IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i7p2319-d338767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Two-Stage MCDM Model for Exploring the Influential Relationships of Sustainable Sports Tourism Criteria in Taichung City

Author

Listed:
  • Jen-Jen Yang

    (Office of Physical Education General Education Center, Chaoyang University of Technology, 168, Jifeng E. Rd., Wufeng District, Taichung 413310, Taiwan)

  • Yen-Ching Chuang

    (Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, College of Public Affairs, National Taipei University, 151, University Rd., Sanxia District, New Taipei City 23741, Taiwan)

  • Huai-Wei Lo

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, 1, Sec. 3, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Ting-I Lee

    (Office of Physical Education General Education Center, Chaoyang University of Technology, 168, Jifeng E. Rd., Wufeng District, Taichung 413310, Taiwan)

Abstract

Many countries advocate sports for all to cultivate people’s interest in sports. In cities, cross-industry alliances between sports and tourism are one of the common practices. The following two important issues need to be discussed, namely, what factors should be paid attention to in the development of sports tourism, and what are the mutual influential relationships among these factors. This study proposes a novel two-stage multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to incorporate the concept of sustainable development into sports tourism. First, the Bayesian best–worst method (Bayesian BWM) is used to screen out important criteria. Bayesian BWM solves the problem of expert opinion integration of conventional BWM. It is based on the statistical probability to estimate the optimal group criteria weights. Secondly, the rough decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (rough DEMATEL) technique is used to map out complex influential relationships. The introduction of DEMATEL from the rough set theory has better practicality. In the calculation program, interval types are used to replace crisp values in order to retain more expert information. A city in central Taiwan was used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the model. The results show that the quality of urban security, government marketing, business sponsorship and mass transit planning are the most important criteria. In addition, in conjunction with local festivals is the most influential factor for the overall evaluation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Jen-Jen Yang & Yen-Ching Chuang & Huai-Wei Lo & Ting-I Lee, 2020. "A Two-Stage MCDM Model for Exploring the Influential Relationships of Sustainable Sports Tourism Criteria in Taichung City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2319-:d:338767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2319/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2319/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Granero-Gallegos & Pedro Jesús Ruiz-Montero & Antonio Baena-Extremera & Marina Martínez-Molina, 2019. "Effects of Motivation, Basic Psychological Needs, and Teaching Competence on Disruptive Behaviours in Secondary School Physical Education Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Antonio Granero-Gallegos & Manuel Gómez-López & Juan González-Hernández & Antonio Baena-Extremera & María del Mar Ortiz-Camacho, 2018. "Spanish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Sport Motivation Scale-II with High School Physical Education Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Heather J. Gibson & Kyriaki Kaplanidou & Sung Jin Kang, 2012. "Small-scale event sport tourism: A case study in sustainable tourism," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 160-170, April.
    4. Ewa Kruszyńska & Joanna Poczta, 2020. "Difficulties Limiting Access to Sports and Recreational Facilities in the City in the Perceptions of Service Users. Sports and Recreational Infrastructure Management Policy—Poznan Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Guang-Bin Qu & Tian-Yu Zhao & Bo-Wei Zhu & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Shan-Lin Huang, 2019. "Use of a Modified DANP-mV Model to Improve Quality of Life in Rural Residents: The Empirical Case of Xingshisi Village, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Tai-Wu Chang & Huai-Wei Lo & Kai-Ying Chen & James J. H. Liou, 2019. "A Novel FMEA Model Based on Rough BWM and Rough TOPSIS-AL for Risk Assessment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Mu-Hsin Chang & James J. H. Liou & Huai-Wei Lo, 2019. "A Hybrid MCDM Model for Evaluating Strategic Alliance Partners in the Green Biopharmaceutical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Gibson, Heather J. & Kaplanidou, Kyriaki & Kang, Sung Jin, 2012. "Small-scale event sport tourism: A case study in sustainable tourism," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 160-170.
    9. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    10. Kim, Wonyoung & Jun, Ho Mun & Walker, Matthew & Drane, Dan, 2015. "Evaluating the perceived social impacts of hosting large-scale sport tourism events: Scale development and validation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Zahirul Khaiyum & Sudipa Sarker & Golam Kabir, 2023. "Evaluation of Carbon Emission Factors in the Cement Industry: An Emerging Economy Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Fei-Hsin Huang & Hann Nguyen, 2022. "Selecting Optimal Cultural Tourism for Indigenous Tribes by Fuzzy MCDM," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Moisés Barbosa Junior & Eliane Pinheiro & Carla Cristiane Sokulski & Diego Alexis Ramos Huarachi & Antonio Carlos de Francisco, 2022. "How to Identify Barriers to the Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture? A Study Based on a Multi-Criteria Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Salvador Garcia-Ayllon & Eloy Hontoria & Nolberto Munier, 2021. "The Contribution of MCDM to SUMP: The Case of Spanish Cities during 2006–2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Göçmen Polat, Elifcan & Yücesan, Melih & Gül, Muhammet, 2023. "A comparative framework for criticality assessment of strategic raw materials in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Tavana, Madjid & Mina, Hassan & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J., 2023. "A general Best-Worst method considering interdependency with application to innovation and technology assessment at NASA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Antonio Granero-Gallegos, 2020. "New Developments in Physical Education and Sport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-9, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marko Perić & Vanja Vitezić, 2019. "Socio-Economic Impacts of Event Failure: The Case of a Cancelled International Cycling Race," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Huei-Fu Lu, 2021. "Hallmark Sporting Events as a Vehicle for Promoting the Sustainable Development of Regional Tourism: Strategic Perspectives from Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Juan Antonio Sánchez-Sáez & Francisco Segado Segado & Ferran Calabuig-Moreno & Ana Mª Gallardo Guerrero, 2020. "Measuring Residents’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility at Small- and Medium-Sized Sports Events," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko & Joanna Poczta, 2018. "A Small-Scale Event and a Big Impact—Is This Relationship Possible in the World of Sport? The Meaning of Heritage Sporting Events for Sustainable Development of Tourism—Experiences from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Hui Wang & Peng Ju & Honggang Xu & Donna Wong, 2019. "Are Grassroots Sports Events Good for Migrant Cities’ Sustainable Development? A Case Study of the Shenzhen 100 km Hikathon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Inoue, Yuhei & Heffernan, Caroline & Yamaguchi, Taku & Filo, Kevin, 2018. "Social and charitable impacts of a charity-affiliated sport event: A mixed methods study," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 202-218.
    7. Jen-Jen Yang & Huai-Wei Lo & Chen-Shen Chao & Chih-Chien Shen & Chin-Cheng Yang, 2020. "Establishing a Sustainable Sports Tourism Evaluation Framework with a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Explore Potential Sports Tourism Attractions in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Marko Perić, 2018. "Estimating the Perceived Socio-Economic Impacts of Hosting Large-Scale Sport Tourism Events," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Joanna Poczta & Agata Dąbrowska & Marek Kazimierczak & François Gravelle & Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko, 2020. "Overtourism and Medium Scale Sporting Events Organisations—the Perception of Negative Externalities by Host Residents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Valentin Herbold & Hannes Thees & Julian Philipp, 2020. "The Host Community and Its Role in Sports Tourism—Exploring an Emerging Research Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Maria Morfoulaki & Glykeria Myrovali & Kornilia-Maria Kotoula & Thomas Karagiorgos & Kostas Alexandris, 2023. "Sport Tourism as Driving Force for Destinations’ Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Ine Hugaerts & Jeroen Scheerder & Kobe Helsen & Joris Corthouts & Erik Thibaut & Thomas Könecke, 2021. "Sustainability in Participatory Sports Events: The Development of a Research Instrument and Empirical Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Martin Thomas Falk & Markku Vieru, 2021. "Short-term hotel room price effects of sporting events," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(3), pages 569-588, May.
    14. Vargane Csoban, Katalin & Serra, Gyorgy, 2014. "The role of small-scale sports events in developing sustainable sport tourism – a case study of fencing," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 8(4), pages 1-6, December.
    15. Krongthong Heebkhoksung & Wanchai Rattanawong & Varin Vongmanee, 2023. "A New Paradigm of a Sustainability-Balanced Scorecard Model for Sport Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Bergier, Jozef & Wasilewska, Malgorzata & Bergier, Michal, 2018. "European Championship In Football In Poland And The Increase In Foreign Tourist Arrivals," UTMS Journal of Economics, University of Tourism and Management, Skopje, Macedonia, vol. 9(1), pages 103-108.
    17. Mohamed Toukabri & Maher Toukabri, 2023. "Football Industry Accounting as a Social and Organizational Practice: from the Implementation of the CSR Process to Integrated Reporting," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 725-753, October.
    18. Balázs Polcsik & Tamás Laczkó & Szilvia Perényi, 2022. "Euro 2020 Held during the COVID-19 Period: Budapest Residents’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Zhou, Ran & Kaplanidou, Kyriaki, 2018. "Building social capital from sport event participation: An exploration of the social impacts of participatory sport events on the community," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 491-503.
    20. Jesyca Salgado-Barandela & à ngel Barajas & Patricio Sánchez-Fernández, 2021. "Sport-event portfolios: An analysis of their ability to attract revenue from tourism," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(3), pages 436-454, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2319-:d:338767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.