IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v134y2023ics0264837723004027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agroforestry policy development in England: a question of knowledge transference

Author

Listed:
  • Venn, Rosemary
  • Burbi, Sara

Abstract

Agroecology as a concept for reimagining food systems has grown in popularity and is now used in several food and agriculture policy frameworks around the world. While there is a significant body of research around agroecology, its origins, applications, and as a much-needed transition pathway to sustainable food systems, there is limited understanding on how agroecology may be situated within policy frameworks and how agroecological knowledge may be used to inform decision-making. In England, as the Government’s post-Brexit subsidy scheme – the Environmental Land Management Scheme (ELMs) – is developed, various sectoral actors are employing different frameworks in attempts to deliver multiple objectives around land use, food, agriculture and biodiversity. This paper reviews 3 influential frameworks (Sustainable Development Goals, Ecosystem Services, FAO’s 10 Principles of Agroecology) and assesses the degree to which they contribute to the development of agroecologically-oriented policy in England. With a specific focus on agroforestry as an exemplar agroecological approach, this paper contributes to the limited policy literature on agroecology. Using thematic and content analysis, nine policy documents pertaining to agroforestry were reviewed, resulting in a ‘degree of embeddedness’ being assigned to each framework. Results showed that all three frameworks had a low degree of embeddedness in policy; in other words, none of the frameworks considered have been coherently integrated into current policy documents. With such urgency to halt environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, climate breakdown and food insecurity, the apparent lack of knowledge transfer within critical policy documents is noteworthy. This paper concludes with a set of broad policy recommendations, applicable at both the EU and national level, alongside a set of recommendations specifically for agroforestry policy development in England.

Suggested Citation

  • Venn, Rosemary & Burbi, Sara, 2023. "Agroforestry policy development in England: a question of knowledge transference," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:134:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723004027
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723004027
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Westaway, Sally & Grange, Ian & Smith, Jo & Smith, Laurence G., 2023. "Meeting tree planting targets on the UK's path to net-zero: A review of lessons learnt from 100 years of land use policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    2. Luke Owen & Donna Udall & Alex Franklin & Moya Kneafsey, 2020. "Place-Based Pathways to Sustainability: Exploring Alignment between Geographical Indications and the Concept of Agroecology Territories in Wales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Colin Ray Anderson & Janneke Bruil & Michael Jahi Chappell & Csilla Kiss & Michel Patrick Pimbert, 2019. "From Transition to Domains of Transformation: Getting to Sustainable and Just Food Systems through Agroecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Giuseppe Gargano & Francesco Licciardo & Milena Verrascina & Barbara Zanetti, 2021. "The Agroecological Approach as a Model for Multifunctional Agriculture and Farming towards the European Green Deal 2030—Some Evidence from the Italian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faustine Ruggieri & Cécile Coulon-Leroy & Armelle Mazé, 2023. "How Can Collective Action Support the Agroecological Transition in Geographical Indication Vineyards? Insights from the Loire Valley Wine Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Marcelo Sili & María Isabel Haag & María Belén Nieto, 2022. "Constructing the Transitions and Co-Existence of Rural Development Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Dalal Aassouli & Ayodele Akande & Ray Jureidini, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Food Governance and the Alignment of Food Security Policies to Sustainable Development: A Case Study of OIC Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Feng Zhou & Chunhui Wen, 2023. "Research on the Level of Agricultural Green Development, Regional Disparities, and Dynamic Distribution Evolution in China from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-47, July.
    5. Morgane Millet & Valerie Keast & Stefano Gonano & François Casabianca, 2020. "Product Qualification as a Means of Identifying Sustainability Pathways for Place-Based Agri-Food Systems: The Case of the GI Corsican Grapefruit (France)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Luke Owen & Donna Udall & Alex Franklin & Moya Kneafsey, 2020. "Place-Based Pathways to Sustainability: Exploring Alignment between Geographical Indications and the Concept of Agroecology Territories in Wales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Emilie Vandecandelaere & Luis Fernando Samper & Andrés Rey & Ana Daza & Pablo Mejía & Florence Tartanac & Massimo Vittori, 2021. "The Geographical Indication Pathway to Sustainability: A Framework to Assess and Monitor the Contributions of Geographical Indications to Sustainability through a Participatory Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Abiodun Olusola Omotayo & Peter Tshepiso Ndhlovu & Seleke Christopher Tshwene & Kehinde Oluseyi Olagunju & Adeyemi Oladapo Aremu, 2021. "Determinants of Household Income and Willingness to Pay for Indigenous Plants in North West Province, South Africa: A Two-Stage Heckman Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Nathan Einbinder & Helda Morales & Mateo Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho & Bruce G. Ferguson & Miriam Aldasoro & Ronald Nigh, 2022. "Agroecology from the ground up: a critical analysis of sustainable soil management in the highlands of Guatemala," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 979-996, September.
    10. Nawab Khan & Ram L. Ray & Hazem S. Kassem & Sajjad Hussain & Shemei Zhang & Muhammad Khayyam & Muhammad Ihtisham & Simplice A. Asongu, 2021. "Potential Role of Technology Innovation in Transformation of Sustainable Food Systems: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Colleen Hammelman & Elizabeth Shoffner & Maria Cruzat & Samantha Lee, 2022. "Assembling agroecological socio-natures: a political ecology analysis of urban and peri-urban agriculture in Rosario, Argentina," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 371-383, March.
    12. Daniel López-García & Gabriela Vázquez-Macías & Javier García-Fernández & Maggie Schmitt & Paula Ortega-Faura & Josep Lluís Espluga-Trenc, 2023. "Towards a Politics of Recognition: Exploring the Symbolic Contexts of Material Agroecological Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Roland Ebel, 2020. "Are Small Farms Sustainable by Nature?—Review of an Ongoing Misunderstanding in Agroecology," Challenges in Sustainability, Librello publishing house, vol. 8(1), pages 17-29.
    14. Punam Behl & Henny Osbahr & Sarah Cardey, 2023. "New Possibilities for Women’s Empowerment through Agroecology in Himachal Pradesh, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Yasutaka Ozaki & Rajib Shaw, 2022. "Citizens’ Social Participation to Implement Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Spörri, Martina, 2023. "Farmers' perceptions and perspectives in regard to agricultural policy making in Switzerland," 97th Annual Conference, March 27-29, 2023, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 334514, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    17. Tarsiguel, Laura & Dorey, Elodie & Dorel, Marc & Andrieu, Nadine, 2023. "Alternative practices to pesticide use in the Guadeloupe banana belt: Do biophysical constraints limit agroecological transitions?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    18. Rodolfo Sapiains & Gabriela Azócar & Pilar Moraga & Catalina Valenzuela & Paulina Aldunce & Camilo Cornejo & Maisa Rojas & Antonio Pulgar & Loreto Medina & Deniz Bozkurt, 2022. "Are Citizens Ready for Active Climate Engagement or Stuck in a Game of Blame? Local Perceptions of Climate Action and Citizen Participation in Chilean Patagonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Sébastien Boillat & Raphaël Belmin & Patrick Bottazzi, 2022. "The agroecological transition in Senegal: transnational links and uneven empowerment," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 281-300, March.
    20. Plateau, Lou & Roudart, Laurence & Hudon, Marek & Maréchal, Kevin, 2021. "Opening the organisational black box to grasp the difficulties of agroecological transition. An empirical analysis of tensions in agroecological production cooperatives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:134:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723004027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.