IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5306-d555925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insights into the Predictors of Attitude toward Entomophagy: The Potential Role of Health Literacy: A Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in a Sample of Students of the University of Florence

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Lorini

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, v.le Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy)

  • Laura Ricotta

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, v.le Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy)

  • Virginia Vettori

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, v.le Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy)

  • Marco Del Riccio

    (School of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, v.le Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy)

  • Massimiliano Alberto Biamonte

    (School of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, v.le Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy)

  • Guglielmo Bonaccorsi

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, v.le Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy)

Abstract

In Western countries, one of the main barriers to entomophagy is repulsion toward insects. Few studies have investigated the factors that influence attitudes toward entomophagy. Therefore, we conducted a cross-sectional study involving a sample of 248 university students, focusing on disgust and other potential attributes that can influence insect consumption, including health literacy. We used a 17-item self-administered questionnaire. Consistent with the literature, two items were chosen as outcome variables to evaluate the predictors of the propensity to consume insects: “Have you ever eaten insects or insect-based products?” and “How disgusting do you find eating insects?” The data analysis shows that having already eaten insects is inversely associated with the level of disgust (OR: 0.1, p < 0.01); and it is positively associated with higher levels of health literacy (OR: 3.66, p > 0.01). Additionally, having some knowledge and information about entomophagy is inversely associated with a higher level of disgust (OR: 0.44, p = 0.03 and OR: 0.25, p = 0.03, respectively), while being female is positively associated with disgust (OR: 3.26, p < 0.01). Our results suggest the potential role of health literacy, in addition to other factors, in influencing the willingness to taste insects. However, further studies involving larger and non-convenience samples are needed to confirm our hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Lorini & Laura Ricotta & Virginia Vettori & Marco Del Riccio & Massimiliano Alberto Biamonte & Guglielmo Bonaccorsi, 2021. "Insights into the Predictors of Attitude toward Entomophagy: The Potential Role of Health Literacy: A Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in a Sample of Students of the University of Florence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5306-:d:555925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5306/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5306/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menozzi, Davide & Mora, Cristina & Sogari, Giovanni, 2019. "Edible Insects in the Food Sector: Methods, Current Applications and Perspective," 2019 Eighth AIEAA Conference, June 13-14, Pistoia, Italy 300915, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    2. Virginia Vettori & Chiara Lorini & Chiara Milani & Guglielmo Bonaccorsi, 2019. "Towards the Implementation of a Conceptual Framework of Food and Nutrition Literacy: Providing Healthy Eating for the Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Bublitz, Melissa G. & Peracchio, Laura A. & Andreasen, Alan R. & Kees, Jeremy & Kidwell, Blair & Miller, Elizabeth Gelfand & Motley, Carol M. & Peter, Paula C. & Rajagopal, Priyali & Scott, Maura L. &, 2013. "Promoting positive change: Advancing the food well-being paradigm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1211-1218.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie-Eve Laporte & Géraldine Michel & Sophie Rieunier, 2017. "Towards a better understanding of eating behaviour through the concept of Perception of Nutritional Risk," Post-Print halshs-02923251, HAL.
    2. Dangchen Sui & Jiaxin He & Ke Liu & Xinyan Lv, 2024. "Investigating the Impact of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Food Literacy on Green Food Purchasing Intentions Among Chinese Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Generation Y," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Katherine Consavage Stanley & Paige B. Harrigan & Elena L. Serrano & Vivica I. Kraak, 2021. "Applying a Multi-Dimensional Digital Food and Nutrition Literacy Model to Inform Research and Policies to Enable Adults in the U.S. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to Make Healthy Purchases ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Camille Cornudet & Marie‐eve Laporte & Fabienne Berger-Remy & Béatrice Parguel & Jean‐loup Richet, 2025. "When Food Scanner Apps Outperform Front‐of‐Pack Nutrition Labels," Post-Print hal-05013772, HAL.
    5. Bublitz, Melissa G. & Peracchio, Laura A., 2015. "Applying industry practices to promote healthy foods: An exploration of positive marketing outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2484-2493.
    6. Rodrigo Elías Zambrano & Gloria Jiménez-Marín & Araceli Galiano-Coronil & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2021. "Children, Media and Food. A New Paradigm in Food Advertising, Social Marketing and Happiness Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Gao, Yixing (Lisa) & Mattila, Anna S., 2017. "The impact of stereotyping on consumers' food choices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 80-85.
    8. Ourahmoune, Nacima, 2017. "Embodied transformations and food restrictions: The case of medicalized obesity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 192-201.
    9. Zhou, Li & Zhu, Guowei, 2022. "Mind the gap: How the numerical precision of exercise-data-based food labels can nudge healthier food choices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 354-367.
    10. Dahl, Andrew J. & Milne, George R. & Peltier, James W., 2021. "Digital health information seeking in an omni-channel environment: A shared decision-making and service-dominant logic perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 840-850.
    11. Carmela Annarumma & Rocco Palumbo & Ersilia Troiano & Stefania Vezzosi, 2017. "Una misurazione "euristica" dell?alfabetizzazione alimentare: alcuni spunti esplorativi," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(102), pages 61-83.
    12. Dorit Zimand-Sheiner & Ofrit Kol & Shalom Levy, 2024. "Help me if you can: the advantage of farmers’ altruistic message appeal in generating engagement with social media posts during COVID-19," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2405-2426, December.
    13. Phillips, Megan & Kapitan, Sommer & Rush, Elaine, 2024. "From the store to the kitchen: Herbal scents drive wholesome food choice," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Sebastian Isbanner & Julia Carins & Sharyn Rundle-Thiele, 2022. "Healthy Eats—Evaluation of a Social Marketing Program Delivered in Primary School Settings in Queensland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Raquel P. F. Guiné & Sofia G. Florença & Ofélia Anjos & Paula M. R. Correia & Bruno M. Ferreira & Cristina A. Costa, 2021. "An Insight into the Level of Information about Sustainability of Edible Insects in a Traditionally Non-Insect-Eating Country: Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Berg, Nathan & Preston, Kate L., 2017. "Willingness to pay for local food?: Consumer preferences and shopping behavior at Otago Farmers Market," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 343-361.
    17. Sarah McManus & Donna Pendergast & Harry Kanasa, 2025. "The Intersection Between Food Literacy and Sustainability: A Systematic Quantitative Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-32, January.
    18. Bui, My (Myla) & Tangari, Andrea Heintz & Haws, Kelly L., 2017. "Can health “halos” extend to food packaging? An investigation into food healthfulness perceptions and serving sizes on consumption decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 221-228.
    19. Gwozdz, W. & Reisch, L. & Eiben, G. & Hunsberger, M. & Konstabel, K. & Kovacs, E. & Luszczki, E. & Mazur, A. & Mendl, E. & Saamel, M. & Wolters, M., 2020. "The effect of smileys as motivational incentives on children’s fruit and vegetable choice, consumption and waste: A field experiment in schools in five European countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Ilona Liliána Birtalan & Attila Bartha & Ágnes Neulinger & György Bárdos & Attila Oláh & József Rácz & Adrien Rigó, 2020. "Community Supported Agriculture as a Driver of Food-Related Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5306-:d:555925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.