IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i6p1398-d1610527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-Renewable and Renewable Exergy Costs of Water Electrolysis in Hydrogen Production

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Lima

    (Research Institute for Energy and Resource Efficiency of Aragón (ENERGAIA), University of Zaragoza, Campus Río Ebro, Ed. CIRCE, c/ Mariano Esquillor Gómez 15, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jorge Torrubia

    (Research Institute for Energy and Resource Efficiency of Aragón (ENERGAIA), University of Zaragoza, Campus Río Ebro, Ed. CIRCE, c/ Mariano Esquillor Gómez 15, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Alicia Valero

    (Research Institute for Energy and Resource Efficiency of Aragón (ENERGAIA), University of Zaragoza, Campus Río Ebro, Ed. CIRCE, c/ Mariano Esquillor Gómez 15, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Antonio Valero

    (Research Institute for Energy and Resource Efficiency of Aragón (ENERGAIA), University of Zaragoza, Campus Río Ebro, Ed. CIRCE, c/ Mariano Esquillor Gómez 15, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

Hydrogen production via water electrolysis and renewable electricity is expected to play a pivotal role as an energy carrier in the energy transition. This fuel emerges as the most environmentally sustainable energy vector for non-electric applications and is devoid of CO 2 emissions. However, an electrolyzer’s infrastructure relies on scarce and energy-intensive metals such as platinum, palladium, iridium (PGM), silicon, rare earth elements, and silver. Under this context, this paper explores the exergy cost, i.e., the exergy destroyed to obtain one kW of hydrogen. We disaggregated it into non-renewable and renewable contributions to assess its renewability. We analyzed four types of electrolyzers, alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), proton exchange membrane (PEM), solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOEC), and anion exchange membrane (AEM), in several exergy cost electricity scenarios based on different technologies, namely hydro (HYD), wind (WIND), and solar photovoltaic (PV), as well as the different International Energy Agency projections up to 2050. Electricity sources account for the largest share of the exergy cost. Between 2025 and 2050, for each kW of hydrogen generated, between 1.38 and 1.22 kW will be required for the SOEC-hydro combination, while between 2.9 and 1.4 kW will be required for the PV-PEM combination. A Grassmann diagram describes how non-renewable and renewable exergy costs are split up between all processes. Although the hybridization between renewables and the electricity grid allows for stable hydrogen production, there are higher non-renewable exergy costs from fossil fuel contributions to the grid. This paper highlights the importance of non-renewable exergy cost in infrastructure, which is required for hydrogen production via electrolysis and the necessity for cleaner production methods and material recycling to increase the renewability of this crucial fuel in the energy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Lima & Jorge Torrubia & Alicia Valero & Antonio Valero, 2025. "Non-Renewable and Renewable Exergy Costs of Water Electrolysis in Hydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:1398-:d:1610527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1398/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1398/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorge Torrubia & César Torres & Alicia Valero & Antonio Valero & Ashak Mahmud Parvez & Mohsin Sajjad & Felipe García Paz, 2024. "Applying Circular Thermoeconomics for Sustainable Metal Recovery in PCB Recycling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Lozano, M.A. & Valero, A., 1993. "Theory of the exergetic cost," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 939-960.
    3. Stanek, Wojciech & Czarnowska, Lucyna & Gazda, Wiesław & Simla, Tomasz, 2018. "Thermo-ecological cost of electricity from renewable energy sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 87-96.
    4. Sciubba, Enrico, 2024. "A possible reconciliation between exergy analysis, thermo-economics and the resource cost of externalities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    5. Sciubba, Enrico, 2019. "Exergy-based ecological indicators: From Thermo-Economics to cumulative exergy consumption to Thermo-Ecological Cost and Extended Exergy Accounting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 462-476.
    6. Torrubia, Jorge & Valero, Alicia & Valero, Antonio, 2024. "Renewable exergy return on investment (RExROI) in energy systems. The case of silicon photovoltaic panels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    7. Pinto, Ricardo & Henriques, Sofia T. & Brockway, Paul E. & Heun, Matthew Kuperus & Sousa, Tânia, 2023. "The rise and stall of world electricity efficiency:1900–2017, results and insights for the renewables transition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    8. Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong & Dooner, Mark & Clarke, Jonathan, 2015. "Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 511-536.
    9. Busch, P. & Kendall, A. & Lipman, T., 2023. "A systematic review of life cycle greenhouse gas intensity values for hydrogen production pathways," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Bareiß, Kay & de la Rua, Cristina & Möckl, Maximilian & Hamacher, Thomas, 2019. "Life cycle assessment of hydrogen from proton exchange membrane water electrolysis in future energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 862-872.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph Sejkora & Lisa Kühberger & Fabian Radner & Alexander Trattner & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Exergy as Criteria for Efficient Energy Systems—A Spatially Resolved Comparison of the Current Exergy Consumption, the Current Useful Exergy Demand and Renewable Exergy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-51, February.
    2. Torrubia, Jorge & Valero, Alicia & Valero, Antonio, 2024. "Renewable exergy return on investment (RExROI) in energy systems. The case of silicon photovoltaic panels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    3. Lukas Kriechbaum & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Optimal Municipal Energy System Design and Operation Using Cumulative Exergy Consumption Minimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, January.
    4. Torrubia, Jorge & Valero, Antonio & Valero, Alicia, 2024. "Non-renewable and renewable levelized exergy cost of electricity (LExCOE) with focus on its infrastructure: 1900–2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    5. Capilla, Antonio Valero & Delgado, Alicia Valero & Cuadra, César Torres, 2024. "Expanding the horizons of thermoeconomics: Insights from the School of Zaragoza," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    6. Yasemin Merzifonluoglu & Eray Uzgoren, 2018. "Photovoltaic power plant design considering multiple uncertainties and risk," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(1), pages 153-184, March.
    7. Chen, Long Xiang & Xie, Mei Na & Zhao, Pan Pan & Wang, Feng Xiang & Hu, Peng & Wang, Dong Xiang, 2018. "A novel isobaric adiabatic compressed air energy storage (IA-CAES) system on the base of volatile fluid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 198-210.
    8. Miguel J. Prieto & Juan Á. Martínez & Rogelio Peón & Lourdes Á. Barcia & Fernando Nuño, 2017. "On the Convenience of Using Simulation Models to Optimize the Control Strategy of Molten-Salt Heat Storage Systems in Solar Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Wang, Longyi & Wu, Mei & Sun, Xiao & Gan, Zhihua, 2016. "A cascade pulse tube cooler capable of energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 572-578.
    10. Beretta, Gian Paolo & Iora, Paolo & Ghoniem, Ahmed F., 2014. "Allocating resources and products in multi-hybrid multi-cogeneration: What fractions of heat and power are renewable in hybrid fossil-solar CHP?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 587-603.
    11. Lukas Kriechbaum & Philipp Gradl & Romeo Reichenhauser & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Modelling Grid Constraints in a Multi-Energy Municipal Energy System Using Cumulative Exergy Consumption Minimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Gad, M.S. & Uysal, Cuneyt & El-Shafay, A.S. & Ağbulut, Ümit, 2024. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic assessments of a diesel engine fuelled with waste chicken fat biodiesel-diesel blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    13. Majumder, Suman & De, Krishnarti & Kumar, Praveen & Sengupta, Bodhisattva & Biswas, Pabitra Kumar, 2021. "Techno-commercial analysis of sustainable E-bus-based public transit systems: An Indian case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Andrea Dumančić & Nela Vlahinić Lenz & Lahorko Wagmann, 2024. "Profitability Model of Green Hydrogen Production on an Existing Wind Power Plant Location," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, February.
    15. Cheayb, Mohamad & Marin Gallego, Mylène & Tazerout, Mohand & Poncet, Sébastien, 2022. "A techno-economic analysis of small-scale trigenerative compressed air energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    16. Ziad Ragab & Ehsan Pashajavid & Sumedha Rajakaruna, 2024. "Optimal Sizing and Economic Analysis of Community Battery Systems Considering Sensitivity and Uncertainty Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Abram, Simone & Geach, Dale & Jenkins, David & McCallum, Peter & Peacock, Andrew, 2019. "Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 143-174.
    18. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    19. Seck, Gondia Sokhna & Hache, Emmanuel & D'Herbemont, Vincent & Guyot, Mathis & Malbec, Louis-Marie, 2023. "Hydrogen development in Europe: Estimating material consumption in net zero emissions scenarios," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. Javed, Muhammad Shahzad & Ma, Tao & Jurasz, Jakub & Canales, Fausto A. & Lin, Shaoquan & Ahmed, Salman & Zhang, Yijie, 2021. "Economic analysis and optimization of a renewable energy based power supply system with different energy storages for a remote island," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1376-1394.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:1398-:d:1610527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.