IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i15p5590-d393825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Performance Management System in Healthcare for All Seasons?

Author

Listed:
  • Milena Vainieri

    (Management and Health laboratory, Institute of Management, Department Embeds, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Guido Noto

    (Department of Economics, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy)

  • Francesca Ferre

    (Management and Health laboratory, Institute of Management, Department Embeds, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Laura C. Rosella

    (Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada)

Abstract

Health systems face challenges which are inherent to care demand and supply evolution (i.e., demographic change, new technologies) or are the results of unexpected occurrence originating outside the health system, such as economic shocks or epidemic outbreaks. Both challenges often require a paradigm shift in governance and organization, financing and resource allocation, accountability frameworks, as well as public health system responses. Based on key reviews and seminal papers of performance management, public health, sustainability and resilience, the article presents three emerging challenges for performance management systems in healthcare: i) the inclusion of the population approach; ii) the measurement and consideration of the multi-facets concepts of value; iii) the importance of resilience and sustainability. Performance management systems need to evolve to cope with this changing scenario. The article sheds light on uncovered areas by performance management, and it proposes a research agenda for scholars of both performance management and health service research.

Suggested Citation

  • Milena Vainieri & Guido Noto & Francesca Ferre & Laura C. Rosella, 2020. "A Performance Management System in Healthcare for All Seasons?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-10, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5590-:d:393825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5590/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5590/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mery, Gustavo & Majumder, Shilpi & Brown, Adalsteinn & Dobrow, Mark J., 2017. "What do we mean when we talk about the Triple Aim? A systematic review of evolving definitions and adaptations of the framework at the health system level," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(6), pages 629-636.
    2. Nancy Devlin;John Appleby, 2010. "Getting the Most out of PROMs: Putting Health Outcomes at the Heart of NHS Decision-Making," Monograph 000220, Office of Health Economics.
    3. Kindig, D.A. & Stoddart, G., 2003. "What is population health?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(3), pages 380-383.
    4. Wadmann, Sarah & Johansen, Sarah & Lind, Ane & Okkels Birk, Hans & Hoeyer, Klaus, 2013. "Analytical perspectives on performance-based management: an outline of theoretical assumptions in the existing literature," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(4), pages 511-527, October.
    5. Marmor, Theodore & Wendt, Claus, 2012. "Conceptual frameworks for comparing healthcare politics and policy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 11-20.
    6. Schwartz, Robert & Deber, Raisa, 2016. "The performance measurement–management divide in public health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 273-280.
    7. Hood, Christopher, 1995. "The "new public management" in the 1980s: Variations on a theme," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(2-3), pages 93-109.
    8. David Nuttall & David Parkin & Nancy Devlin, 2015. "Inter‐Provider Comparison Of Patient‐Reported Outcomes: Developing An Adjustment To Account For Differences In Patient Case Mix," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 41-54, January.
    9. Guido Noto & Ilaria Corazza & Kristīne Kļaviņa & Jana Lepiksone & Sabina Nuti, 2019. "Health system performance assessment in small countries: The case study of Latvia," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1408-1422, October.
    10. Edward Kelley & Jeremy Hurst, 2006. "Health Care Quality Indicators Project: Conceptual Framework Paper," OECD Health Working Papers 23, OECD Publishing.
    11. Noto, Guido & Belardi, Paolo & Vainieri, Milena, 2020. "Unintended consequences of expenditure targets on resource allocation in health systems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(4), pages 462-469.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guido Noto & Lucrezia Coletta & Sara Zuccarino & Milena Vainieri, 2021. "Il controllo e la gestione della performance delle attivit? di prevenzione in contesti interorganizzativi: il caso dei controlli frontalieri sugli alimenti," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(117), pages 59-75.
    2. Luca Papi & Riccardo Ievoli & Giorgia Gobbo & Enrico Deidda Gagliardo & Lamberto Manzoli, 2021. "Performance governance per la generazione di Valore Pubblico in sanit?. Evidenze empiriche dalle aziende sanitarie dell?Emilia-Romagna," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(117), pages 27-58.
    3. Sabina Nuti & Guido Noto & Tommaso Grillo Ruggieri & Milena Vainieri, 2021. "The Challenges of Hospitals’ Planning & Control Systems: The Path toward Public Value Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Chiara Barchielli & Anne Marie Rafferty & Milena Vainieri, 2022. "Integrating Key Nursing Measures into a Comprehensive Healthcare Performance Management System: A Tuscan Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Marta Marsilio & Floriana Fusco & Eleonora Gheduzzi & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2021. "Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Paolo Belardi & Ilaria Corazza & Manila Bonciani & Fabio Manenti & Milena Vainieri, 2022. "Evaluating Healthcare Performance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Pilot Study on Selected Settings in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M Obucina & N Harris & JA Fitzgerald & A Chai & K Radford & A Ross & L Carr & N Vecchio, 2018. "The Triple Aim framework in the context of primary healthcare: A systematic literature review," Discussion Papers in Economics economics:201804, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    2. Matthias Fischer & Harald Heinrichs, 2018. "Dimensions, Dialectic, Discourse. Three Political Perspectives on the Sustainability of the German Healthcare System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Obucina, M. & Harris, N. & Fitzgerald, J.A. & Chai, A. & Radford, K. & Ross, A. & Carr, L. & Vecchio, N., 2018. "The application of triple aim framework in the context of primary healthcare: A systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(8), pages 900-907.
    4. Guido Noto & Ilaria Corazza & Kristīne Kļaviņa & Jana Lepiksone & Sabina Nuti, 2019. "Health system performance assessment in small countries: The case study of Latvia," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1408-1422, October.
    5. Noto, Guido & Belardi, Paolo & Vainieri, Milena, 2020. "Unintended consequences of expenditure targets on resource allocation in health systems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(4), pages 462-469.
    6. Ian Hodge & William M. Adams, 2016. "Short-Term Projects versus Adaptive Governance: Conflicting Demands in the Management of Ecological Restoration," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Ball, Amanda & Craig, Russell, 2010. "Using neo-institutionalism to advance social and environmental accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 283-293.
    8. Karen Minyard & Tina A. Smith & Richard Turner & Bobby Milstein & Lori Solomon, 2018. "Community and programmatic factors influencing effective use of system dynamic models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 154-171, January.
    9. Robbins, Geraldine & Lapsley, Irvine, 2015. "From secrecy to transparency: Accounting and the transition from religious charity to publicly-owned hospital," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 19-32.
    10. Rosta, Miklós, 2013. "New Public Management: opportunity for the Centre, thread for the Periphery," MPRA Paper 68474, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    12. Maria Rosaria Alfano & Anna Laura Baraldi & Claudia Cantabene, 2023. "Eppur si muove: an evaluation of museum policy reform in Italy," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 47(1), pages 97-131, March.
    13. Kirstie L. Haywood & Roger Wilson & Sophie Staniszewska & Sam Salek, 2016. "Using PROMs in Healthcare: Who Should Be in the Driving Seat—Policy Makers, Health Professionals, Methodologists or Patients?," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 9(6), pages 495-498, December.
    14. Melissa D. Olfert & Rebecca L. Hagedorn & Makenzie L. Barr & Oluremi A. Famodu & Jessica M. Rubino & Jade A. White, 2018. "eB4CAST: An Evidence-Based Tool to Promote Dissemination and Implementation in Community-Based, Public Health Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Sari Suomalainen & Outi Tahvonen & Helena Kahiluoto, 2022. "From Participation to Involvement in Urban Open Space Management and Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Shukla, Anuprita & Teedon, Paul & Cornish, Flora, 2016. "Empty rituals? A qualitative study of users’ experience of monitoring & evaluation systems in HIV interventions in western India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 7-15.
    17. Mr. Richard I Allen & Yasemin Hurcan & Peter Murphy & Mr. Maximilien Queyranne & Mr. Sami Yläoutinen, 2015. "The Evolving Functions and Organization of Finance Ministries," IMF Working Papers 2015/232, International Monetary Fund.
    18. Ben Cave & Ryngan Pyper & Birgitte Fischer-Bonde & Sarah Humboldt-Dachroeden & Piedad Martin-Olmedo, 2021. "Lessons from an International Initiative to Set and Share Good Practice on Human Health in Environmental Impact Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-23, February.
    19. repec:cuf:journl:y:2017:v:18:i:1:moreno-enguix is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Michela Luciana Luisa Zini & Giuseppe Banfi, 2021. "A Narrative Literature Review of Bias in Collecting Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-12, November.
    21. Schwartz, Robert & Deber, Raisa, 2016. "The performance measurement–management divide in public health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 273-280.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5590-:d:393825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.