IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i8p1779-d1372319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SDEWES 2023: Barriers and Possibilities for the Development of Short-Rotation Coppice as an Agroforestry System for Adaptation to Climate Change in Central European Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Weger

    (Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Publ. Res. Inst., Květnové nám. 391, 25243 Průhonice, Czech Republic)

  • Kamila Vávrová

    (Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Publ. Res. Inst., Květnové nám. 391, 25243 Průhonice, Czech Republic)

  • Lukáš Janota

    (Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Publ. Res. Inst., Květnové nám. 391, 25243 Průhonice, Czech Republic)

  • Jaroslav Knápek

    (Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Publ. Res. Inst., Květnové nám. 391, 25243 Průhonice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This article compares different production, economic, and selected environmental aspects of agroforestry systems in a standard (alley cropping) and a newly proposed design with fast-growing trees grown in short-rotation coppice. Our models of agroforestry systems (AFSs) are as follows: (i) alley cropping AFS with cherry and walnut trees in single rows (tree strips) with 28 m-wide arable fields between them (crop strips), and (ii) coppiced tree belt AFS with poplars and willows and 25 m-wide arable fields between them (crop strips). To evaluate the production characteristics of trees, we used yield curves from experimental plantations in conditions of the Czech Republic from previous research projects. Cost data were collected from long-term experimental plantations and combined with current operation and energy prices. The article presents an economic methodology for assessing the competitiveness of biomass production in AFSs under the current identified market conditions. Our results show that AFSs with short-rotation coppice can have similar economic and production results as annual crops if grown on suitable sites and with appropriate quality of agronomy. In comparison, alley cropping AFSs with fruit trees would not be economically viable for farmers without a significant subsidy for establishment and maintenance in the first years after establishment. Concerning the latest economic and political developments, the product from SRC (energy woodchips) can be evaluated as strategic, increasing the producer’s independence from purchased energy fuels.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Weger & Kamila Vávrová & Lukáš Janota & Jaroslav Knápek, 2024. "SDEWES 2023: Barriers and Possibilities for the Development of Short-Rotation Coppice as an Agroforestry System for Adaptation to Climate Change in Central European Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1779-:d:1372319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1779/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1779/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sherrington, Chris & Moran, Dominic, 2010. "Modelling farmer uptake of perennial energy crops in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3567-3578, July.
    2. Vávrová, Kamila & Knápek, Jaroslav & Weger, Jan & Králík, Tomáš & Beranovský, Jiří, 2018. "Model for evaluation of locally available biomass competitiveness for decentralized space heating in villages and small towns," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 853-865.
    3. Dmuchowski, Wojciech & Baczewska-Dąbrowska, Aneta H. & Gworek, Barbara, 2024. "The role of temperate agroforestry in mitigating climate change: A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Venn, Rosemary & Burbi, Sara, 2023. "Agroforestry policy development in England: a question of knowledge transference," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tranter, R.B. & Swinbank, A. & Jones, P.J. & Banks, C.J. & Salter, A.M., 2011. "Assessing the potential for the uptake of on-farm anaerobic digestion for energy production in England," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2424-2430, May.
    2. Evgeny Chupakhin & Olga Babich & Stanislav Sukhikh & Svetlana Ivanova & Ekaterina Budenkova & Olga Kalashnikova & Olga Kriger, 2021. "Methods of Increasing Miscanthus Biomass Yield for Biofuel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-30, December.
    3. Ge, Jiaqi & Sutherland, Lee-Ann & Polhill, J. Gary & Matthews, Keith & Miller, Dave & Wardell-Johnson, Douglas, 2017. "Exploring factors affecting on-farm renewable energy adoption in Scotland using large-scale microdata," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 548-560.
    4. Július Bemš & Caner Aydin, 2022. "Introduction to weather derivatives," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), May.
    5. Alexander, Peter & Moran, Dominic, 2013. "Impact of perennial energy crops income variability on the crop selection of risk averse farmers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 587-596.
    6. Elsadig Omer & Dora Szlatenyi & Sándor Csenki & Jomana Alrwashdeh & Ivan Czako & Vince Láng, 2024. "Farming Practice Variability and Its Implications for Soil Health in Agriculture: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-27, November.
    7. Tate, Graham & Mbzibain, Aurelian & Ali, Shaukat, 2012. "A comparison of the drivers influencing farmers' adoption of enterprises associated with renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 400-409.
    8. Adams, P.W.R. & Lindegaard, K., 2016. "A critical appraisal of the effectiveness of UK perennial energy crops policy since 1990," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 188-202.
    9. Knápek, J. & Starý, O. & Vávrová, K. & Bemš, J. & Weger, J. & Horák, M., 2024. "Modelling the impact of business risk on the competitiveness of purpose-grown biomass of annual and perennial crops," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. Vaibhav Pradip Chaudhary & Bhim Bahadur Ghaley, 2025. "Insights into Beneficial Effects of an Agroforestry System on Soil Properties and Crop Yields: A Case Study from the Experimental Farm at University of Copenhagen, Denmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    11. P. Mathiou & Stelios Rozakis & Rafal Pudelko & A. Faber & A. Petsakos, 2014. "Utility maximising supply response: the case of perennial biomass plantations in Poland," Working Papers 2014-3, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    12. Ben Fradj, Nosra & Jayet, Pierre Alain & Rozakis, Stelios & Georganta, Eleni & Jędrejek, Anna, 2020. "Contribution of agricultural systems to the bioeconomy in Poland: Integration of willow in the context of a stylised CAP diversification," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Liu, Liansheng & Wang, Dongji & Gao, Liwei & Duan, Runze, 2020. "Distributed heating/centralized monitoring mode of biomass briquette fuel in Chinese northern rural areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1221-1230.
    14. Helliwell, Richard, 2018. "Where did the marginal land go? Farmers perspectives on marginal land and its implications for adoption of dedicated energy crops," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 166-172.
    15. Knápek, J. & Králík, T. & Vávrová, K. & Valentová, M. & Horák, M. & Outrata, D., 2021. "Policy implications of competition between conventional and energy crops," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    16. Wang, Zhanwu & Wang, Zhenfeng & Tahir, Nadeem & Wang, Heng & Li, Jin & Xu, Guangyin, 2020. "Study of synergetic development in straw power supply chain: Straw price and government subsidy as incentive," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    17. Jan Weger & Jaroslav Knápek & Jaroslav Bubeník & Kamila Vávrová & Zdeněk Strašil, 2021. "Can Miscanthus Fulfill Its Expectations as an Energy Biomass Source in the Current Conditions of the Czech Republic?—Potentials and Barriers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Glithero, N. J. & Ramsden, S. J. & Wilson, P., 2013. "Potential for Second Generation Biofuel Feedstock from English Arable Farms," 87th Annual Conference, April 8-10, 2013, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 158858, Agricultural Economics Society.
    19. Glithero, N.J. & Wilson, P. & Ramsden, S.J., 2015. "Optimal combinable and dedicated energy crop scenarios for marginal land," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 82-91.
    20. Zhu, Tong & Curtis, John & Clancy, Matthew, 2019. "Promoting agricultural biogas and biomethane production: Lessons from cross-country studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1779-:d:1372319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.