IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v167y2022ics1364032122006426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of process parameters influence in solid-state anaerobic digestion: Focus on performance stability thresholds

Author

Listed:
  • Ajayi-Banji, A.
  • Rahman, S.

Abstract

Process parameters such as pH, ammonia, and volatile fatty acids are physico-chemical indicators of stress level, reactor performance, and methane yield in anaerobic digestion. Unlike liquid-state anaerobic digestion, there are no established and specified thresholds of these parameters to ensure balance among anaerobic microbes and effective reactor performance in solid-state anaerobic digestion (SSAD). Thus, this review examines SSAD literature from the past twenty-one years and draws out process parameter thresholds that apply to SSAD. It further discusses the strength and limitations of these parameters in actualizing this task. Summarily, to minimize acid inhibition in the SSAD reactor, avoid VFA/Alk >1.5. This is in addition to maintaining a pH within 7.5–8.3 to optimize methanogens activities in SSAD and avoiding ammonia concentration >9.0 g/L which could completely disrupt the archaea activities. In addition, SSAD with an initial C/N ratio between 10 and 29 is likely to avoid inhibition and be successful.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajayi-Banji, A. & Rahman, S., 2022. "A review of process parameters influence in solid-state anaerobic digestion: Focus on performance stability thresholds," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:167:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122006426
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122006426
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112756?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajayi-Banji, A.A. & Sunoj, S. & Igathinathane, C. & Rahman, S., 2021. "Kinetic studies of alkaline-pretreated corn stover co-digested with upset dairy manure under solid-state," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 2198-2207.
    2. Lin, Yunqin & Liang, Jiajin & Zeng, Chao & Wang, Dehan & Lin, Huanjia, 2017. "Anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill sludge pretreated by microbial consortium OEM1 with simultaneous degradation of lignocellulose and chlorophenols," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 108-115.
    3. Sahoo, Kamalakanta & Mani, Sudhagar, 2019. "Economic and environmental impacts of an integrated-state anaerobic digestion system to produce compressed natural gas from organic wastes and energy crops," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Kothari, Richa & Pandey, A.K. & Kumar, S. & Tyagi, V.V. & Tyagi, S.K., 2014. "Different aspects of dry anaerobic digestion for bio-energy: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 174-195.
    5. Salehiyoun, Ahmad Reza & Zilouei, Hamid & Safari, Mohammad & Di Maria, Francesco & Samadi, Seyed Hashem & Norouzi, Omid, 2022. "An investigation for improving dry anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes by adding biochar derived from gasification of wood pellets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 1-9.
    6. Li, Yebo & Park, Stephen Y. & Zhu, Jiying, 2011. "Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 821-826, January.
    7. Xiao, Youqian & Yang, Hongnan & Zheng, Dan & Liu, Yi & Deng, Liangwei, 2022. "Alleviation of ammonia inhibition in dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Xinxin & Han, Ruirui & Song, Chuang & Liu, Yanping, 2022. "Preparation of polyvinyl alcohol-calcium sustained-release agent employed to degrade long-chain fatty acids and improve the performance of anaerobic digestion of food waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 653-661.
    2. Li, Wangliang & Gupta, Rohit & Zhang, Zhikai & Cao, Lixia & Li, Yanqing & Show, Pau Loke & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Kumar, Sunil & Lin, Kun-Yi Andrew & Varjani, Sunita & Connelly, Stephanie & You, Siming, 2023. "A review of high-solid anaerobic digestion (HSAD): From transport phenomena to process design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zhongzhong & Hu, Yuansheng & Wang, Shun & Wu, Guangxue & Zhan, Xinmin, 2023. "A critical review on dry anaerobic digestion of organic waste: Characteristics, operational conditions, and improvement strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Zhang, Jingxin & Hu, Qiang & Qu, Yiyuan & Dai, Yanjun & He, Yiliang & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Tong, Yen Wah, 2020. "Integrating food waste sorting system with anaerobic digestion and gasification for hydrogen and methane co-production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    3. Ganzoury, Mohamed A. & Allam, Nageh K., 2015. "Impact of nanotechnology on biogas production: A mini-review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1392-1404.
    4. Matheri, Anthony Njuguna & Sethunya, Vuiswa Lucia & Belaid, Mohamed & Muzenda, Edison, 2018. "Analysis of the biogas productivity from dry anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2328-2334.
    5. Fernandes, Daniel J. & Ferreira, Ana F. & Fernandes, Edgar C., 2023. "Biogas and biomethane production potential via anaerobic digestion of manure: A case study of Portugal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Zamri, M.F.M.A. & Hasmady, Saiful & Akhiar, Afifi & Ideris, Fazril & Shamsuddin, A.H. & Mofijur, M. & Fattah, I. M. Rizwanul & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Ding, Lingkan & Wang, Yuchuan & Lin, Hongjian & van Lierop, Leif & Hu, Bo, 2022. "Facilitating solid-state anaerobic digestion of food waste via bio-electrochemical treatment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    8. Zhang, Jingxin & Loh, Kai-Chee & Li, Wangliang & Lim, Jun Wei & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2017. "Three-stage anaerobic digester for food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 287-295.
    9. Rouches, E. & Herpoël-Gimbert, I. & Steyer, J.P. & Carrere, H., 2016. "Improvement of anaerobic degradation by white-rot fungi pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 179-198.
    10. Meneses-Quelal Orlando & Velázquez-Martí Borja, 2020. "Pretreatment of Animal Manure Biomass to Improve Biogas Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    11. Dixit, Mandeep & Gupta, Guddu Kumar & Usmani, Zeba & Sharma, Minaxi & Shukla, Pratyoosh, 2021. "Enhanced bioremediation of pulp effluents through improved enzymatic treatment strategies: A greener approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Yang, Shunchang & Liu, Yikan & Wu, Na & Zhang, Yingxiu & Svoronos, Spyros & Pullammanappallil, Pratap, 2019. "Low-cost, Arduino-based, portable device for measurement of methane composition in biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 224-229.
    13. Barua, Visva Bharati & Goud, Vaibhav V. & Kalamdhad, Ajay S., 2018. "Microbial pretreatment of water hyacinth for enhanced hydrolysis followed by biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 21-29.
    14. Arshad, Muhammad & Bano, Ijaz & Khan, Nasrullah & Shahzad, Mirza Imran & Younus, Muhammad & Abbas, Mazhar & Iqbal, Munawar, 2018. "Electricity generation from biogas of poultry waste: An assessment of potential and feasibility in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1241-1246.
    15. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Song, Yapeng & Hu, Wanrong & Qiao, Wei & Westerholm, Maria & Wandera, Simon M. & Dong, Renjie, 2022. "Upgrading the performance of high solids feeding anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under extremely high ammonia level," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 13-20.
    17. Capson-Tojo, G. & Moscoviz, R. & Astals, S. & Robles, Á. & Steyer, J.-P., 2020. "Unraveling the literature chaos around free ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    18. Zhang, Jingxin & Li, Wangliang & Lee, Jonathan & Loh, Kai-Chee & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2017. "Enhancement of biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge by biological co-pretreatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 479-486.
    19. Lourenço, Vitor Alves & Nadaleti, Willian Cézar & Vieira, Bruno Müller & Chua, Hui, 2021. "Methane production test of the anaerobic sludge from rice parboiling industries with the addition of biodiesel glycerol from rice bran oil in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    20. Nicole Meinusch & Susanne Kramer & Oliver Körner & Jürgen Wiese & Ingolf Seick & Anita Beblek & Regine Berges & Bernhard Illenberger & Marco Illenberger & Jennifer Uebbing & Maximilian Wolf & Gunter S, 2021. "Integrated Cycles for Urban Biomass as a Strategy to Promote a CO 2 -Neutral Society—A Feasibility Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:167:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122006426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.