Author
Listed:
- Francesco Pelella
(Department of Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Napoli–Federico II, P.le Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy)
- Adelso Flaviano Passarelli
(Department of Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Napoli–Federico II, P.le Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy)
- Belén Llopis-Mengual
(Instituto Universitario de Investigación de Ingeniería Energética (IUIIE), Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)
- Luca Viscito
(Department of Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Napoli–Federico II, P.le Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy)
- Emilio Navarro-Peris
(Instituto Universitario de Investigación de Ingeniería Energética (IUIIE), Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)
- Alfonso William Mauro
(Department of Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Napoli–Federico II, P.le Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy)
Abstract
The European Union’s 2050 targets for decarbonization and electrification are promoting the widespread integration of heat pumps for space heating, cooling, and domestic hot water in buildings. However, their energy and environmental performance can be significantly compromised by soft faults, such as refrigerant leakage or heat exchanger fouling, which may reduce system efficiency by up to 25%, even with maintenance intervals every two years. As a result, the implementation of self-fault detection, diagnosis, and evaluation (FDDE) tools based on operational data has become increasingly important. The complexity and added value of these tools grow as they progress from simple fault detection to quantitative fault evaluation, enabling more accurate and timely maintenance strategies. Direct fault measurements are often unfeasible due to spatial, economic, or intrusiveness constraints, thus requiring indirect methods based on low-cost and accessible measurements. In such cases, overlapping fault symptoms may create diagnostic ambiguities. Moreover, the accuracy of FDDE approaches depends on the type and number of sensors deployed, which must be balanced against cost considerations. This paper provides a comprehensive review of current FDDE methodologies for heat pumps, drawing insights from the academic literature, patent databases, and commercial products. Finally, the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing fault evaluation capabilities is discussed, along with emerging challenges and future research directions.
Suggested Citation
Francesco Pelella & Adelso Flaviano Passarelli & Belén Llopis-Mengual & Luca Viscito & Emilio Navarro-Peris & Alfonso William Mauro, 2025.
"State-of-the-Art Methodologies for Self-Fault Detection, Diagnosis and Evaluation (FDDE) in Residential Heat Pumps,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-22, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3286-:d:1685605
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3286-:d:1685605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.