IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v163y2021icp2198-2207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kinetic studies of alkaline-pretreated corn stover co-digested with upset dairy manure under solid-state

Author

Listed:
  • Ajayi-Banji, A.A.
  • Sunoj, S.
  • Igathinathane, C.
  • Rahman, S.

Abstract

Prolonged lag phase and reactor instability make methane yield description and prediction challenging in upset solid-state anaerobic digestion (SSAD). Seven kinetic models (first-order (FOM), modified first-order (MFOM), Fitzhugh (FzM), logistic (LM), modified logistic (MLM), Cone (CM), and modified Gompertz (MGM) were employed for treatment evaluation. The treatments were dairy manure blended with calcium pretreated stover (8% Ca CSDM) or sodium pretreated corn stover (4% Na CSDM) or 2% aqueous ammonia pretreated corn stover (2% NH4 CSDM), or 4% aqueous ammonia pretreated corn stover (4% NH4 CSDM). The LM, CM, MLM with MGM, and MGM best described methane yield for 4% Na CSDM, 2% NH4 CSDM, 4% NH4 CSDM, and 8% Ca CSDM, respectively. Optimal hydraulic retention time predicted for the least inhibited treatment, 8% Ca CSDM, was 60 days. Therefore, non-hydrolysis rate limiting models (LM, MLM, FzM, MGM, and CM) could simulate methane yield, design of reactor’s volume, and develop degradation rate models in full-scale SSAD.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajayi-Banji, A.A. & Sunoj, S. & Igathinathane, C. & Rahman, S., 2021. "Kinetic studies of alkaline-pretreated corn stover co-digested with upset dairy manure under solid-state," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 2198-2207.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:163:y:2021:i:c:p:2198-2207
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120316761
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mao, Chunlan & Xi, Jianchao & Feng, Yongzhong & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin, 2019. "Biogas production and synergistic correlations of systematic parameters during batch anaerobic digestion of corn straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1271-1279.
    2. Ehimen, E.A. & Sun, Z.F. & Carrington, C.G. & Birch, E.J. & Eaton-Rye, J.J., 2011. "Anaerobic digestion of microalgae residues resulting from the biodiesel production process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(10), pages 3454-3463.
    3. Nam, Hyungseok & Maglinao, Amado L. & Capareda, Sergio C. & Rodriguez-Alejandro, David Aaron, 2016. "Enriched-air fluidized bed gasification using bench and pilot scale reactors of dairy manure with sand bedding based on response surface methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 187-199.
    4. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Kobayashi, Takuro & Li, Yu-You & Xu, Kaiqin & Zhao, Youcai, 2015. "Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and Egeria densa: Performance assessment and kinetic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 78-86.
    5. Syaichurrozi, Iqbal, 2018. "Biogas production from co-digestion Salvinia molesta and rice straw and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 76-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ajayi-Banji, A. & Rahman, S., 2022. "A review of process parameters influence in solid-state anaerobic digestion: Focus on performance stability thresholds," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Bao, Rui & Wei, Yufang & Guan, Ruolin & Li, Xiujin & Lu, Xuebin & Rong, Siyuan & Zuo, Xiaoyu & Yuan, Hairong, 2023. "High-solids anaerobic co-digestion performances and microbial community dynamics in co-digestion of different mixing ratios with food waste and highland barley straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarto, Sarto & Hildayati, Raudati & Syaichurrozi, Iqbal, 2019. "Effect of chemical pretreatment using sulfuric acid on biogas production from water hyacinth and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 335-350.
    2. Qi, Chuanren & Cao, Dingge & Gao, Xingzu & Jia, Sumeng & Yin, Rongrong & Nghiem, Long D. & Li, Guoxue & Luo, Wenhai, 2023. "Optimising organic composition of feedstock to improve microbial dynamics and symbiosis to advance solid-state anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    3. Foteini Sakaveli & Maria Petala & Vasilios Tsiridis & Efthymios Darakas, 2024. "Enhancing Methane Yield in Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Primary Sewage Sludge: A Comprehensive Review on Potential Additives and Strategies," Waste, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Lim, Juin Yau & Teng, Sin Yong & How, Bing Shen & Nam, KiJeon & Heo, SungKu & Máša, Vítězslav & Stehlík, Petr & Yoo, Chang Kyoo, 2022. "From microalgae to bioenergy: Identifying optimally integrated biorefinery pathways and harvest scheduling under uncertainties in predicted climate," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Syaichurrozi, Iqbal & Basyir, M. Fakhri & Farraz, Rafi Muhammad & Rusdi, Rusdi, 2020. "A preliminary study: Effect of initial pH and Saccharomyces cerevisiae addition on biogas production from acid-pretreated Salvinia molesta and kinetics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    6. Luo, Tao & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Pan, Junting & Ge, Yihong & Mei, Zili & Xue, Jian & Fu, Yanran & Liu, Hongbin, 2020. "How exothermic characteristics of rice straw during anaerobic digestion affects net energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Gao, Shumei & Hu, Changwei & Sun, Shiqing & Xu, Jie & Zhao, Yongjun & Zhang, Hui, 2018. "Performance of piggery wastewater treatment and biogas upgrading by three microalgal cultivation technologies under different initial COD concentration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 360-369.
    8. Rodriguez-Alejandro, David A. & Nam, Hyungseok & Maglinao, Amado L. & Capareda, Sergio C. & Aguilera-Alvarado, Alberto F., 2016. "Development of a modified equilibrium model for biomass pilot-scale fluidized bed gasifier performance predictions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1092-1108.
    9. Prajapati, Sanjeev Kumar & Malik, Anushree & Vijay, Virendra Kumar, 2014. "Comparative evaluation of biomass production and bioenergy generation potential of Chlorella spp. through anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 790-797.
    10. Vadim Burko & Alvydas Zagorskis & Nelli Elistratova & Olha Khliestova & Jaunius Urbonavičius & Vladimir Monin, 2024. "Assessment of the Seasonal Potential of Macroalgae and Grass in the Sea of Azov for Methanogenesis and Optimization of the Digestate’s Carbon/Nitrogen Ratio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Neves, Viviane T. de C. & Sales, Emerson Andrade & Perelo, Louisa W., 2016. "Influence of lipid extraction methods as pre-treatment of microalgal biomass for biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 160-165.
    12. Yin, Yao & Liu, Ya-Juan & Meng, Shu-Juan & Kiran, Esra Uçkun & Liu, Yu, 2016. "Enzymatic pretreatment of activated sludge, food waste and their mixture for enhanced bioenergy recovery and waste volume reduction via anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1131-1137.
    13. Zhang, Jingxin & Kan, Xiang & Shen, Ye & Loh, Kai-Chee & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2018. "A hybrid biological and thermal waste-to-energy system with heat energy recovery and utilization for solid organic waste treatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 214-222.
    14. Capson-Tojo, Gabriel & Torres, Alvaro & Muñoz, Raúl & Bartacek, Jan & Jeison, David, 2017. "Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of lipid-extracted microalgae N. gaditana for methane production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 539-546.
    15. Shah, Fayyaz Ali & Mahmood, Qaisar & Rashid, Naim & Pervez, Arshid & Raja, Iftikhar Ahmad & Shah, Mohammad Maroof, 2015. "Co-digestion, pretreatment and digester design for enhanced methanogenesis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 627-642.
    16. Siwen Zhang & Haiming Gu & Jing Qian & Wioletta Raróg-Pilecka & Yuan Wang & Qijing Wu & Hao Zhao, 2023. "Techno-Economic Assessment of High-Safety and Cost-Effective Syngas Produced by O 2 -Enriched Air Gasification with 40–70% O 2 Purity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    17. Xiao, Benyi & Chen, Xia & Han, Yunping & Liu, Junxin & Guo, Xuesong, 2018. "Bioelectrochemical enhancement of the anaerobic digestion of thermal-alkaline pretreated sludge in microbial electrolysis cells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1177-1183.
    18. Damaceno, Felippe Martins & Chiarelotto, Maico & Pires Salcedo Restrepo, Juan C. & Buligon, Eduardo Luiz & Costa, Luiz Antonio de Mendonça & de Lucas Junior, Jorge & Costa, Mônica Sarolli Silva de Men, 2019. "Anaerobic co-digestion of sludge cake from poultry slaughtering wastewater treatment and sweet potato: Energy and nutrient recovery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 489-499.
    19. Singh, Neeraj Kumar & Kumari, Priyanka & Singh, Rajesh, 2021. "Intensified hydrogen yield using hydrogenase rich sulfate-reducing bacteria in bio-electrochemical system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    20. Montingelli, M.E. & Benyounis, K.Y. & Quilty, B. & Stokes, J. & Olabi, A.G., 2017. "Influence of mechanical pretreatment and organic concentration of Irish brown seaweed for methane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1079-1089.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:163:y:2021:i:c:p:2198-2207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.