IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p646-d1580644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Burden in the United States: An Analysis Using Decision Trees

Author

Listed:
  • Jungwoo Chun

    (Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA)

  • Dania Ortiz

    (MIT Portugal Program, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (FEUP), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Brooke Jin

    (Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA)

  • Nikita Kulkarni

    (Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA)

  • Stephen Hart

    (Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA)

  • Janelle Knox-Hayes

    (Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA)

Abstract

The concept of energy burden (EB) continues to gain prominence in energy and associated policy research as energy prices rise and electricity and heating options diversify. This research offers a deeper understanding of EB dynamics and how EB can be addressed more effectively by discerning the interplay between regional environmental, social, and economic factors. Using decision trees (DTs), a powerful machine learning technique, we explore the multifaceted dynamics that shape EB across the United States (U.S.) by examining how factors like housing quality, demographic variations, access to energy sources, and regional economic conditions interact, creating distinct EB profiles across communities. Following a comprehensive review of existing literature and DT analysis, we map the results to identify the most significant factors influencing EB. We find that no single variable has a determinant effect on EB levels. While there is no uniform regional pattern, regions with higher population density exhibit a stronger correlation between EB and socioeconomic and other demographic factors such as educational attainment levels and racial segregation. Our findings underscore the significance of regional ecologies in shaping EB, revealing how localized environmental and economic contexts amplify or mitigate systemic inequities. Specifically, our analysis reveals significant regional disparities, highlighting the need for localized policies and interventions. We find that a one-size-fits-all approach is insufficient and that targeted, place-based strategies are necessary to address the specific needs of different communities. Policy interventions should prioritize energy democracy, address systemic inequities, and ensure universal energy access through participatory planning, financial assistance, and targeted initiatives such as housing rehabilitation, energy efficiency improvements, and incentives for underrepresented communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jungwoo Chun & Dania Ortiz & Brooke Jin & Nikita Kulkarni & Stephen Hart & Janelle Knox-Hayes, 2025. "Energy Burden in the United States: An Analysis Using Decision Trees," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-41, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:646-:d:1580644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/646/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/646/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:zbw:rwirep:0542 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Hosan, Shahadat & Sen, Kanchan Kumar & Rahman, Md Matiar & Chapman, Andrew J. & Karmaker, Shamal Chandra & Alam, Mohammad Jahangir & Saha, Bidyut Baran, 2024. "Energy innovation funding and social equity: Mediating role of just energy transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Manuel Frondel & Stephan Sommer & Colin Vance, 2015. "The burden of Germanyùs energy transition: An empirical analysis of distributional effects," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(c), pages 89-99.
    4. Eric Scheier & Noah Kittner, 2022. "A measurement strategy to address disparities across household energy burdens," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Kenneth Gillingham & David Rapson & Gernot Wagner, 2016. "The Rebound Effect and Energy Efficiency Policy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(1), pages 68-88.
    6. Yang, Shenbo & Fang, Jiangpeng & Zhang, Zheyu & Lv, ShuoShuo & Lin, Hongyu & Ju, Liwei, 2024. "Two-stage coordinated optimal dispatching model and benefit allocation strategy for rural new energy microgrid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Isaac, Morna & van Vuuren, Detlef P., 2009. "Modeling global residential sector energy demand for heating and air conditioning in the context of climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 507-521, February.
    8. Dominic J. Bednar & Tony G. Reames, 2020. "Recognition of and response to energy poverty in the United States," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(6), pages 432-439, June.
    9. Magdalena Cyrek & Piotr Cyrek & Wioletta Bieńkowska-Gołasa & Piotr Gołasa, 2024. "The Convergence of Energy Poverty across Countries in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Urszula Grzybowska & Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska & Gintarė Vaznonienė & Hanna Dudek, 2024. "Households Vulnerable to Energy Poverty in the Visegrad Group Countries: An Analysis of Socio-Economic Factors Using a Machine Learning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Manuel Frondel & Stephan Sommer & Colin Vance, 2015. "The Burden of Germany’s Energy Transition – An Empirical Analysis of Distributional Effects," Ruhr Economic Papers 0542, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    12. Blumstein, Carl & Krieg, Betsy & Schipper, Lee & York, Carl, 1980. "Overcoming social and institutional barriers to energy conservation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 355-371.
    13. Lei, Xiang & Yu, Hang & Shao, Ziyun & Jian, Linni, 2023. "Optimal bidding and coordinating strategy for maximal marginal revenue due to V2G operation: Distribution system operator as a key player in China's uncertain electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    14. Agbim, Chinelo & Araya, Felipe & Faust, Kasey M. & Harmon, Dana, 2020. "Subjective versus objective energy burden: A look at drivers of different metrics and regional variation of energy poor populations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    15. Erick C. Jones & Ariadna Reyes, 2023. "Identifying Themes in Energy Poverty Research: Energy Justice Implications for Policy, Programs, and the Clean Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jones, Andrew & Nock, Destenie & Samaras, Constantine & Qiu, Yueming (Lucy) & Xing, Bo, 2023. "Climate change impacts on future residential electricity consumption and energy burden: A case study in Phoenix, Arizona," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Oskar Szczygieł & Alena Harbiankova & Maria Manso, 2024. "Where Does Energy Poverty End and Where Does It Begin? A Review of Dimensions, Determinants and Impacts on Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Tony G. Reames & Dorothy M. Daley & John C. Pierce, 2021. "Exploring the Nexus of Energy Burden, Social Capital, and Environmental Quality in Shaping Health in US Counties," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Ku, Arthur Lin & Qiu, Yueming (Lucy) & Lou, Jiehong & Nock, Destenie & Xing, Bo, 2022. "Changes in hourly electricity consumption under COVID mandates: A glance to future hourly residential power consumption pattern with remote work in Arizona," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    5. Huang, Luling & Nock, Destenie, 2024. "Estimating the income-related inequality aversion to energy limiting behavior in the United States," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Hochman, Gal & Timilsina, Govinda R., 2017. "Energy efficiency barriers in commercial and industrial firms in Ukraine: An empirical analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 22-30.
    7. Drescher, Katharina & Janzen, Benedikt, 2021. "Determinants, persistence, and dynamics of energy poverty: An empirical assessment using German household survey data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Dogan, Eyup & Madaleno, Mara & Inglesi-Lotz, Roula & Taskin, Dilvin, 2022. "Race and energy poverty: Evidence from African-American households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Johannes Thema & Florin Vondung, 2020. "Expenditure-Based Indicators of Energy Poverty—An Analysis of Income and Expenditure Elasticities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Pride, Dominique & Little, Joseph & Mueller-Stoffels, Marc, 2018. "The value of residential energy efficiency in interior Alaska: A hedonic pricing analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 450-460.
    11. Antunes, Micaela & Teotónio, Carla & Quintal, Carlota & Martins, Rita, 2023. "Energy affordability across and within 26 European countries: Insights into the prevalence and depth of problems using microeconomic data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    12. Pereira, Diogo Santos & Marques, António Cardoso, 2023. "Are dynamic tariffs effective in reducing energy poverty? Empirical evidence from US households," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    13. Nishijima, Daisuke, 2017. "The role of technology, product lifetime, and energy efficiency in climate mitigation: A case study of air conditioners in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 340-347.
    14. Fankhauser, Samuel & Jotzo, Frank, 2017. "Economic growth and development with low-carbon energy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86850, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Apriani Soepardi & Pratikto Pratikto & Purnomo Budi Santoso & Ishardita Pambudi Tama & Patrik Thollander, 2018. "Linking of Barriers to Energy Efficiency Improvement in Indonesia’s Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Singh, Sanjeet & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Apostu, Simona-Andreea & Bansal, Pooja, 2023. "Overcoming the shock of energy depletion for energy policy? Tracing the missing link between energy depletion, renewable energy development and decarbonization in the USA," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    17. Chen, Han & Huang, Ye & Shen, Huizhong & Chen, Yilin & Ru, Muye & Chen, Yuanchen & Lin, Nan & Su, Shu & Zhuo, Shaojie & Zhong, Qirui & Wang, Xilong & Liu, Junfeng & Li, Bengang & Tao, Shu, 2016. "Modeling temporal variations in global residential energy consumption and pollutant emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 820-829.
    18. De Borger, Bruno & Mulalic, Ismir & Rouwendal, Jan, 2016. "Measuring the rebound effect with micro data: A first difference approach," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-17.
    19. Katris, Antonios & Turner, Karen, 2021. "Can different approaches to funding household energy efficiency deliver on economic and social policy objectives? ECO and alternatives in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Frondel Manuel & Kutzschbauch Ole & Sommer Stephan & Traub Stefan, 2017. "Die Gerechtigkeitslücke in der Verteilung der Kosten der Energiewende auf die privaten Haushalte," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 18(4), pages 335-347, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:646-:d:1580644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.