IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i2p277-d199061.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Objectively Measured and Self-Reported Sedentary Behaviours and Social Connectedness among Adolescents

Author

Listed:
  • Lauren Arundell

    (Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

  • Jo Salmon

    (Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

  • Jenny Veitch

    (Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

  • Anna Timperio

    (Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

Abstract

Adolescents spend significant amounts of time engaged in various types of sedentary behaviour (SB). This study examined associations between adolescents’ objectively measured sedentary time, sitting time, specific self-reported SBs and social connectedness. Adolescents ( n = 429, 15.5 years, 41% male) completed an online survey reporting time in seven SBs (TV/videos/DVDs, computer/video games, internet, homework, reading, car and bus travel; examined individually and summed for screen time and total SB), and social connectedness using the eight-item Social Connectedness Scale. A subsample ( n = 353) also wore an ActiGraph GT3X+ (model GT3X+, Pensacola, FL, USA) accelerometer to measure sedentary time (<100 cpm) and n = 237 wore an activ PAL (PAL Technologies Ltd., Glasgow, Scotland) inclinometer to measure sitting time. Multiple linear mixed models determined associations between each SB variable and social connectedness, adjusting for confounders. Adolescents spent on average 7.8 h/day in self-reported total SB, 4.4 h/day in screen time, 9.1 h/day in ActiGraph-measured sedentary time, and 9.5 h/day in activ PAL-measured sitting time. After adjusting for age, sex and area level socioeconomic status, total SB (−0.24, 95%CI: −0.37, −0.11), screen time (−0.23, 95%CI: −0.41, −0.05) and two individual SBs (computer/video games (−1.07, 95%CI: −1.53, −0.60), homework (−0.61, 95%CI: −1.04, −0.18) were negatively associated with social connectedness. There were no associations with the objective measures. The relationships may be bi-directional; therefore, future research should involve longitudinal designs and explore other potential contributing factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauren Arundell & Jo Salmon & Jenny Veitch & Anna Timperio, 2019. "The Relationship between Objectively Measured and Self-Reported Sedentary Behaviours and Social Connectedness among Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-11, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:277-:d:199061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/2/277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/2/277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig Olsson & Rob McGee & Shyamala Nada-Raja & Sheila Williams, 2013. "A 32-Year Longitudinal Study of Child and Adolescent Pathways to Well-Being in Adulthood," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 1069-1083, June.
    2. Best, Paul & Manktelow, Roger & Taylor, Brian, 2014. "Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 27-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jenny Veitch & Elliott Flowers & Kylie Ball & Benedicte Deforche & Anna Timperio, 2020. "Exploring Children’s Views on Important Park Features: A Qualitative Study Using Walk-Along Interviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Sharon Parry & Beatriz IR de Oliveira & Joanne A. McVeigh & Joyln Ee & Angela Jacques & Leon Straker, 2019. "Standing Desks in a Grade 4 Classroom over the Full School Year," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Lauren Arundell & Jenny Veitch & Shannon Sahlqvist & Riaz Uddin & Nicola D. Ridgers & Jo Salmon & Anna Timperio & Kate Parker, 2021. "Changes in Families’ Leisure, Educational/Work and Social Screen Time Behaviours before and during COVID-19 in Australia: Findings from the Our Life at Home Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-10, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuwen Lyu & Julian Chun-Chung Chow & Ji-Jen Hwang & Zhi Li & Cheng Ren & Jungui Xie, 2022. "Psychological Well-Being of Left-Behind Children in China: Text Mining of the Social Media Website Zhihu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Griffith, David A. & Lee, Hannah S. & Yalcinkaya, Goksel, 2023. "Understanding the relationship between the use of social media and the prevalence of anxiety at the country level: a multi-country examination," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    3. Lee, Ah Ram & Suzanne Horsley, J., 2017. "The role of social media on positive youth development: An analysis of 4-H Facebook page and 4-H'ers' positive development," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 127-138.
    4. Shihui Feng & Cheng Yong Tan, 2024. "Toward conceptual clarity for digital cultural and social capital in student learning: Insights from a systematic literature review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Xilin Li & Yao Zhang & Ziwen Ye & Lingling Huang & Xujuan Zheng, 2021. "Development of a Mobile Application of Internet-Based Support Program on Parenting Outcomes for Primiparous Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-11, July.
    6. Tove Lafton & Halla B. Holmarsdottir & Olaf Kapella & Merike Sisask & Liudmila Zinoveva, 2022. "Children’s Vulnerability to Digital Technology within the Family: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Ahmed Al-Imam & Farah Al-Mukhtar & Aisha Shafiq & Manolia Irfan, 2017. "Knowledge and (Ab)Use in Connection with Novel Psychoactive Substances: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Iraqi Medical Students," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(11), pages 1-61, November.
    8. Mònica González-Carrasco & Ferran Casas & Sara Malo & Ferran Viñas & Tamar Dinisman, 2017. "Changes with Age in Subjective Well-Being Through the Adolescent Years: Differences by Gender," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 63-88, February.
    9. Cristina Fernández-Rovira & Santiago Giraldo-Luque, 2021. "Evolution of the Digital Attention Market in the Pandemic: A Comparative Study of Young Spanish University Students (2019–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Yunrong Li & Ricardo Mora, 2022. "On the use of social networking services and the ability to socialize: evidence from Chinese children aged 10 to 15," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(49), pages 5639-5654, October.
    11. Angel Nga Man Leung & Wilbert Law & Yvonne Yiqing Liang & Antony Chun Lam Au & Cheng Li & Henry Kin Shing Ng, 2021. "What Explains the Association between Usage of Social Networking Sites (SNS) and Depression Symptoms? The Mediating Roles of Self-Esteem and Fear of Missing Out," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-11, April.
    12. Hedviga Tkáčová & Martina Pavlíková & Zita Jenisová & Patrik Maturkanič & Roman Králik, 2021. "Social Media and Students’ Wellbeing: An Empirical Analysis during the Covid-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Chan, Chitat, 2018. "Analysing social networks for social work practice: A case study of the Facebook fan page of an online youth outreach project," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 143-150.
    14. Shah, Denish & Webster, Emily & Kour, Gurpreet, 2023. "Consuming for content? Understanding social media-centric consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    15. McDool, Emily & Powell, Philip & Roberts, Jennifer & Taylor, Karl, 2016. "Social Media Use and Children's Wellbeing," IZA Discussion Papers 10412, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Boban Melović & Anđela Jakšić Stojanović & Tamara Backović & Branislav Dudić & Zuzana Kovačičová, 2020. "Research of Attitudes toward Online Violence—Significance of Online Media and Social Marketing in the Function of Violence Prevention and Behavior Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    17. Anne M. Gadermann & Martin Guhn & Kimberly A. Schonert-Reichl & Shelley Hymel & Kimberly Thomson & Clyde Hertzman, 2016. "A Population-Based Study of Children’s Well-Being and Health: The Relative Importance of Social Relationships, Health-Related Activities, and Income," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1847-1872, October.
    18. Marín-López, Inmaculada & Zych, Izabela & Ortega-Ruiz, Rosario & Hunter, Simon C. & Llorent, Vicente J., 2020. "Relations among online emotional content use, social and emotional competencies and cyberbullying," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. John Coffey & Michael Warren & Allen Gottfried, 2015. "Does Infant Happiness Forecast Adult Life Satisfaction? Examining Subjective Well-Being in the First Quarter Century of Life," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1401-1421, December.
    20. Mohammed-Lutfi Al-Imam & Ahmed Al-Imam, 2017. "Knowledge and (Ab)Use in Connection with Novel Psychoactive Substances: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Psychedelic Users Existing on Online Platforms," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(11), pages 1-51, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:277-:d:199061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.