Author
Listed:
- Minxing Wang
(Laboratory for Models and Methods of Computational Pragmatics, School of Data Analysis and AI, Faculty of Computer Science, HSE University, 11 Pokrovskiy Boulevard, Moscow 109028, Russia)
- Pavel Braslavski
(Laboratory for Models and Methods of Computational Pragmatics, School of Data Analysis and AI, Faculty of Computer Science, HSE University, 11 Pokrovskiy Boulevard, Moscow 109028, Russia
Institute of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ural Federal University 19 Mira, Yekaterinburg 620062, Russia)
- Dmitry I. Ignatov
(Laboratory for Models and Methods of Computational Pragmatics, School of Data Analysis and AI, Faculty of Computer Science, HSE University, 11 Pokrovskiy Boulevard, Moscow 109028, Russia)
Abstract
Accurate and efficient cryptocurrency price prediction is vital for investors in the volatile crypto market. This study comprehensively evaluates nine models—including baseline, zero-shot, and deep learning architectures—on 21 major cryptocurrencies using daily and hourly data. Our multi-dimensional evaluation assesses models based on prediction accuracy (MAE, RMSE, MAPE), speed, statistical significance (Diebold–Mariano test), and economic value (Sharpe Ratio). Our research found that the optimally fine-tuned TimeGPT model (without variables) demonstrated superior performance across both Daily and Hourly datasets, with its statistical leadership confirmed by the Diebold–Mariano test. Fine-tuned Chronos excelled in daily predictions, while TFT was a close second to TimeGPT for hourly forecasts. Crucially, zero-shot models like TimeGPT and Chronos were tens of times faster than traditional deep learning models, offering high accuracy with superior computational efficiency. A key finding from our economic analysis is that a model’s effectiveness is highly dependent on market characteristics. For instance, TimeGPT with variables showed exceptional profitability in the volatile ETH market, whereas the zero-shot Chronos model was the top performer for the cyclical BTC market. This also highlights that variables have asset-specific effects with TimeGPT: improving predictions for ICP, LTC, OP, and DOT, but hindering UNI, ATOM, BCH, and ARB. Recognizing that prior research has overemphasized prediction accuracy, this study provides a more holistic and practical standard for model evaluation by integrating speed, statistical significance, and economic value. Our findings collectively underscore TimeGPT’s immense potential as a leading solution for cryptocurrency forecasting, offering a top-tier balance of accuracy and efficiency. This multi-dimensional approach provides critical, theoretical, and practical guidance for investment decisions and risk management, proving especially valuable in real-time trading scenarios.
Suggested Citation
Minxing Wang & Pavel Braslavski & Dmitry I. Ignatov, 2025.
"TimeGPT’s Potential in Cryptocurrency Forecasting: Efficiency, Accuracy, and Economic Value,"
Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jforec:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:48-:d:1746480
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:48-:d:1746480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.