IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10467-d1532588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Impact of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Food Literacy on Green Food Purchasing Intentions Among Chinese Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Generation Y

Author

Listed:
  • Dangchen Sui

    (International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiaxin He

    (International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ke Liu

    (International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China)

  • Xinyan Lv

    (International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China)

Abstract

In the context of escalating environmental concerns and the imperative for sustainable consumption, this study meticulously examines the variations in food literacy and the propensity to purchase green food among Chinese consumers across three generational cohorts: baby boomers, generation X, and generation Y. Utilizing the theory of planned behavior (TPB) as a conceptual framework, and employing SPSS and structural equation modeling (SEM) for rigorous data analysis, the research elucidates the influence of generational attributes on green food consumption patterns. The study’s importance is marked by its unique contributions: it identifies intergenerational discrepancies in food literacy and furnishes empirical support for the enhancement of green food literacy across all consumer demographics. Furthermore, the research constructs an innovative model of food literacy that integrates generational traits, establishing a theoretical scaffold for advancing consumers’ green food literacy. This comprehensive model synthesizes the determinants of generational variations, food literacy, and the intention to consume green food. Findings from a demographically stratified sample of 720 participants, with equal representation from each cohort and gender (240 participants per cohort), highlight the distinct profiles in food literacy and green food purchasing intentions. These findings are instrumental for stakeholders in formulating nuanced strategies that promote sustainable consumption practices, tailored to the specific characteristics of each generational group within the Chinese market.

Suggested Citation

  • Dangchen Sui & Jiaxin He & Ke Liu & Xinyan Lv, 2024. "Investigating the Impact of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Food Literacy on Green Food Purchasing Intentions Among Chinese Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Generation Y," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10467-:d:1532588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhongwei Zhao & Guangyu Zhang, 2018. "Socioeconomic Factors Have Been the Major Driving Force of China’s Fertility Changes Since the Mid-1990s," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(2), pages 733-742, April.
    2. Neslihan Öner & Hasan Durmuş & Yağmur Yaşar Fırat & Arda Borlu & Nilüfer Özkan, 2024. "Sustainable and Healthy Eating Behaviors and Environmental Literacy of Generations X, Y and Z with the Same Ancestral Background: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Nanna Meyer & Mary Ann Kluge & Sean Svette & Alyssa Shrader & Andrea Vanderwoude & Bethany Frieler, 2021. "Food Next Door: From Food Literacy to Citizenship on a College Campus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Roh, Taewoo & Seok, Junhee & Kim, Yaeri, 2022. "Unveiling ways to reach organic purchase: Green perceived value, perceived knowledge, attitude, subjective norm, and trust," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Virginia Vettori & Chiara Lorini & Chiara Milani & Guglielmo Bonaccorsi, 2019. "Towards the Implementation of a Conceptual Framework of Food and Nutrition Literacy: Providing Healthy Eating for the Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Sorina Madalina Boariu & Ana Maria Scutariu & Delia Reurean Pintilei & Monica Tarcea & Raquel P. F. Guiné & Manuela Ferreira, 2024. "Food Literacy Assessment of a Sample of Romanian Higher Education Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Igor Popovic & Bart A. G. Bossink & Peter C. van der Sijde, 2019. "Factors Influencing Consumers’ Decision to Purchase Food in Environmentally Friendly Packaging: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go from Here?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Deepak Bhattasali & Masahiro Kawai, 2002. "Implications of China’s Accession to the World Trade Organization," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Hanns Günther Hilpert & René Haak (ed.), Japan and China, chapter 4, pages 72-102, Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Rebekka DePew & Gilbert Gonzales, 2020. "Differences in Health Outcomes Between Millennials and Generation X in the USA: Evidence from the National Health Interview Survey," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(3), pages 605-616, June.
    10. Ben Y. F. Fong & Wang-Kin Chiu & Wendy F. M. Chan & Ting Yu Lam, 2021. "A Review Study of a Green Diet and Healthy Ageing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Marija Ham & Marina Jeger & Anita Frajman Ivković, 2015. "The role of subjective norms in forming the intention to purchase green food," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 738-748, January.
    12. Smith, Samantha & Paladino, Angela, 2010. "Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 93-104.
    13. Hande Mortaş & Semra Navruz-Varlı & Merve Esra Çıtar-Dazıroğlu & Saniye Bilici, 2023. "Can Unveiling the Relationship between Nutritional Literacy and Sustainable Eating Behaviors Survive Our Future?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Belén Prados‐Peña & Francisco Jesús Gálvez‐Sánchez & Ana García‐López, 2023. "Moving toward sustainable development: Social, economic and environmental value as antecedents of purchase intention in the sustainable crafts sector," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 3024-3037, August.
    2. Yamna Erraach & Fatma Jaafer & Ivana Radić & Mechthild Donner, 2021. "Sustainability Labels on Olive Oil: A Review on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Sarah McManus & Donna Pendergast & Harry Kanasa, 2025. "The Intersection Between Food Literacy and Sustainability: A Systematic Quantitative Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-32, January.
    4. Silvia Lisciani & Emanuela Camilli & Stefania Marconi, 2024. "Enhancing Food and Nutrition Literacy: A Key Strategy for Reducing Food Waste and Improving Diet Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Raja Kifaya & Daniele Rama, 2023. "Determinants of organic tunisian purchasing behaviour: an application of the consumption values theory," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2023(2), pages 161-177, June.
    6. Kavita Kamboj & Nawal Kishor, 2024. "Assessing the Effects of Customer-perceived Values Toward Organic Food: The Moderating Role of Media Exposure to Food Safety Issues," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 12(3), pages 444-461, July.
    7. Cheng, Junjun & Chen, Bo & Huang, Zihang, 2023. "Collective-based ad transparency in targeted hotel advertising: Consumers’ regulatory focus underlying the crowd safety effect," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    9. Peng, Yue & Wang, Wei & Zhen, Shangsong & Liu, Yunqiang, 2024. "Does digitalization help green consumption? Empirical test based on the perspective of supply and demand of green products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Shuang Chen, 2020. "Parental Investment After the Birth of a Sibling: The Effect of Family Size in Low-Fertility China," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(6), pages 2085-2111, December.
    11. Carmella Andrea L. Cabrera & Ardvin Kester S. Ong & John Francis T. Diaz & Maela Madel L. Cahigas & Ma. Janice J. Gumasing, 2025. "Plastic to apparel: an analysis of sustainable purchasing intention using a machine learning ensemble," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Eva M. Murgado-Armenteros & María Gutierrez-Salcedo & Francisco José Torres-Ruiz, 2020. "The Concern about Biodiversity as a Criterion for the Classification of the Sustainable Consumer: A Cross-Cultural Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Soni, Sigma & Arora, Parvinder & Kasilingam, Dharun & Jain, Varsha, 2025. "Digital daydreams: Exploring consumer motivations for engaging with the metaverse," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    14. Castaldo, Sandro & Ciacci, Andrea & Penco, Lara & Profumo, Giorgia, 2024. "Which trust layer better counterbalances the risk impact on travel intentions in a crisis scenario?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Cherry C. I. Lau & Christina W. Y. Wong, 2024. "Achieving sustainable development with sustainable packaging: A natural‐resource‐based view perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4766-4787, July.
    16. Švecová Jana & Odehnalová Pavla, 2019. "The determinants of consumer behaviour of students from Brno when purchasing organic food," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 49-64, March.
    17. Anh Thi Nguyen & Alrence S. Halibas & Robert McClelland & Nguyen Hoang Thuan, 2024. "Configurational analysis of conditions influencing customers’ channel switching intention in omnichannel retailing: a fuzzy-set analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 141-178, February.
    18. Xinxiang Li & Yarong Huang & Kwangsoo Cho, 2025. "A Study on the Role of Tourists’ Multidimensional Perceptions in Regenerative Composite Cultural Spaces and Their Influence on Travel Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-24, September.
    19. Katherine Consavage Stanley & Paige B. Harrigan & Elena L. Serrano & Vivica I. Kraak, 2021. "Applying a Multi-Dimensional Digital Food and Nutrition Literacy Model to Inform Research and Policies to Enable Adults in the U.S. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to Make Healthy Purchases ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-25, August.
    20. Yanghee Kim & Leishuo Wang & Jinho Noh & Taewoo Roh, 2025. "Exploring the role of innovation diffusion and trust transfer on technology acceptance: intention to use drone delivery service in China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 357-384, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10467-:d:1532588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.