IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v114y2019ic15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective responses to wind farm noise: A review of laboratory listening test methods

Author

Listed:
  • Alamir, Mahmoud A.
  • Hansen, Kristy L.
  • Zajamsek, Branko
  • Catcheside, Peter

Abstract

Laboratory listening tests are a fundamental part of identifying and quantifying human perceptual responses to noise, including wind farm noise (WFN); a low-frequency environmental noise with time-varying components with the potential to impact more people as wind farm facilities continue to expand worldwide. Design characteristics of WFN listening tests vary between studies. This likely impacts WFN listening test results and makes quantitative comparisons difficult between studies. Accordingly, this paper reviews the available literature regarding WFN listening test methods, their overall characteristics and potentially important differences in noise stimuli and rating methods used. The key design variables explored include participant selection, stimuli duration, signal synthesis methods, noise reproduction methods and listening room characteristics. Listening test results from studies that have investigated the perceptual effects of various WFN components such as low-frequency noise and infrasound, tonality and amplitude modulation are presented. The impact on listening tests of factors unrelated to noise such as sensory acuity and sensitivity, attitudes/beliefs and visual effects are also explored. It is shown that some WFN characteristics have received limited attention to date in listening tests. These include broadband low-frequency noise, tonal noise, tonal amplitude modulation and amplitude modulation parameters such as modulation frequency and intermittency. The relative importance of acoustic and non-acoustic factors to human perception is also largely unknown and requires well-designed listening tests to help elucidate.

Suggested Citation

  • Alamir, Mahmoud A. & Hansen, Kristy L. & Zajamsek, Branko & Catcheside, Peter, 2019. "Subjective responses to wind farm noise: A review of laboratory listening test methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:114:y:2019:i:c:15
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032119305258
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katinas, Vladislovas & Marčiukaitis, Mantas & Tamašauskienė, Marijona, 2016. "Analysis of the wind turbine noise emissions and impact on the environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 825-831.
    2. Pedersen, Eja & van den Berg, Frits & Bakker, Roel & Bouma, Jelte, 2010. "Can road traffic mask sound from wind turbines? Response to wind turbine sound at different levels of road traffic sound," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2520-2527, May.
    3. Kaldellis, John K. & Zafirakis, D., 2011. "The wind energy (r)evolution: A short review of a long history," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1887-1901.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Merino-Martínez, Roberto & Pieren, Reto & Schäffer, Beat, 2021. "Holistic approach to wind turbine noise: From blade trailing-edge modifications to annoyance estimation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radun, Jenni & Maula, Henna & Saarinen, Pekka & Keränen, Jukka & Alakoivu, Reijo & Hongisto, Valtteri, 2022. "Health effects of wind turbine noise and road traffic noise on people living near wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Hötte, Kerstin & Pichler, Anton & Lafond, François, 2021. "The rise of science in low-carbon energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Wen, Binrong & Jiang, Zhihao & Li, Zhanwei & Peng, Zhike & Dong, Xingjian & Tian, Xinliang, 2022. "On the aerodynamic loading effect of a model Spar-type floating wind turbine: An experimental study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 306-319.
    4. Sharma, Kaushik & Ahmed, M. Rafiuddin, 2016. "Wind energy resource assessment for the Fiji Islands: Kadavu Island and Suva Peninsula," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 168-180.
    5. Kumar, Yogesh & Ringenberg, Jordan & Depuru, Soma Shekara & Devabhaktuni, Vijay K. & Lee, Jin Woo & Nikolaidis, Efstratios & Andersen, Brett & Afjeh, Abdollah, 2016. "Wind energy: Trends and enabling technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 209-224.
    6. Savino, Matteo M. & Manzini, Riccardo & Della Selva, Vincenzo & Accorsi, Riccardo, 2017. "A new model for environmental and economic evaluation of renewable energy systems: The case of wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 739-752.
    7. Satir, Mert & Murphy, Fionnuala & McDonnell, Kevin, 2018. "Feasibility study of an offshore wind farm in the Aegean Sea, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2552-2562.
    8. Sun, Xiaojing & Huang, Diangui & Wu, Guoqing, 2012. "The current state of offshore wind energy technology development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 298-312.
    9. Pagnini, Luisa C. & Burlando, Massimiliano & Repetto, Maria Pia, 2015. "Experimental power curve of small-size wind turbines in turbulent urban environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 112-121.
    10. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Iglińska, Anna & Koziński, Grzegorz & Skrzatek, Mateusz & Buczkowski, Roman, 2016. "Wind energy in Poland – History, current state, surveys, Renewable Energy Sources Act, SWOT analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 19-33.
    11. Tabassum-Abbasi, & Premalatha, M. & Abbasi, Tasneem & Abbasi, S.A., 2014. "Wind energy: Increasing deployment, rising environmental concerns," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 270-288.
    12. Lida Liao & Yuliang Ling & Bin Huang & Xu Zhou & Hongbo Luo & Peiling Xie & Ying Wu & Jialiang Huang, 2020. "Toward a Survey-Based Assessment of Wind Turbine Noise: The Impacts on Wellbeing of Local Residents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Haas, Christian & Kempa, Karol & Moslener, Ulf, 2023. "Dealing with deep uncertainty in the energy transition: What we can learn from the electricity and transportation sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Jiang, Jheng-Lun & Chang, Hong-Chan & Kuo, Cheng-Chien & Huang, Cheng-Kai, 2013. "Transient overvoltage phenomena on the control system of wind turbines due to lightning strike," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 181-189.
    15. Mathijs Peeters & Gilberto Santo & Joris Degroote & Wim Van Paepegem, 2017. "The Concept of Segmented Wind Turbine Blades: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Sahu, Bikash Kumar & Hiloidhari, Moonmoon & Baruah, D.C., 2013. "Global trend in wind power with special focus on the top five wind power producing countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 348-359.
    17. Mohammad Hosein Mohammadnezami & Mehdi Ali Ehyaei & Marc A. Rosen & Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi, 2015. "Meeting the Electrical Energy Needs of a Residential Building with a Wind-Photovoltaic Hybrid System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Teklebrhan Negash & Erik Möllerström & Fredric Ottermo, 2020. "An Assessment of Wind Energy Potential for the Three Topographic Regions of Eritrea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, April.
    19. Al-Nimr, Moh'd A. & Dawahdeh, Ahmad I. & Ali, Hussain A., 2022. "Power generation by integrating a thermally regenerative electrochemical cycle (TREC) with a solar pond and underground heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 663-675.
    20. Eduardo Martínez-Mendoza & Luis Arturo Rivas-Tovar & Luis Enrique García-Santamaría, 2021. "Wind energy in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec: conflicts and social implications," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 11706-11731, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:114:y:2019:i:c:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.