IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9136-d871768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction of an Ecological Network Based on an Integrated Approach and Circuit Theory: A Case Study of Panzhou in Guizhou Province

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Yang

    (School of Public Administration, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Mengmeng Suo

    (School of Public Administration, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Shunqian Gao

    (School of Public Administration, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Hongzan Jiao

    (Department of Urban Planning, School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    Engineering Research Center of Human Settlements and Environment of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

Protecting ecological security has become the backbone of social and economic development since declines in ecological quality due to an increase in human dominance over the natural environment. The establishment of ecological networks is an effective, comprehensive spatial regulation means to ensure regional ecological security. Panzhou city, as a case study, is a typical karst county and has been confronted with the pressure of ecological degradation in recent decades. In this study, an integrated approach combining ecological quality (EQ), ecosystem function importance (EFI), and morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) was developed to determine the ecological sources. Ecological corridors, ecological pinch areas, and ecological barriers were extracted using circuit theory to identify the restored and conserved priority areas of ecological security patterns. The results showed that (1) the remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) and EFI exhibited typical geographical distributions, with the highest values concentrated in the northern and southern parts of the study area and the lowest values scattered in the middle part; (2) 26 patches with forestland, grassland, and waterbodies as the main land cover types were selected as the ecological sources; (3) 63 ecological corridors, composed of 45 key ecological corridors and 18 inactive ecological corridors, were extracted, accounting for 203.12 km and 163.31 km, respectively; (4) 82.76 km 2 of pinch areas and 320.29 km 2 of barriers were identified, both of which were distributed on key ecological corridors and played different roles in ecological security; and (5) 4 types of ecological security zones were established according to ecological sources, corridors, pinch areas, and barriers. This integrated approach provides a scientific method for the identification and implementation of ecological networks that can contribute to protecting regional ecological security. Our findings can serve as applicable and reasonable guidance to land administrators and policy-makers for adopting suitable territorial spatial planning, urban planning, green cities, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Yang & Mengmeng Suo & Shunqian Gao & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Construction of an Ecological Network Based on an Integrated Approach and Circuit Theory: A Case Study of Panzhou in Guizhou Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9136-:d:871768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9136/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9136/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Feng & Ye, Yaping & Song, Bowen & Wang, Rusong, 2015. "Evaluation of urban suitable ecological land based on the minimum cumulative resistance model: A case study from Changzhou, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 194-203.
    2. Sipei Pan & Jiale Liang & Wanxu Chen & Jiangfeng Li & Ziqi Liu, 2021. "Gray Forecast of Ecosystem Services Value and Its Driving Forces in Karst Areas of China: A Case Study in Guizhou Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Brad H McRae & Sonia A Hall & Paul Beier & David M Theobald, 2012. "Where to Restore Ecological Connectivity? Detecting Barriers and Quantifying Restoration Benefits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Ziyi Liu & Xiaoyu Gan & Weining Dai & Ying Huang, 2022. "Construction of an Ecological Security Pattern and the Evaluation of Corridor Priority Based on ESV and the “Importance–Connectivity” Index: A Case Study of Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Haixia Zhao & Xiaowei Jiang & Binjie Gu & Kaiyong Wang, 2022. "Evaluation and Functional Zoning of the Ecological Environment in Urban Space—A Case Study of Taizhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Ziyang Wang & Peiji Shi & Xuebin Zhang & Huali Tong & Weiping Zhang & Yue Liu, 2021. "Research on Landscape Pattern Construction and Ecological Restoration of Jiuquan City Based on Ecological Security Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Jingjie Zhang & Feng Jiang & Zhenyuan Cai & Yunchuan Dai & Daoxin Liu & Pengfei Song & Yuansheng Hou & Hongmei Gao & Tongzuo Zhang, 2021. "Resistance-Based Connectivity Model to Construct Corridors of the Przewalski’s Gazelle ( Procapra Przewalskii ) in Fragmented Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Venelin Todorov & Ivan Dimov, 2022. "Innovative Digital Stochastic Methods for Multidimensional Sensitivity Analysis in Air Pollution Modelling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, June.
    9. Yanjie Zhang & Wei Song & Shun Fu & Dazhi Yang, 2020. "Decoupling of Land Use Intensity and Ecological Environment in Gansu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    10. David E. Bloom & David Canning & Günther Fink, 2008. "Urbanization and the Wealth of Nations," PGDA Working Papers 3008, Program on the Global Demography of Aging.
    11. Qian Tang & Jiping Li & Tao Tang & Pengcheng Liao & Danmei Wang, 2022. "Construction of a Forest Ecological Network Based on the Forest Ecological Suitability Index and the Morphological Spatial Pattern Method: A Case Study of Jindong Forest Farm in Hunan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    12. De Montis, Andrea & Ganciu, Amedeo & Cabras, Matteo & Bardi, Antonietta & Peddio, Valentina & Caschili, Simone & Massa, Pierangelo & Cocco, Chiara & Mulas, Maurizio, 2019. "Resilient ecological networks: A comparative approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Changes in Ecosystem Services Value and Its Driving Factors in the Karst Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caihong Yang & Huijun Guo & Xiaoyuan Huang & Yanxia Wang & Xiaona Li & Xinyuan Cui, 2022. "Ecological Network Construction of a National Park Based on MSPA and MCR Models: An Example of the Proposed National Parks of “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shunqian Gao & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of the Effects of Human Activities on Habitat Quality: A Case Study of Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Shunqian Gao & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Changes in and Patterns of the Tradeoffs and Synergies of Production-Living-Ecological Space: A Case Study of Longli County, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Zhenfeng Wang & Yan Liu & Xiangqun Xie & Xinke Wang & Hong Lin & Huili Xie & Xingzhao Liu, 2022. "Identifying Key Areas of Green Space for Ecological Restoration Based on Ecological Security Patterns in Fujian Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Ziyi Liu & Xiaoyu Gan & Weining Dai & Ying Huang, 2022. "Construction of an Ecological Security Pattern and the Evaluation of Corridor Priority Based on ESV and the “Importance–Connectivity” Index: A Case Study of Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Xiangshou Dong & Quanzhi Yuan & Yaowen Kou & Shujun Li & Ping Ren, 2023. "Distribution and Ecological Network Construction of National Natural Protected Areas in the Upper Reaches of Yangtze River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Di Zhou & Wei Song, 2021. "Identifying Ecological Corridors and Networks in Mountainous Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Chunguang Hu & Zhiyong Wang & Gaoliu Huang & Yichen Ding, 2022. "Construction, Evaluation, and Optimization of a Regional Ecological Security Pattern Based on MSPA–Circuit Theory Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Gaodi Xie & Wenhui Chen & Shuyan Cao & Chunxia Lu & Yu Xiao & Changshun Zhang & Na Li & Shuo Wang, 2014. "The Outward Extension of an Ecological Footprint in City Expansion: The Case of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Benjamin Spears Ngmekpele, Cheabu & James Hawkins, Ephraim, 2014. "Consumers’ Perception of Quality and Health Beliefs of Sachet Drinking Water: Evidence from Obuasi in the Ashanti Region of Ghana," International Journal of Social Science Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(2), pages 200-217, September.
    10. Joachim Vandercasteelen & Seneshaw Tamru & Bart Minten & Johan Swinnen, 2017. "Secondary towns, agricultural prices, and intensification: Evidence from Ethiopia," LICOS Discussion Papers 39317, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    11. Roberto Ganau & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2022. "Does urban concentration matter for changes in country economic performance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1275-1299, May.
    12. Zhen Yang & Jun Lei & Jian-Gang Li, 2019. "Identifying the Determinants of Urbanization in Prefecture-Level Cities in China: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Spatial Production Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Chen, Mingxing & Liu, Weidong & Lu, Dadao, 2016. "Challenges and the way forward in China’s new-type urbanization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 334-339.
    14. Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández & Manuel Escobar-Farfán, 2022. "Zero-Waste Management and Sustainable Consumption: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Laura E Farrell & Daniel M Levy & Therese Donovan & Ruth Mickey & Alan Howard & Jennifer Vashon & Mark Freeman & Kim Royar & C William Kilpatrick, 2018. "Landscape connectivity for bobcat (Lynx rufus) and lynx (Lynx canadensis) in the Northeastern United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, March.
    16. Robert F. Baldwin & Nakisha T. Fouch, 2018. "Understanding the Biodiversity Contributions of Small Protected Areas Presents Many Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-12, October.
    17. Sandip Sarker & Arifuzzaman Khan & Mehdad Mamur Mannan, 2016. "Urban population and economic growth: South Asia perspective," European Journal of Government and Economics, Europa Grande, vol. 5(1), pages 64-75, June.
    18. Zhenzhen Yuan & Weijie Li & Yong Wang & Dayun Zhu & Qiuhong Wang & Yan Liu & Lingyan Zhou, 2022. "Ecosystem Health Evaluation and Ecological Security Patterns Construction Based on VORSD and Circuit Theory: A Case Study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    19. David E. Bloom, 2011. "Population Dynamics in India and Implications for Economic Growth," PGDA Working Papers 6511, Program on the Global Demography of Aging.
    20. Ying Chen & Qi Da & Weizhang Liang & Peng Xiao & Bing Dai & Guoyan Zhao, 2022. "Bagged Ensemble of Gaussian Process Classifiers for Assessing Rockburst Damage Potential with an Imbalanced Dataset," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9136-:d:871768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.