IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p636-d1580329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermal Insulation of Agricultural Buildings Using Different Biomass Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Kamila Ewelina Mazur

    (Institute of Technology and Life Sciences—National Research Institute, Falenty, 3 Hrabska Avenue, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Witold Jan Wardal

    (Institute of Wood Sciences and Furniture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Jan Barwicki

    (Agency for Restructuring and Modernization of Agriculture in Warsaw, Poleczki, 02-822 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Mikhail Tseyko

    (POLBIOM Polish Biomass Society, 01-839 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The main goal of the article is to present the effectiveness of biomass as a thermal insulator and estimate the global potential for using biomass, considering the perspective of sustainable development and improving energy efficiency in agricultural building construction. The article presents two types of piggery construction: one using typical materials like concrete and the other using biomass-based materials. The evaluation is based on carbon footprint and embodied energy indicators. The model calculations developed in this article may be used in the future for life cycle assessment (LCA) analyses of specific construction solutions for rural livestock buildings. Two model variants for constructing a pigsty with different insulating materials were compared. The TB (Traditional Building) variant consisted of layers of (AAC) Autoclaved Aerated Concrete, glass wool, and brick. The second model variant, HB (Hempcrete Building), was made of concrete blocks with the addition of industrial hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) shives. Regarding footprint evaluation, bio-based materials often have a net-negative carbon footprint due to the sequestration effect. The results showed a significant difference in the carbon footprint of both TB and HB solutions—the carbon footprint of the HB variant was only 9.02% of that of the TB variant. The insulation properties of hempcrete were also compared to those of the most frequently used insulating materials in construction, such as glass wool and rock wool. The novelty of the study lies in analyzing the potential use of biomass for thermal insulation in livestock buildings, considering various raw materials, including their industrial properties and the ecological benefits resulting from their implementation. In addition, the authors focused on biomass thermal insulation from the perspective of sustainable development and improving energy efficiency in building construction. Our evaluation and selection of the best solutions are based on the indicators of embodied energy and carbon footprint.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamila Ewelina Mazur & Witold Jan Wardal & Jan Barwicki & Mikhail Tseyko, 2025. "Thermal Insulation of Agricultural Buildings Using Different Biomass Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:636-:d:1580329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/636/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/636/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golnaz Mohebbi & Ali Bahadori-Jahromi & Marco Ferri & Anastasia Mylona, 2021. "The Role of Embodied Carbon Databases in the Accuracy of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Calculations for the Embodied Carbon of Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Röck, Martin & Saade, Marcella Ruschi Mendes & Balouktsi, Maria & Rasmussen, Freja Nygaard & Birgisdottir, Harpa & Frischknecht, Rolf & Habert, Guillaume & Lützkendorf, Thomas & Passer, Alexander, 2020. "Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    3. Jacek Michalak & Sebastian Czernik & Marta Marcinek & Bartosz Michałowski, 2020. "Environmental burdens of External Thermal Insulation Systems. Expanded Polystyrene vs. Mineral Wool: Case Study from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Yohanis, Y.G. & Norton, B., 2002. "Life-cycle operational and embodied energy for a generic single-storey office building in the UK," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 77-92.
    5. Amir Ali & Anas Issa & Ahmed Elshaer, 2024. "A Comprehensive Review and Recent Trends in Thermal Insulation Materials for Energy Conservation in Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-42, October.
    6. Kamil Roman & Emilia Grzegorzewska, 2024. "The Comparison of Physical and Chemical Properties of Pellets and Briquettes from Hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Marco Pedroso & Maria da Glória Gomes & José Dinis Silvestre & Ahmed Hawreen & Inês Flores-Colen, 2023. "Thermophysical Parameters and Hygrothermal Simulation of Aerogel-Based Fibre-Enhanced Thermal Insulating Renders Applied on Exterior Walls," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-33, March.
    8. Kamila Ewelina Mazur & Jan Barwicki & Vitalii Tseiko, 2024. "Comparison of Mechanized and Automated Technologies in the Scope of Cumulative Energy in Sustainable Milk Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacek Michalak & Bartosz Michałowski, 2022. "Understanding Sustainability of Construction Products: Answers from Investors, Contractors, and Sellers of Building Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Geeth Jayathilaka & Niraj Thurairajah & Akila Rathnasinghe, 2023. "Digital Data Management Practices for Effective Embodied Carbon Estimation: A Systematic Evaluation of Barriers for Adoption in the Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Mohamed, Ahmed M.A. & Al-Habaibeh, Amin & Abdo, Hafez & Elabar, Sherifa, 2015. "Towards exporting renewable energy from MENA region to Europe: An investigation into domestic energy use and householders’ energy behaviour in Libya," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 247-262.
    4. Darja Kubečková & Magdaléna Vrbová, 2021. "Historical Development of Thermal Protection of Prefab Residential Housing and Its Future, an Example of the Czech Republic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Maria Cristina Collivignarelli & Giacomo Cillari & Paola Ricciardi & Marco Carnevale Miino & Vincenzo Torretta & Elena Cristina Rada & Alessandro Abbà, 2020. "The Production of Sustainable Concrete with the Use of Alternative Aggregates: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-34, September.
    6. Marin Pellan & Denise Almeida & Mathilde Louërat & Guillaume Habert, 2024. "Integrating Consumption-Based Metrics into Sectoral Carbon Budgets to Enhance Sustainability Monitoring of Building Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Fahlstedt, Oskar & Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka & Lohne, Jardar & Bohne, Rolf André, 2022. "Holistic assessment of carbon abatement strategies in building refurbishment literature — A scoping review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    8. Luca Evangelisti & Edoardo De Cristo & Salvatore Monteleone & Claudia Guattari & Paola Gori & Ivan Pini & Tullio de Rubeis & Dario Ambrosini, 2025. "A New Customized Measurement System for a Non-Contact, Enhanced Thermometric Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Rai, Deepak & Sodagar, Behzad & Fieldson, Rosi & Hu, Xiao, 2011. "Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in a distribution warehouse," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2271-2277.
    10. Haonan Zhang, 2023. "Leveraging policy instruments and financial incentives to reduce embodied carbon in energy retrofits," Papers 2304.03403, arXiv.org.
    11. Lachlan Curmi & Kumudu Kaushalya Weththasinghe & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Global Policy Review on Embodied Flows: Recommendations for Australian Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Augusto Mussi Alvim & Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet, 2021. "Climate Change Policies and the Carbon Tax Effect on Meat and Dairy Industries in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Catalin Popescu & Hiranya Dissanayake & Egla Mansi & Adrian Stancu, 2024. "Eco Breakthroughs: Sustainable Materials Transforming the Future of Our Planet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-38, December.
    14. Maximilian Weigert & Oleksandr Melnyk & Leopold Winkler & Jacqueline Raab, 2022. "Carbon Emissions of Construction Processes on Urban Construction Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    15. Reza Broun & Hamed Babaizadeh & Abolfazl Zakersalehi & Gillian F. Menzies, 2014. "Integrated Life Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Analysis of Exterior Wall Systems for Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-12, November.
    16. Claudio Zandonella Callegher & Gianluca Grazieschi & Eric Wilczynski & Ulrich Filippi Oberegger & Simon Pezzutto, 2023. "Assessment of Building Materials in the European Residential Building Stock: An Analysis at EU27 Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Rosaria E.C. Amaral & Joel Brito & Matt Buckman & Elicia Drake & Esther Ilatova & Paige Rice & Carlos Sabbagh & Sergei Voronkin & Yewande S. Abraham, 2020. "Waste Management and Operational Energy for Sustainable Buildings: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Jingwen Liu & Chungyeon Won, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Façade Typologies on Life Cycle Embodied Carbon in University Building Retrofits: A Case Study of South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Qiyuan Li & Wei Yang & Niklaus Kohler & Lu Yang & Jie Li & Zhen Sun & Hanze Yu & Lu Liu & Jun Ren, 2023. "A BIM–LCA Approach for the Whole Design Process of Green Buildings in the Chinese Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-32, February.
    20. Browne, David & O'Regan, Bernadette & Moles, Richard, 2009. "Use of ecological footprinting to explore alternative domestic energy and electricity policy scenarios in an Irish city-region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2205-2213, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:636-:d:1580329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.