for the Dissemination of Historical Culture: A Case Study of Typical Mountainous Multi-Ethnic Area in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Zichun Yan & Ninglong You & Lu Wang & Chengwei Lan, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Road Network on Urban Landscape Ecological Risk Based on Corridor Cutting Degree Model in Fuzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Lingfan Ju & Yan Liu & Jin Yang & Mingshun Xiang & Qing Xiang & Wenkai Hu & Zhengyi Ding, 2023. "Construction of Nature Reserves’ Ecological Security Pattern Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Garze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Xiaoning Hu & Meizi Si & Han Luo & Mancai Guo & Jijun Wang, 2019. "The Method and Model of Ecological Technology Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Yayan Lu & Junhong Zhao & Jianwei Qi & Tianyu Rong & Zhi Wang & Zhaoping Yang & Fang Han, 2022. "Monitoring the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Habitat Quality and Its Driving Factors Based on the Coupled NDVI-InVEST Model: A Case Study from the Tianshan Mountains in Xinjiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Caihong Yang & Huijun Guo & Xiaoyuan Huang & Yanxia Wang & Xiaona Li & Xinyuan Cui, 2022. "Ecological Network Construction of a National Park Based on MSPA and MCR Models: An Example of the Proposed National Parks of “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Zhang, Zuo & Li, Jiaming & Luo, Xiang & Li, Chongming & Zhang, Lu, 2020. "Urban lake spatial openness and relationship with neighboring land prices: Exploratory geovisual analytics for essential policy insights," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Xiaoping Zhou & Duanshuai Shen & Xiaokun Gu, 2022. "Influences of Land Policy on Urban Ecological Corridors Governance: A Case Study from Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Natalia Fumagalli & Matteo Maccarini & Roberto Rovelli & Rita Berto & Giulio Senes, 2020. "An Exploratory Study of Users’ Preference for Different Planting Combinations along Rural Greenways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4797-:d:546973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.