IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i13p3272-d1685275.html

Case Study of a Greenfield Blue Hydrogen Plant: A Comparative Analysis of Production Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Sajjadi

    (Clean Energy Technologies Research Institute (CETRI), Process Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

  • Hussameldin Ibrahim

    (Clean Energy Technologies Research Institute (CETRI), Process Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

Abstract

Blue hydrogen is a key pathway for reducing greenhouse gas emissions while utilizing natural gas with carbon capture and storage (CCS). This study conducts a techno-economic and environmental analysis of a greenfield blue hydrogen plant in Saskatchewan, Canada, integrating both SMR and ATR technologies. Unlike previous studies that focus mainly on production units, this research includes all process and utility systems such as H 2 and CO 2 compression, air separation, refrigeration, co-generation, and gas dehydration. Aspen HYSYS simulations revealed ATR’s energy demand is 10% lower than that of SMR. The hydrogen production cost was USD 3.28/kg for ATR and USD 3.33/kg for SMR, while a separate study estimated a USD 2.2/kg cost for design without utilities, highlighting the impact of indirect costs. Environmental analysis showed ATR’s lower Global Warming Potential (GWP) compared to SMR, reducing its carbon footprint. The results signified the role of utility integration, site conditions, and process selection in optimizing energy efficiency, costs, and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Sajjadi & Hussameldin Ibrahim, 2025. "Case Study of a Greenfield Blue Hydrogen Plant: A Comparative Analysis of Production Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3272-:d:1685275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3272/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3272/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riemer, Matia & Duscha, Vicki, 2023. "Carbon capture in blue hydrogen production is not where it is supposed to be - Evaluating the gap between practical experience and literature estimates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    2. Jacek Majorowicz & Stephen E. Grasby, 2021. "Deep Geothermal Heating Potential for the Communities of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-37, January.
    3. Malcolm T. McCulloch & Amos Winter & Clark E. Sherman & Julie A. Trotter, 2024. "300 years of sclerosponge thermometry shows global warming has exceeded 1.5 °C," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(2), pages 171-177, February.
    4. Kim, Jaden & Jaumotte, Florence & Panton, Augustus J. & Schwerhoff, Gregor, 2025. "Energy security and the green transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Szymon Pawlak & Agnieszka Fornalczyk, 2025. "Analysis of the Efficiency of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle (HFCV) Applications in Manufacturing Processes Using Computer Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan, Haiming & Han, Di & Khursheed, Muhammad Aqib, 2025. "Does green finance improve energy security in Chinese Provinces? Evidence from machine learning approaches," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    2. Long, Yaomei & Li, Songyuan & Liu, Guannan & Shen, Lin & Liao, Zhenyang & Lv, Yuan & Zhong, Yong & Li, Yun, 2025. "Effects of hydraulic oil viscosity on the operational performance of ultra-high-pressure hydrogen diaphragm compressors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(C).
    3. Yunheng Zhou & Weizhen Wang & Yiming Chen & Jiaai Tian & Kevin Tu, 2025. "Evaluating Eurasian countries’ global energy governance: a framework for analysis," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 193-208, September.
    4. Jie Yan & Hailing Wang, 2025. "Does the Development of Digital Finance Enhance Urban Energy Resilience? Evidence from Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-25, July.
    5. Jarosław Brodny & Magdalena Tutak & Wieslaw Wes Grebski, 2025. "Multi-Barrier Framework for Assessing Energy Security in European Union Member States (MBEES Approach)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-41, September.
    6. Ali, Mohammed & Evans, Steve, 2025. "The impact of best practice on energy efficiency in industrial decarbonization policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    7. Jean Chateau & Hugo Rojas-Romagosa & Sneha D Thube & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2025. "IMF-ENV: Integrating Climate, Energy, and Trade Policies in a General Equilibrium Framework," IMF Working Papers 2025/077, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2025. "How does green credit effectively promote green technology innovation?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Fan, Yi & Chang, Tsangyao & Ranjbar, Omid, 2024. "Energy security and energy mix diversification nexus in the OECD countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 2071-2085.
    10. Mohamed Sami Ben Ali & Alanoud Al‐Maadid & Brahim Bergougui, 2026. "Climate Change and Energy Security Risk: Do Green Patents, Institutional Quality, and Human Capital Make a Difference?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 165-189, February.
    11. Li, Jingcheng & Li, Menggang & Li, Junjie, 2025. "Quotas in flux, security at risk: China's energy quota trading and the DML-estimated energy security degradation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    12. Hu, Xiaoxiao & Zhang, Weiqiang & Zhang, Shengling & Hao, Yu & Cong, Jianhui, 2025. "The impacts of the global energy transition on China's energy security in the long-term: Heterogeneous evidence from the supply and consumption sides," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    13. Gong, Binbin & Yang, Ning & Liu, Wenming, 2025. "How does the modernization of agriculture promote manufacturing firms' green transition?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    14. Al Mamun, Md & Boubaker, Sabri & Hassan, Md Zakir & Manita, Riadh, 2025. "Towards net zero: Implications of environmental regulations on green finance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Shittu, Ibrahim & Saqib, Abdul & Tang, Chor Foon & Chen, You, 2025. "Does global geopolitical risk jeopardize the clean energy transition? New evidence from a global panel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    16. R.V., Rohit & R., Vipin Raj & Kiplangat, Dennis C. & R., Veena & Jose, Rajan & Pradeepkumar, A.P. & Kumar, K. Satheesh, 2023. "Tracing the evolution and charting the future of geothermal energy research and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Beaufils, Timothé & Conyngham, Killian & de Vries, Marlene & Jakob, Michael & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Richter, Philipp M. & Spiro, Daniel & Stern, Lennart & Wanner, Joschka, 2025. "The geopolitical externality of climate policy," Kiel Working Papers 2283, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    18. Zhiyong Zhang & Xiaokai Liu & Rula Sa & Meng Wang & Xianli Liu & Peiji Hu & Zhen Gao & Peixue Xing & Yan Zhao & Yong Geng, 2025. "The Impact of Climate Risk on China’s Energy Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Van Vyve, Mathieu, 2024. "Identifying when thresholds from the Paris Agreement are breached : the minmax average, a novel smoothing approach," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2024004, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    20. Stefano Mazzoli, 2022. "Geothermal Energy and Structural Geology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-3, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3272-:d:1685275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.