IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i2p249-d198255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acoustic Comfort in Virtual Inner Yards with Various Building Facades

Author

Listed:
  • Armin Taghipour

    (Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Acoustics/Noise Control, Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland)

  • Tessa Sievers

    (Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Acoustics/Noise Control, Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland)

  • Kurt Eggenschwiler

    (Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Acoustics/Noise Control, Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland)

Abstract

Housing complex residents in urban areas are not only confronted with typical noise sources, but also everyday life sounds, e.g., in the yards. Therefore, they might benefit from the increasing interest in soundscape design and acoustic comfort improvement. Three laboratory experiments (with repeated-measures complete block designs) are reported here, in which effects of several variables on short-term acoustic comfort were investigated. A virtual reference inner yard in the ODEON software environment was systematically modified by absorbers on building facades, whereby single-channel recordings were spatialized for a 2D playback in laboratory. Facade absorption was found, generally, to increase acoustic comfort. Too much absorption, however, was not found to be helpful. In the absence of any absorbers on the facade, absorbing balcony ceilings tended to improve acoustic comfort, however, non-significantly. Pleasant and unpleasant sounds were associated with comfort and discomfort, accordingly. This should encourage architects and acousticians to create comfortable inner yard sound environments, where pleasant and unpleasant sound occurrence probabilities are designed to be high and low, respectively. Furthermore, significant differences were observed between acoustic comfort at distinct observer positions, which could be exploited when designing inner yards.

Suggested Citation

  • Armin Taghipour & Tessa Sievers & Kurt Eggenschwiler, 2019. "Acoustic Comfort in Virtual Inner Yards with Various Building Facades," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:249-:d:198255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/2/249/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/2/249/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luigi Maffei & Tina Iachini & Massimiliano Masullo & Francesco Aletta & Francesco Sorrentino & Vincenzo Paolo Senese & Francesco Ruotolo, 2013. "The Effects of Vision-Related Aspects on Noise Perception of Wind Turbines in Quiet Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alvaro Balderrama & Jian Kang & Alejandro Prieto & Alessandra Luna-Navarro & Daniel Arztmann & Ulrich Knaack, 2022. "Effects of Façades on Urban Acoustic Environment and Soundscape: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Francesco Aletta & Jian Kang, 2019. "Promoting Healthy and Supportive Acoustic Environments: Going beyond the Quietness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-4, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Jaszczak & Ewelina Pochodyła & Katarina Kristianova & Natalia Małkowska & Jan K. Kazak, 2021. "Redefinition of Park Design Criteria as a Result of Analysis of Well-Being and Soundscape: The Case Study of the Kortowo Park (Poland)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Luigi Maffei & Massimiliano Masullo & Maria Di Gabriele & Nefta-Eleftheria P. Votsi & John D. Pantis & Vincenzo Paolo Senese, 2015. "Auditory Recognition of Familiar and Unfamiliar Subjects with Wind Turbine Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Małgorzata Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska & Kamil Zaborowski & Adam Dudarewicz & Małgorzata Zamojska-Daniszewska & Małgorzata Waszkowska, 2018. "Response to Noise Emitted by Wind Farms in People Living in Nearby Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-36, July.
    4. Anabela Botelho & Pedro Arezes & Carlos Bernardo & Hernâni Dias & Lígia M. Costa Pinto, 2017. "Effect of Wind Farm Noise on Local Residents’ Decision to Adopt Mitigation Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:249-:d:198255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.