IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i8p2038-d1635822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Methanol Injector Bore Arrangement on Combustion and Emissions in Dual-Fuel Engines

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Guo

    (School of Naval Architecture and Maritime, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China)

  • Jiarui Chen

    (School of Naval Architecture and Maritime, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China)

  • Xiwu Gong

    (School of Naval Architecture and Maritime, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China)

Abstract

The physical and chemical properties of methanol differ significantly from those of conventional diesel, and its injection strategy plays a critical role in engine performance. In this study, a three-dimensional simulation model of a methanol–diesel dual-fuel engine integrated with chemical reaction kinetics was developed using CONVERGE software. The effects of methanol injection position and angle on combustion characteristics, emission performance, and engine economy were systematically investigated through numerical simulation and theoretical analysis, leading to the optimization of the methanol injection strategy. By varying the distance between the methanol nozzle and the cylinder head as well as the methanol injection angle, changes in temperature, pressure, heat release rate (HRR), and other engine parameters were analyzed. Additionally, the impact on emissions, including soot, HC, CO, and NOx, was evaluated, providing a theoretical foundation for optimizing dual-fuel engine performance and enhancing methanol utilization efficiency. The results indicate that the methanol injection position minimally affects engine performance. When the methanol spray is positioned 3 mm from the cylinder head, it facilitates the formation of a homogeneous mixture, resulting in optimal power output and enhanced environmental performance. In contrast, the injection angle has a more pronounced effect on combustion and emission characteristics. At a methanol injection angle of 65°, the mixture homogeneity reaches its optimal level, leading to a significant enhancement in combustion efficiency and engine power performance. Excessive injection angles may lead to combustion deterioration and reduced engine performance. The primary reason is that an excessive spray angle may cause methanol spray to impinge on the cylinder wall. This leads to wall wetting, which adversely affects mixture formation and combustion.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Guo & Jiarui Chen & Xiwu Gong, 2025. "Effect of Methanol Injector Bore Arrangement on Combustion and Emissions in Dual-Fuel Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:2038-:d:1635822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/8/2038/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/8/2038/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maroteaux, Fadila & Saad, Charbel, 2015. "Combined mean value engine model and crank angle resolved in-cylinder modeling with NOx emissions model for real-time Diesel engine simulations at high engine speed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 515-527.
    2. Alanne, Kari & Saari, Arto, 2006. "Distributed energy generation and sustainable development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 539-558, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eid, Cherrelle & Codani, Paul & Perez, Yannick & Reneses, Javier & Hakvoort, Rudi, 2016. "Managing electric flexibility from Distributed Energy Resources: A review of incentives for market design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 237-247.
    2. Funcke, Simon & Bauknecht, Dierk, 2016. "Typology of centralised and decentralised visions for electricity infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 67-74.
    3. Moroni, Stefano & Antoniucci, Valentina & Bisello, Adriano, 2016. "Energy sprawl, land taking and distributed generation: towards a multi-layered density," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 266-273.
    4. Jingrui Li & Jietuo Wang & Teng Liu & Jingjin Dong & Bo Liu & Chaohui Wu & Ying Ye & Hu Wang & Haifeng Liu, 2019. "An Investigation of the Influence of Gas Injection Rate Shape on High-Pressure Direct-Injection Natural Gas Marine Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Anna Borkovcová & Miloslava Černá & Marcela Sokolová, 2022. "Blockchain in the Energy Sector—Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Di Battista, D. & Cipollone, R., 2016. "Experimental and numerical assessment of methods to reduce warm up time of engine lubricant oil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 570-580.
    7. Valentina Costa & Federico Campanini, 2024. "Community-Centred Energy Planning: Within and beyond Administrative Borders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Botelho, D.F. & de Oliveira, L.W. & Dias, B.H. & Soares, T.A. & Moraes, C.A., 2022. "Prosumer integration into the Brazilian energy sector: An overview of innovative business models and regulatory challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    9. Razieh Nejabat & Marina Van Geenhuizen, 2019. "Entrepreneurial Risk-Taking in Sustainable Energy: University Spin-Off Firms and Market Introduction in Northwest Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Newbery, David & Pollitt, Michael G. & Ritz, Robert A. & Strielkowski, Wadim, 2018. "Market design for a high-renewables European electricity system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 695-707.
    11. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Reino-Rio, Cipriano & Borge-Diez, David & Collado-Fernández, Eduardo, 2016. "Distributed generation: A review of factors that can contribute most to achieve a scenario of DG units embedded in the new distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1130-1148.
    12. Sanya Carley & Richard Andrews, 2012. "Creating a sustainable U.S. electricity sector: the question of scale," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(2), pages 97-121, June.
    13. Wouters, Carmen & Fraga, Eric S. & James, Adrian M., 2015. "An energy integrated, multi-microgrid, MILP (mixed-integer linear programming) approach for residential distributed energy system planning – A South Australian case-study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 30-44.
    14. Rämä, M. & Mohammadi, S., 2017. "Comparison of distributed and centralised integration of solar heat in a district heating system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 649-660.
    15. Busch, Jonathan & Roelich, Katy & Bale, Catherine S.E. & Knoeri, Christof, 2017. "Scaling up local energy infrastructure; An agent-based model of the emergence of district heating networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 170-180.
    16. Hepbasli, Arif, 2008. "A key review on exergetic analysis and assessment of renewable energy resources for a sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 593-661, April.
    17. Ren, Hongbo & Gao, Weijun, 2010. "A MILP model for integrated plan and evaluation of distributed energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 1001-1014, March.
    18. Fonseca, Juan D. & Commenge, Jean-Marc & Camargo, Mauricio & Falk, Laurent & Gil, Iván D., 2021. "Multi-criteria optimization for the design and operation of distributed energy systems considering sustainability dimensions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    19. Omu, Akomeno & Choudhary, Ruchi & Boies, Adam, 2013. "Distributed energy resource system optimisation using mixed integer linear programming," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 249-266.
    20. Avri Eitan & Gillad Rosen & Lior Herman & Itay Fishhendler, 2020. "Renewable Energy Entrepreneurs: A Conceptual Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:2038-:d:1635822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.