IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v17y2025i9p430-d1754350.html

AI-Driven Transformations in Manufacturing: Bridging Industry 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0 in Sustainable Value Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés Fernández-Miguel

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration (ICADE), Comillas Pontifical University, 28015 Madrid, Spain
    Department of Business Administration (ADO), Rey Juan Carlos University, 28933 Madrid, Spain)

  • Fernando Enrique García-Muiña

    (Department of Business Administration (ADO), Rey Juan Carlos University, 28933 Madrid, Spain)

  • Susana Ortíz-Marcos

    (School of Engineering (ICAI), Comillas Pontifical University, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

  • Mariano Jiménez-Calzado

    (School of Engineering (ICAI), Comillas Pontifical University, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

  • Alfonso P. Fernández del Hoyo

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration (ICADE), Comillas Pontifical University, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

  • Davide Settembre-Blundo

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration (ICADE), Comillas Pontifical University, 28015 Madrid, Spain
    Innovability Unit, Gresmalt Group, 41049 Sassuolo, Italy)

Abstract

This study investigates how AI-driven innovations are reshaping manufacturing value chains through the transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 6.0, particularly in resource-intensive sectors such as ceramics. Addressing a gap in the literature, the research situates the evolution of manufacturing within the broader context of digital transformation, sustainability, and regulatory demands. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining semi-structured interviews with key industry stakeholders and an extensive review of secondary data, to develop an Industry 6.0 model tailored to the ceramics industry. The findings demonstrate that artificial intelligence, digital twins, and cognitive automation significantly enhance predictive maintenance, real-time supply chain optimization, and regulatory compliance, notably with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). These technological advancements also facilitate circular economy practices and cognitive logistics, thereby fostering greater transparency and sustainability in B2B manufacturing networks. The study concludes that integrating AI-driven automation and cognitive logistics into digital ecosystems and supply chain management serves as a strategic enabler of operational resilience, regulatory alignment, and long-term competitiveness. While the industry-specific focus may limit generalizability, the study underscores the need for further research in diverse manufacturing sectors and longitudinal analyses to fully assess the long-term impact of AI-enabled Industry 6.0 frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés Fernández-Miguel & Fernando Enrique García-Muiña & Susana Ortíz-Marcos & Mariano Jiménez-Calzado & Alfonso P. Fernández del Hoyo & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2025. "AI-Driven Transformations in Manufacturing: Bridging Industry 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0 in Sustainable Value Chains," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:430-:d:1754350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/9/430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/9/430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kamble, Sachin S & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Parekh, Harsh & Mani, Venkatesh & Belhadi, Amine & Sharma, Rohit, 2022. "Digital twin for sustainable manufacturing supply chains: Current trends, future perspectives, and an implementation framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Suzana Ostojic & Lorenzo Simone & Mark Edler & Marzia Traverso, 2024. "How Practically Applicable Are the EU Taxonomy Criteria for Corporates?—An Analysis for the Electrical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Stefan Hunziker & Michael Blankenagel, 2024. "Research Design in Business and Management," Springer Books, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-658-42739-9, March.
    4. Justyna Patalas-Maliszewska & Małgorzata Szmołda & Hanna Łosyk, 2024. "Integrating Artificial Intelligence into the Supply Chain in Order to Enhance Sustainable Production—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    6. Ahmed Zainul Abideen & Jaafar Pyeman & Veera Pandiyan Kaliani Sundram & Ming-Lang Tseng & Shahryar Sorooshian, 2021. "Leveraging Capabilities of Technology into a Circular Supply Chain to Build Circular Business Models: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Carol A. Adams, 2020. "Sustainability Reporting and Value Creation," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 191-197, September.
    8. Bilal Chabane & Dragan Komljenovic & Georges Abdul-Nour, 2023. "Converging on human-centred industry, resilient processes, and sustainable outcomes in asset management frameworks," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 663-679, December.
    9. Andreja Primec & Jernej Belak, 2022. "Sustainable CSR: Legal and Managerial Demands of the New EU Legislation (CSRD) for the Future Corporate Governance Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten, 2018. "The Case for a New Discipline: Technosphere Science," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 212-225.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsega Y. Melesse & Chiara Franciosi & Valentina Di Pasquale & Stefano Riemma, 2023. "Analyzing the Implementation of Digital Twins in the Agri-Food Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Gary F. Peters & Andrea M. Romi & Juan Manuel Sanchez, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Sustainability Officers on Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1065-1087, November.
    3. Xu, Chong & Tao, Miaomiao & Qi, Lingli & Roubaud, David, 2025. "Can green CEOs trigger the green premium effect?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Zhu, Bo & Wang, Yiwei, 2024. "Green governance and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    5. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    6. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    7. Schawlowski Dan Michael, 2025. "The Correlation between Employee Benefits and Financial Performance: A Bibliometric Analysis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 294-303.
    8. Florian Kiesel & Felix Lücke, 2019. "ESG in credit ratings and the impact on financial markets," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 263-290, August.
    9. Yang Gao & Stephen Satchell & Nandini Srivastava, 2020. "Styles through a convergent/divergent lens: the curious case of ESG," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 4-12, February.
    10. Amrou Awaysheh & Randall A. Heron & Tod Perry & Jared I. Wilson, 2020. "On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(6), pages 965-987, June.
    11. Kwon, He-Boong & Lee, Jooh, 2019. "Exploring the differential impact of environmental sustainability, operational efficiency, and corporate reputation on market valuation in high-tech-oriented firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1-14.
    12. Andrea Lučić, 2020. "Measuring Sustainable Marketing Orientation—Scale Development Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Munshi Muhammad Abdul Kader Jilani & Luo Fan & Mohammad Tazul Islam & Md. Aftab Uddin, 2020. "The Influence of Knowledge Sharing on Sustainable Performance: A Moderated Mediation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Homroy, Swarnodeep, 2023. "GHG emissions and firm performance: The role of CEO gender socialization," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    15. Driss, Hamdi & Drobetz, Wolfgang & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane, 2024. "The Sustainability committee and environmental disclosure: International evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 602-625.
    16. Helfaya, Akrum & Aboud, Ahmed & Amin, Essam, 2023. "An examination of corporate environmental goals disclosure, sustainability performance and firm value – An Egyptian evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    17. Imen Khanchel & Naima Lassoued & Rym Gargoury, 2023. "CSR and firm value: is CSR valuable during the COVID 19 crisis in the French market?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(2), pages 575-601, June.
    18. Husain, Shaiara & Sohag, Kazi & Wu, Yanrui, 2022. "The response of green energy and technology investment to climate policy uncertainty: An application of twin transitions strategy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    19. Leonardo Becchetti & Emanuele Bobbio & Federico Prizia & Lorenzo Semplici, 2022. "Going Deeper into the S of ESG: A Relational Approach to the Definition of Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Ruijie Jin & Xu Jiang & Helen Wei Hu, 2023. "Internal and external CSR in China: How do women independent directors matter?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 169-204, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:430-:d:1754350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.