IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i9p2268-d1645684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Sensitivity Analyses of Energy Consumption in Response to Average Speed Between Electric Vehicles and Conventional Vehicles: Case Study in Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xue Lei

    (Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive Transport, Ministry of Transport, Beijing Jiaotong University, 3 Shangyuan Cun, Haidian District, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Hongyu Lu

    (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA)

  • Pengfei Fan

    (Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive Transport, Ministry of Transport, Beijing Jiaotong University, 3 Shangyuan Cun, Haidian District, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Rui Liu

    (Beijing Capital Highway Development Group Company Limited, 9A, Liuliqiao Nanli, Fengtai District, Beijing 100161, China)

  • Songsong Li

    (Beijing Capital Highway Development Group Company Limited, 9A, Liuliqiao Nanli, Fengtai District, Beijing 100161, China)

  • Yizheng Wu

    (Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive Transport, Ministry of Transport, Beijing Jiaotong University, 3 Shangyuan Cun, Haidian District, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Guohua Song

    (Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive Transport, Ministry of Transport, Beijing Jiaotong University, 3 Shangyuan Cun, Haidian District, Beijing 100044, China
    MOE Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Technology for Intelligent Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, 3 Shangyuan Cun, Haidian District, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

Understanding the sensitivity of vehicle energy consumption to average speed variations is critical for accurately assessing the environmental impacts of urban transportation systems. While the energy consumption patterns of conventional vehicles (CVs) have been extensively studied, the response characteristics of electric vehicles (EVs) and their fundamental differences from CVs remain insufficiently explored. This knowledge gap may lead to misguided policy interventions—for instance, implementing congestion mitigation strategies that may paradoxically increase EV energy demand. To address this research gap, we developed an energy consumption model based on vehicle-specific power (VSP) distribution analysis, calibrated with over 25 million second-by-second driving records from Beijing. The proposed comparative framework systematically evaluates the sensitivity of EV and CV energy consumption across different speed regimes. The results indicated that EV energy use exhibits a distinctive parabolic trend, with high energy use at both low and high speeds, and a notable increase beyond approximately 70 km/h. A case study indicates that, during the pandemic lockdown, which led to a significant increase in average speed, CV energy use generally decreased, whereas EV energy consumption increased. This discrepancy is primarily attributed to differences in energy consumption rates rather than variations in driving behavior, as reflected in VSP distributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue Lei & Hongyu Lu & Pengfei Fan & Rui Liu & Songsong Li & Yizheng Wu & Guohua Song, 2025. "Comparative Sensitivity Analyses of Energy Consumption in Response to Average Speed Between Electric Vehicles and Conventional Vehicles: Case Study in Beijing, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2268-:d:1645684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2268-:d:1645684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.