IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgames/v16y2025i4p40-d1723507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Strategies in Product Warranty Pricing: A Hierarchical Game Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Henrique Santos

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biometria e Estatística Aplicada, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil)

  • Thyago Nepomuceno

    (Department of Statistics, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50740-560, Brazil
    Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the pricing dynamics of product warranties by developing a three-player hierarchical game model involving a manufacturer, an independent service agent, and a consumer. The model provides a scenario where the manufacturer and the agent form a coalition to coordinate pricing strategies, while interacting non-cooperatively with the consumer. In this framework, the manufacturer sets the product’s sale price, including the base warranty, while the agent determines the price of extended maintenance services. The key contribution is the application of the Shapley value to equitably distribute the coalition’s profits based on each member’s contribution—a novel approach in the warranty pricing literature. We detail the characteristic functions that define the coalition’s structure and present computer simulations to estimate the expected costs associated with maintenance services. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis is applied to report how changes in parameters influence equilibrium strategies and players’ payoffs. The results provide strategic insights into how manufacturers and agents can coordinate to optimize pricing, capture consumer surplus, and improve decision-making in warranty service markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrique Santos & Thyago Nepomuceno, 2025. "Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Strategies in Product Warranty Pricing: A Hierarchical Game Approach," Games, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:40-:d:1723507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/16/4/40/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/16/4/40/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anisur Rahman & Gopinath Chattopadhyay, 2006. "Review Of Long-Term Warranty Policies," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 453-472.
    2. Shaorong Sun & Na Sun, 2018. "Management Game Theory," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-13-1062-1, March.
    3. Boom, Anette, 1998. "Product risk sharing by warranties in a monopoly market with risk-averse consumers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 241-257, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dinopoulos, Elias & Livanis, Grigorios T. & West, Carol Taylor, 2005. "How Cool is C.O.O.L.?," Working Papers 15658, University of Florida, International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center.
    2. Dinopoulos, Elias & Livanis, Grigorios & West, Carol, 2010. "Country of Origin Labeling (C.O.O.L.): How cool is it?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 575-589, October.
    3. Wu, Shaomin, 2011. "Warranty claim analysis considering human factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 131-138.
    4. Nikunja Mohan Modak & Shibaji Panda & Shib Sankar Sana, 2015. "Managing a two-echelon supply chain with price, warranty and quality dependent demand," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1011014-101, December.
    5. Murthy, D. N. P. & Djamaludin, I., 2002. "New product warranty: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 231-260, October.
    6. Bhargava, Hemant K. & Sun, Daewon, 2008. "Pricing under quality of service uncertainty: Market segmentation via statistical QoS guarantees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 1189-1204, December.
    7. Tsvetanov, Tsvetan & Miceli, Thomas J. & Segerson, Kathleen, 2021. "Products liability with temptation bias," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 76-93.
    8. Esmaeili, M. & Shamsi Gamchi, N. & Asgharizadeh, E., 2014. "Three-level warranty service contract among manufacturer, agent and customer: A game-theoretical approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 177-186.
    9. Öner, K.B. & Kiesmüller, G.P. & van Houtum, G.J., 2010. "Optimization of component reliability in the design phase of capital goods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 615-624, September.
    10. Wu, Shaomin, 2013. "A review on coarse warranty data and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-11.
    11. Xiaolin Wang & Wei Xie, 2018. "Two-dimensional warranty: A literature review," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(3), pages 284-307, June.
    12. Gholamreza Askari & Madjid Eshaghi Gordji & Somayeh Shabani & Jose Antonio Filipe, 2020. "Game Theory and Trade Tensions between Advanced Economies," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 50-65.
    13. Moura, Márcio das Chagas & Santana, João Mateus & Droguett, Enrique López & Lins, Isis Didier & Guedes, Bruno Nunes, 2017. "Analysis of extended warranties for medical equipment: A Stackelberg game model using priority queues," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 338-354.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:40-:d:1723507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.