IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jfinte/v2y2023i3p22-413d1181665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Acceptance of Digital Asset and Crypto Investment Applications Based on the Use of Technology Model (UTAUT2)

Author

Listed:
  • Dian Palupi Restuputri

    (Industrial Engineering, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas 246, Malang 65144, Indonesia)

  • Figo Bimaraka Refoera

    (Industrial Engineering, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas 246, Malang 65144, Indonesia)

  • Ilyas Masudin

    (Industrial Engineering, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas 246, Malang 65144, Indonesia)

Abstract

In recent years, cryptocurrency has increased in popularity in Indonesia. In Indonesia, based on data from the Ministry of Trade (Kemendag), until the end of May 2021, the number of investors in cryptocurrency assets or crypto money was 6.5 million people. This number has increased by more than 50 percent when compared to 2020 when there were 4 million people. The Pintu application is the first crypto mobile application in Indonesia that is committed to solving crypto investment problems, especially for beginners and ordinary people. Even though it provides benefits, investing in cryptocurrency can provide high profits. In an instant, it can also make a profit. The motion, which is like a roller coaster, requires strong mental readiness to invest in cryptocurrencies. This should also be a critical consideration for investors, especially young investors. Therefore, it is necessary to understand what factors contribute to building stronger attitudes and behavioral intentions toward the PINTU application. This research analyzes the data using the use of technology 2 method with the partial least square (PLS) analysis technique method, which will later be processed in the form of data results in the form of responses of the user when using the application. Facilitating conditions and social influence are the most influential indicators. The results of the study show that behavioral intention to adopt has a relationship with behavioral intention to recommend, and behavioral intention to adopt positively and significantly influences the intention to recommend.

Suggested Citation

  • Dian Palupi Restuputri & Figo Bimaraka Refoera & Ilyas Masudin, 2023. "Investigating Acceptance of Digital Asset and Crypto Investment Applications Based on the Use of Technology Model (UTAUT2)," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:2:y:2023:i:3:p:22-413:d:1181665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/2/3/22/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/2/3/22/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jadil, Yassine & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model in the mobile banking literature: The moderating role of sample size and culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 354-372.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Md. Sharif Hassan & Md. Aminul Islam & Mohd Faizal bin Yusof & Hussen Nasir & Nasrin Huda, 2023. "Investigating the Determinants of Islamic Mobile FinTech Service Acceptance: A Modified UTAUT2 Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, February.
    4. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    5. Wan Rung Lin & Chun-Yueh Lin & Yu-Heng Ding, 2020. "Factors Affecting the Behavioral Intention to Adopt Mobile Payment: An Empirical Study in Taiwan," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Miao, Miao & Jayakar, Krishna, 2016. "Mobile payments in Japan, South Korea and China: Cross-border convergence or divergence of business models?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 182-196.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zaitul Zaitul & Novianti Neva & Ilona Desi, 2022. "Village-Based Tourism Performance: Tourist Satisfaction and Revisit Intention," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 36-43, June.
    2. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    3. Anca-Otilia Dodescu & Elena-Aurelia Botezat & Alexandru Constăngioară & Ioana-Crina Pop-Cohuţ, 2021. "A Partial Least-Square Mediation Analysis of the Contribution of Cross-Campus Entrepreneurship Education to Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Hao Zhang & Jie He & Xiaomeng Shi & Qiong Hong & Jie Bao & Shuqi Xue, 2020. "Technology Characteristics, Stakeholder Pressure, Social Influence, and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Express Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Pham, Dung & Jones, Paul & Dobson, Stephen & Liñán, Francisco & Viala, Céline, 2021. "Entrepreneurial implementation intention as a tool to moderate the stability of entrepreneurial goal intention: A sensemaking approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 97-105.
    6. Francesco Scafarto & Simona Balzano, 2012. "The Role and Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention at University Level: Theoretical Issues and New Empirical Evidence from Italy," DSI Essays Series, DSI - Dipartimento di Studi sull'Impresa, vol. 25.
    7. Swapan Kumar Saha & Guijun Zhuang & Sihan Li, 2020. "Will Consumers Pay More for Efficient Delivery? An Empirical Study of What Affects E-Customers’ Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay on Online Shopping in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Kânoğlu-Özkan, Dilge Güldehen & Soytaş, Uğur, 2022. "The social acceptance of shale gas development: Evidence from Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    9. Carsten Erfgen & Henrik Sattler & Isabel Victoria Villeda, 2016. "Effects of Celebrity Endorsers for Multiple Brands on Attitudes and Purchase Intentions," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 17(1), pages 49-67, April.
    10. Brigitta Plasek & Zoltán Lakner & Ágoston Temesi, 2022. "Environmental, Health or Social Impacts? Investigating Ethical Food Consumption Behavior in the Case of Palm Oil-Free Foods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-12, August.
    11. Wayne H. Stewart Jr. & Ruth C. May & Donna E. Ledgerwood, 2015. "Do You Know What I Know? Intent to Share Knowledge in the US and Ukraine," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 737-773, December.
    12. Loureiro, Sandra Maria Correia & Araújo, Cristiano Mineiro Branco de, 2014. "Luxury values and experience as drivers for consumers to recommend and pay more," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 394-400.
    13. Arumugam Seetharaman & Saurabh Singhal & Pankaj Galdhar & John Rudolph Raj & A. S. Saravanan, 2016. "Customers’ Expectations for Next Generation Internet Banking," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-28, March.
    14. Divine Ifransca Wijaya & Phimsupha Kokchang, 2023. "Factors Influencing Generation Z’s Pro-Environmental Behavior towards Indonesia’s Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Kuen-Hung Tsai & Hui-Chen Chang & Chen-Yi Peng, 2016. "Extending the link between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention: a moderated mediation model," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 445-463, June.
    16. Shuai Zhang & Jiannan Du & Huiji Yue & Gui’an Li & Dian Zhang, 2023. "Study on the National Identity Education Intentions of Pre-Service Teachers: Evidence from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    17. Christoph Weinert & Tim Weitzel, 2023. "Teleworking in the Covid-19 Pandemic," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(3), pages 309-328, June.
    18. Mohammad Alamgir Hossain & Mohammed Quaddus, 2015. "Radio frequency identification (RFID) adoption: A cross-sectional comparison of voluntary and mandatory contexts," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1057-1076, October.
    19. Juan Carlos Londono Roldan, 2015. "Intending to shop in single versus multi-channels: A Theory of Planned Behaviour-based explanation," Working Papers 11, Faculty of Economics and Management, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali.
    20. Brandford Bervell & Irfan Naufal Umar & Jeya Amantha Kumar & Beatrice Asante Somuah & Valentina Arkorful, 2021. "Blended Learning Acceptance Scale (BLAS) in Distance Higher Education: Toward an Initial Development and Validation," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:2:y:2023:i:3:p:22-413:d:1181665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.