IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i14p3812-d1704016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Organic Solid By-Products from Table Olive Processing: Influence of Substrate Mixtures on Overall Process Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Encarnación Díaz-Domínguez

    (Department of Environmental Technologies, Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, IVAGRO-Wine and Agrifood Research Institute, University of Cadiz, 11510 Cadiz, Spain)

  • José Ángel Rubio

    (Department of Environmental Technologies, Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, IVAGRO-Wine and Agrifood Research Institute, University of Cadiz, 11510 Cadiz, Spain)

  • James Lyng

    (School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, D04 C1P1 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Enrique Toro

    (Empresa Metropolitana de Abastecimiento y Saneamiento de Aguas de Sevilla S.A. (EMASESA), C/Escuelas Pías, 41003 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Fernando Estévez

    (Empresa Metropolitana de Abastecimiento y Saneamiento de Aguas de Sevilla S.A. (EMASESA), C/Escuelas Pías, 41003 Sevilla, Spain)

  • José L. García-Morales

    (Department of Environmental Technologies, Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, IVAGRO-Wine and Agrifood Research Institute, University of Cadiz, 11510 Cadiz, Spain)

Abstract

Sewage sludge, characterized by its high organic matter and nutrient content, as well as the presence of microbial pathogens and other contaminants, requires proper management due to its significant generation rate. The table olive sector, which is highly significant in Spain as a global leader in production and export, generates various waste streams such the Organic Solid By-Products from Table Olive Processing (OSBTOP), which are mainly derived from the olive pit after the pitting process. The main aim of this study was to enhance the methane production performance of sewage sludge through co-digestion with OSBTOP as a co-substrate. Batch assays demonstrated that employing OSBTOP as a co-substrate increased methane content by 35–41% across all tested mixtures. While the highest methane yield was produced at a 40:60 (sludge:OSBTOP) ratio, a 60:40 mixture proved to be a more advantageous option for scale-up and practical application. This is attributed to factors such as the higher availability of sludge and its inherent buffering capacity, which counteracts the accumulation of volatile fatty acids and promotes process stability, thereby contributing to the study’s objective of significantly enhancing methane production from sewage sludge through co-digestion. In semi-continuous operation, methane yields in the co-digestion scenario exceeded those of mixed sludge digestion, showing a yield of 180 versus 120 LCH 4 −1 · kgVS added −1 , representing a 50% improvement. This study highlights the potential of anaerobic digestion as a strategy for valorizing OSBTOP, a by-product with no prior studies, while demonstrating that its co-digestion with sewage sludge enhances methane generation, offering a sustainable approach to organic waste treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Encarnación Díaz-Domínguez & José Ángel Rubio & James Lyng & Enrique Toro & Fernando Estévez & José L. García-Morales, 2025. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Organic Solid By-Products from Table Olive Processing: Influence of Substrate Mixtures on Overall Process Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3812-:d:1704016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3812/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3812/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mao, Chunlan & Wang, Xiaojiao & Xi, Jianchao & Feng, Yongzhong & Ren, Guangxin, 2017. "Linkage of kinetic parameters with process parameters and operational conditions during anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 352-360.
    2. Ajayi-Banji, A. & Rahman, S., 2022. "A review of process parameters influence in solid-state anaerobic digestion: Focus on performance stability thresholds," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Mao, Chunlan & Feng, Yongzhong & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin, 2015. "Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 540-555.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shengrong Xue & Nan Zhao & Jinghui Song & Xiaojiao Wang, 2019. "Interactive Effects of Chemical Composition of Food Waste during Anaerobic Co-Digestion under Thermophilic Temperature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Alejandro Moure Abelenda & Kirk T. Semple & George Aggidis & Farid Aiouache, 2022. "Circularity of Bioenergy Residues: Acidification of Anaerobic Digestate Prior to Addition of Wood Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Amar Naji & Sabrina Guérin Rechdaoui & Elise Jabagi & Carlyne Lacroix & Sam Azimi & Vincent Rocher, 2023. "Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Wastewater Sludge with Lignocellulosic Waste: A Study of Performance and Limits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Wang, Hui & Zeng, Shufang & Pan, Xiaoli & Liu, Lei & Chen, Yunjie & Tang, Jiawei & Luo, Feng, 2022. "Bioelectrochemically assisting anaerobic digestion enhanced methane production under low-temperature," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1071-1083.
    5. Arshad, Muhammad & Bano, Ijaz & Khan, Nasrullah & Shahzad, Mirza Imran & Younus, Muhammad & Abbas, Mazhar & Iqbal, Munawar, 2018. "Electricity generation from biogas of poultry waste: An assessment of potential and feasibility in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1241-1246.
    6. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Obianuju Patience Ilo & Mulala Danny Simatele & S’phumelele Lucky Nkomo & Ntandoyenkosi Malusi Mkhize & Nagendra Gopinath Prabhu, 2021. "Methodological Approaches to Optimising Anaerobic Digestion of Water Hyacinth for Energy Efficiency in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Capson-Tojo, G. & Moscoviz, R. & Astals, S. & Robles, Á. & Steyer, J.-P., 2020. "Unraveling the literature chaos around free ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Khan, Mohd Atiqueuzzaman & Ngo, Huu Hao & Guo, Wenshan & Liu, Yiwen & Zhang, Xinbo & Guo, Jianbo & Chang, Soon Woong & Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Wang, Jie, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 754-768.
    10. Singh, Deval & Tembhare, Mamta & Machhirake, Nitesh & Kumar, Sunil, 2023. "Biogas generation potential of discarded food waste residue from ultra-processing activities at food manufacturing and packaging industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    11. Yermek Abilmazhinov & Kapan Shakerkhan & Vladimir Meshechkin & Yerzhan Shayakhmetov & Nurzhan Nurgaliyev & Anuarbek Suychinov, 2023. "Mathematical Modeling for Evaluating the Sustainability of Biogas Generation through Anaerobic Digestion of Livestock Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Mohamed A. Hassaan & Antonio Pantaleo & Francesco Santoro & Marwa R. Elkatory & Giuseppe De Mastro & Amany El Sikaily & Safaa Ragab & Ahmed El Nemr, 2020. "Techno-Economic Analysis of ZnO Nanoparticles Pretreatments for Biogas Production from Barley Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    13. Guohui Song & Xiaobo Cui & Liang Wang & Zheng Wei, 2025. "Comparative Assessment of Biomass and Power-to-Gas Processes Integrated with Different Electricity-Driven Gasification Technologies," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Hassan, Muhammad & Umar, Muhammad & Ding, Weimin & Mehryar, Esmaeil & Zhao, Chao, 2017. "Methane enhancement through co-digestion of chicken manure and oxidative cleaved wheat straw: Stability performance and kinetic modeling perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2314-2320.
    15. Huang, Bao-Cheng & Li, Wen-Wei & Wang, Xu & Lu, Yan & Yu, Han-Qing, 2019. "Customizing anaerobic digestion-coupled processes for energy-positive and sustainable treatment of municipal wastewater," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 132-142.
    16. Arora, Amarpreet Singh & Nawaz, Alam & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Ismail, Sherif & Aslam, Muhammad & Tawfik, Ahmed & Yun, Choa Mun & Lee, Moonyong, 2021. "Energy saving anammox technology-based nitrogen removal and bioenergy recovery from wastewater: Inhibition mechanisms, state-of-the-art control strategies, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Ozoegwu, C.G. & Eze, C. & Onwosi, C.O. & Mgbemene, C.A. & Ozor, P.A., 2017. "Biomass and bioenergy potential of cassava waste in Nigeria: Estimations based partly on rural-level garri processing case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 625-638.
    18. Syaichurrozi, Iqbal & Basyir, M. Fakhri & Farraz, Rafi Muhammad & Rusdi, Rusdi, 2020. "A preliminary study: Effect of initial pH and Saccharomyces cerevisiae addition on biogas production from acid-pretreated Salvinia molesta and kinetics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    19. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    20. Juan Félix González & Carmen María Álvez-Medina & Sergio Nogales-Delgado, 2023. "Biogas Steam Reforming in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Opportunities and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-35, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3812-:d:1704016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.