IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jforec/v7y2025i3p48-d1746480.html

TimeGPT’s Potential in Cryptocurrency Forecasting: Efficiency, Accuracy, and Economic Value

Author

Listed:
  • Minxing Wang

    (Laboratory for Models and Methods of Computational Pragmatics, School of Data Analysis and AI, Faculty of Computer Science, HSE University, 11 Pokrovskiy Boulevard, Moscow 109028, Russia)

  • Pavel Braslavski

    (Laboratory for Models and Methods of Computational Pragmatics, School of Data Analysis and AI, Faculty of Computer Science, HSE University, 11 Pokrovskiy Boulevard, Moscow 109028, Russia
    Institute of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ural Federal University 19 Mira, Yekaterinburg 620062, Russia)

  • Dmitry I. Ignatov

    (Laboratory for Models and Methods of Computational Pragmatics, School of Data Analysis and AI, Faculty of Computer Science, HSE University, 11 Pokrovskiy Boulevard, Moscow 109028, Russia)

Abstract

Accurate and efficient cryptocurrency price prediction is vital for investors in the volatile crypto market. This study comprehensively evaluates nine models—including baseline, zero-shot, and deep learning architectures—on 21 major cryptocurrencies using daily and hourly data. Our multi-dimensional evaluation assesses models based on prediction accuracy (MAE, RMSE, MAPE), speed, statistical significance (Diebold–Mariano test), and economic value (Sharpe Ratio). Our research found that the optimally fine-tuned TimeGPT model (without variables) demonstrated superior performance across both Daily and Hourly datasets, with its statistical leadership confirmed by the Diebold–Mariano test. Fine-tuned Chronos excelled in daily predictions, while TFT was a close second to TimeGPT for hourly forecasts. Crucially, zero-shot models like TimeGPT and Chronos were tens of times faster than traditional deep learning models, offering high accuracy with superior computational efficiency. A key finding from our economic analysis is that a model’s effectiveness is highly dependent on market characteristics. For instance, TimeGPT with variables showed exceptional profitability in the volatile ETH market, whereas the zero-shot Chronos model was the top performer for the cyclical BTC market. This also highlights that variables have asset-specific effects with TimeGPT: improving predictions for ICP, LTC, OP, and DOT, but hindering UNI, ATOM, BCH, and ARB. Recognizing that prior research has overemphasized prediction accuracy, this study provides a more holistic and practical standard for model evaluation by integrating speed, statistical significance, and economic value. Our findings collectively underscore TimeGPT’s immense potential as a leading solution for cryptocurrency forecasting, offering a top-tier balance of accuracy and efficiency. This multi-dimensional approach provides critical, theoretical, and practical guidance for investment decisions and risk management, proving especially valuable in real-time trading scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Minxing Wang & Pavel Braslavski & Dmitry I. Ignatov, 2025. "TimeGPT’s Potential in Cryptocurrency Forecasting: Efficiency, Accuracy, and Economic Value," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:48-:d:1746480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/7/3/48/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/7/3/48/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stosic, Darko & Stosic, Dusan & Ludermir, Teresa B. & Stosic, Tatijana, 2019. "Exploring disorder and complexity in the cryptocurrency space," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 548-556.
    2. Sun, Xiaolei & Liu, Mingxi & Sima, Zeqian, 2020. "A novel cryptocurrency price trend forecasting model based on LightGBM," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    3. Andrés García-Medina & Ester Aguayo-Moreno, 2024. "LSTM–GARCH Hybrid Model for the Prediction of Volatility in Cryptocurrency Portfolios," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 1511-1542, April.
    4. Diebold, Francis X & Mariano, Roberto S, 2002. "Comparing Predictive Accuracy," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(1), pages 134-144, January.
    5. Kate Murray & Andrea Rossi & Diego Carraro & Andrea Visentin, 2023. "On Forecasting Cryptocurrency Prices: A Comparison of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Ensembles," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yilun Zhang & Yuping Song & Ying Peng & Hanchao Wang, 2024. "Volatility forecasting incorporating intraday positive and negative jumps based on deep learning model," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2749-2765, November.
    2. Bouri, Elie & Christou, Christina & Gupta, Rangan, 2022. "Forecasting returns of major cryptocurrencies: Evidence from regime-switching factor models," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    3. Giacomo di Tollo & Joseph Andria & Gianni Filograsso, 2023. "The Predictive Power of Social Media Sentiment: Evidence from Cryptocurrencies and Stock Markets Using NLP and Stochastic ANNs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Omer Burak Akgun & Emrah Gulay, 2025. "Dynamics in Realized Volatility Forecasting: Evaluating GARCH Models and Deep Learning Algorithms Across Parameter Variations," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 65(6), pages 3971-4013, June.
    5. Federico D'Amario & Milos Ciganovic, 2022. "Forecasting Cryptocurrencies Log-Returns: a LASSO-VAR and Sentiment Approach," Papers 2210.00883, arXiv.org.
    6. Bouteska, Ahmed & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Hajek, Petr & Yuan, Kunpeng, 2024. "Cryptocurrency price forecasting – A comparative analysis of ensemble learning and deep learning methods," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Tapia, Sebastian & Kristjanpoller, Werner, 2022. "Framework based on multiplicative error and residual analysis to forecast bitcoin intraday-volatility," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 589(C).
    8. Yang Zhou & Chi Xie & Gang-Jin Wang & Jue Gong & You Zhu, 2025. "Forecasting cryptocurrency volatility: a novel framework based on the evolving multiscale graph neural network," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-52, December.
    9. Moiz Qureshi & Hasnain Iftikhar & Paulo Canas Rodrigues & Mohd Ziaur Rehman & S. A. Atif Salar, 2024. "Statistical Modeling to Improve Time Series Forecasting Using Machine Learning, Time Series, and Hybrid Models: A Case Study of Bitcoin Price Forecasting," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Hauzenberger, Niko & Huber, Florian & Klieber, Karin & Marcellino, Massimiliano, 2025. "Bayesian neural networks for macroeconomic analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 249(PC).
    11. Laurence T Kell & Iago Mosqueira & Henning Winker & Rishi Sharma & Toshihide Kitakado & Massimiliano Cardinale, 2024. "Empirical validation of integrated stock assessment models to ensuring risk equivalence: A pathway to resilient fisheries management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Yamashiro, Hirochika & Nonaka, Hirofumi, 2021. "Estimation of processing time using machine learning and real factory data for optimization of parallel machine scheduling problem," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    13. Anatoly A. Peresetsky & Ruslan I. Yakubov, 2017. "Autocorrelation in an unobservable global trend: does it help to forecast market returns?," International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1/2), pages 152-169.
    14. Kelly Burns & Imad Moosa, 2017. "Demystifying the Meese–Rogoff puzzle: structural breaks or measures of forecasting accuracy?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(48), pages 4897-4910, October.
    15. Yuchen Zhang & Shigeyuki Hamori, 2020. "The Predictability of the Exchange Rate When Combining Machine Learning and Fundamental Models," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Hao Chen & Qiulan Wan & Yurong Wang, 2014. "Refined Diebold-Mariano Test Methods for the Evaluation of Wind Power Forecasting Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Antonello D’Agostino & Kieran Mcquinn & Karl Whelan, 2012. "Are Some Forecasters Really Better Than Others?," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(4), pages 715-732, June.
    18. Gaglianone, Wagner Piazza & Guillén, Osmani Teixeira de Carvalho & Figueiredo, Francisco Marcos Rodrigues, 2018. "Estimating inflation persistence by quantile autoregression with quantile-specific unit roots," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 407-430.
    19. Christophe Chorro & Florian Ielpo & Benoît Sévi, 2017. "The contribution of jumps to forecasting the density of returns," Post-Print halshs-01442618, HAL.
    20. Guglielmo Maria Caporale & Juncal Cuñado & Luis A. Gil-Alana, 2013. "Modelling long-run trends and cycles in financial time series data," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 405-421, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:48-:d:1746480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.