IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i8p1575-d159887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response to Noise Emitted by Wind Farms in People Living in Nearby Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska

    (Department of Physical Hazards, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 8, Sw. Teresy Str., 91-348 Lodz, Poland)

  • Kamil Zaborowski

    (Department of Physical Hazards, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 8, Sw. Teresy Str., 91-348 Lodz, Poland)

  • Adam Dudarewicz

    (Department of Physical Hazards, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 8, Sw. Teresy Str., 91-348 Lodz, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Zamojska-Daniszewska

    (Department of Physical Hazards, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 8, Sw. Teresy Str., 91-348 Lodz, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Waszkowska

    (Department of Work Psychology, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 8, Sw. Teresy Str., 91-348 Lodz, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the perception and annoyance of noise from wind turbines in populated areas of Poland. A questionnaire inquiry was carried out among 517 subjects, aged 18–88, living within 204–1726 m from the nearest wind turbine. For areas where respondents lived, A-weighted sound pressure levels (SPLs) were calculated as the sum of the contributions from the wind power plants in the specific area. It has been shown that the wind turbine noise at the calculated A-weighted SPL of 33–50 dB was perceived as annoying or highly annoying by 46% and 28% of respondents, respectively. Moreover, 34% and 18% of them said that they were annoyed or highly annoyed indoors, respectively. The perception of high annoyance was associated with the A-weighted sound pressure level or the distance from the nearest wind turbine, general attitude to wind farms, noise sensitivity and terrain shape (annoyance outdoors) or road-traffic intensity (annoyance indoors). About 48–66% of variance in noise annoyance rating might be explained by the aforesaid factors. It was estimated that at the distance of 1000 m the wind turbine noise might be perceived as highly annoying outdoors by 43% and 2% of people with negative and positive attitude towards wind turbines, respectively. There was no significant association between noise level (or distance) and various health and well-being aspects. However, all variables measuring health and well-being aspects, including stress symptoms, were positively associated with annoyance related to wind turbine noise.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska & Kamil Zaborowski & Adam Dudarewicz & Małgorzata Zamojska-Daniszewska & Małgorzata Waszkowska, 2018. "Response to Noise Emitted by Wind Farms in People Living in Nearby Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-36, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1575-:d:159887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1575/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1575/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedersen, Eja & van den Berg, Frits & Bakker, Roel & Bouma, Jelte, 2010. "Can road traffic mask sound from wind turbines? Response to wind turbine sound at different levels of road traffic sound," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2520-2527, May.
    2. Eja Pedersen, 2015. "City Dweller Responses to Multiple Stressors Intruding into Their Homes: Noise, Light, Odour, and Vibration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Luigi Maffei & Tina Iachini & Massimiliano Masullo & Francesco Aletta & Francesco Sorrentino & Vincenzo Paolo Senese & Francesco Ruotolo, 2013. "The Effects of Vision-Related Aspects on Noise Perception of Wind Turbines in Quiet Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hübner, Gundula & Leschinger, Valentin & Müller, Florian J.Y. & Pohl, Johannes, 2023. "Broadening the social acceptance of wind energy – An Integrated Acceptance Model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Irene van Kamp & Frits van den Berg, 2021. "Health Effects Related to Wind Turbine Sound: An Update," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Müller, Florian Johannes Yanic & Leschinger, Valentin & Hübner, Gundula & Pohl, Johannes, 2023. "Understanding subjective and situational factors of wind turbine noise annoyance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Irene van Kamp & Sendrick Simon & Hilary Notley & Christos Baliatsas & Elise van Kempen, 2020. "Evidence Relating to Environmental Noise Exposure and Annoyance, Sleep Disturbance, Cardio-Vascular and Metabolic Health Outcomes in the Context of IGCB (N): A Scoping Review of New Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Mucci & Veronica Traversini & Chiara Lorini & Simone De Sio & Raymond P. Galea & Guglielmo Bonaccorsi & Giulio Arcangeli, 2020. "Urban Noise and Psychological Distress: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Radun, Jenni & Maula, Henna & Saarinen, Pekka & Keränen, Jukka & Alakoivu, Reijo & Hongisto, Valtteri, 2022. "Health effects of wind turbine noise and road traffic noise on people living near wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Agnieszka Jaszczak & Ewelina Pochodyła & Katarina Kristianova & Natalia Małkowska & Jan K. Kazak, 2021. "Redefinition of Park Design Criteria as a Result of Analysis of Well-Being and Soundscape: The Case Study of the Kortowo Park (Poland)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Tabassum-Abbasi, & Premalatha, M. & Abbasi, Tasneem & Abbasi, S.A., 2014. "Wind energy: Increasing deployment, rising environmental concerns," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 270-288.
    5. Dongliang Yang & Xiangheng Liu & Zhichao Ren & Mingna Li, 2022. "Relation between Noise Pollution and Life Satisfaction Based on the 2019 Chinese Social Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Lida Liao & Yuliang Ling & Bin Huang & Xu Zhou & Hongbo Luo & Peiling Xie & Ying Wu & Jialiang Huang, 2020. "Toward a Survey-Based Assessment of Wind Turbine Noise: The Impacts on Wellbeing of Local Residents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Armin Taghipour & Tessa Sievers & Kurt Eggenschwiler, 2019. "Acoustic Comfort in Virtual Inner Yards with Various Building Facades," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Petrova, Maria A., 2016. "From NIMBY to acceptance: Toward a novel framework — VESPA — For organizing and interpreting community concerns," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1280-1294.
    9. Aneta Wierzbicka & Eja Pedersen & Roger Persson & Birgitta Nordquist & Kristian Stålne & Chuansi Gao & Lars-Erik Harderup & Jonas Borell & Héctor Caltenco & Barry Ness & Emilie Stroh & Yujing Li & Mat, 2018. "Healthy Indoor Environments: The Need for a Holistic Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, August.
    10. Luigi Maffei & Massimiliano Masullo & Maria Di Gabriele & Nefta-Eleftheria P. Votsi & John D. Pantis & Vincenzo Paolo Senese, 2015. "Auditory Recognition of Familiar and Unfamiliar Subjects with Wind Turbine Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Quan Qiu & Ling Yang & Mei He & Wen Gao & Harrison Mar & Jiyue Li & Guangyu Wang, 2022. "The Effects of Forest Therapy on the Blood Pressure and Salivary Cortisol Levels of Urban Residents: A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Ronny Klæboe & Hanne Beate Sundfør, 2016. "Windmill Noise Annoyance, Visual Aesthetics, and Attitudes towards Renewable Energy Sources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Zerrahn, Alexander, 2017. "Wind Power and Externalities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 245-260.
    14. Alamir, Mahmoud A. & Hansen, Kristy L. & Zajamsek, Branko & Catcheside, Peter, 2019. "Subjective responses to wind farm noise: A review of laboratory listening test methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Wang, Shifeng & Wang, Sicong, 2015. "Impacts of wind energy on environment: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 437-443.
    16. Kaldellis, J.K. & Garakis, K. & Kapsali, M., 2012. "Noise impact assessment on the basis of onsite acoustic noise immission measurements for a representative wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 306-314.
    17. Christidis, Tanya & Lewis, Geoffrey & Bigelow, Philip, 2017. "Understanding support and opposition to wind turbine development in Ontario, Canada and assessing possible steps for future development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 93-103.
    18. Daniel Shepherd & Kim Dirks & David Welch & David McBride & Jason Landon, 2016. "The Covariance between Air Pollution Annoyance and Noise Annoyance, and Its Relationship with Health-Related Quality of Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Pohl, Johannes & Hübner, Gundula & Mohs, Anja, 2012. "Acceptance and stress effects of aircraft obstruction markings of wind turbines," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 592-600.
    20. Matthias Braubach & Myriam Tobollik & Pierpaolo Mudu & Rosemary Hiscock & Dimitris Chapizanis & Denis A. Sarigiannis & Menno Keuken & Laura Perez & Marco Martuzzi, 2015. "Development of a Quantitative Methodology to Assess the Impacts of Urban Transport Interventions and Related Noise on Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1575-:d:159887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.