IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i5p1031-d1343850.html

A Theoretical Study on the Thermal Performance of an Increasing Pressure Endothermic Cycle for Geothermal Power Generation

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Yu

    (Department of Energy and Power Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Xinli Lu

    (Department of Energy and Power Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Wei Zhang

    (Department of Energy and Power Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Jiali Liu

    (Department of Energy and Power Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

Abstract

In this study, a power cycle (IPEC), with an increasing pressure endothermic process in a downhole heat exchanger (DHE) and a CO 2 -based working fluid mixture, was developed for geothermal power generation. The increasing pressure endothermic process, which cannot be achieved in a conventional evaporator on the ground, was realized using the gravitational potential energy in the DHE. The parameters of the power cycle and the structural size of the DHE were optimized simultaneously. Using CO 2 -R32 as the working fluid of the IPEC provides the highest net power output. The net power generated with the IPEC was compared with a single-flash (SF) system, a trans-critical CO 2 (t-CO 2 ) system, and an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) under the same heat source and sink conditions. Six selection maps were generated for choosing the optimum power cycle for electricity production, in which four power generation systems (ORC, t-CO 2 , IPEC, and SF) were included, and two DHE diameters (0.155 m and 0.22 m) were investigated. It was found that the IPEC system had more net power output than the other three systems (ORC, t-CO 2 , and SF) under the conditions that the geofluid’s mass flow rate was less than 10 kg/s and its temperature was lower than 180 °C.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Yu & Xinli Lu & Wei Zhang & Jiali Liu, 2024. "A Theoretical Study on the Thermal Performance of an Increasing Pressure Endothermic Cycle for Geothermal Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:1031-:d:1343850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1031/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1031/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xia, Jiaxi & Wang, Jiangfeng & Zhou, Kehan & Zhao, Pan & Dai, Yiping, 2018. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel transcritical CO2 Rankine cycle with an ejector driven by low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 337-351.
    2. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    3. Bu, Xianbiao & Ma, Weibin & Li, Huashan, 2012. "Geothermal energy production utilizing abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 80-85.
    4. Chys, M. & van den Broek, M. & Vanslambrouck, B. & De Paepe, M., 2012. "Potential of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 623-632.
    5. Collings, Peter & Yu, Zhibin & Wang, Enhua, 2016. "A dynamic organic Rankine cycle using a zeotropic mixture as the working fluid with composition tuning to match changing ambient conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-591.
    6. Sánchez, Carlos J.N. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2018. "Technical and environmental analysis of transcritical Rankine cycles operating with numerous CO2 mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 180-190.
    7. Luo, Chao & Huang, Lichang & Gong, Yulie & Ma, Weibin, 2012. "Thermodynamic comparison of different types of geothermal power plant systems and case studies in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 155-160.
    8. Lu, Xinli & Zhao, Yangyang & Zhu, Jialing & Zhang, Wei, 2018. "Optimization and applicability of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 128-141.
    9. Shaopeng Huang, 2012. "Geothermal energy in China," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(8), pages 557-560, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alvin Kiprono Bett & Saeid Jalilinasrabady, 2021. "Optimization of ORC Power Plants for Geothermal Application in Kenya by Combining Exergy and Pinch Point Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Sun, Xiaocun & Shi, Lingfeng & Tian, Hua & Wang, Xuan & Zhang, Yonghao & Yao, Yu & Sun, Rui & Shu, Gequn, 2022. "Analysis of an ideal composition tunable combined cooling and power cycle with CO2-based mixture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Huster, Wolfgang R. & Schweidtmann, Artur M. & Mitsos, Alexander, 2020. "Globally optimal working fluid mixture composition for geothermal power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    4. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    5. Chen, Ying & Liu, Yuxuan & Nam, Eun-Young & Zhang, Yang & Dahlak, Aida, 2023. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of an integrated double-flash-binary geothermal system and dual-pressure ORC using zeotropic mixtures; multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    6. Magdalena Santos-Rodriguez, M. & Flores-Tlacuahuac, Antonio & Zavala, Victor M., 2017. "A stochastic optimization approach for the design of organic fluid mixtures for low-temperature heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 145-159.
    7. Yang, Fubin & Cho, Heejin & Zhang, Hongguang & Zhang, Jian, 2017. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for CNG engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1100-1118.
    8. Zhang, Yuan & Liang, Tianyang & Yang, Ke, 2022. "An integrated energy storage system consisting of Compressed Carbon dioxide energy storage and Organic Rankine Cycle: Exergoeconomic evaluation and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    9. Wang, Yongzhen & Li, Chengjun & Zhao, Jun & Wu, Boyuan & Du, Yanping & Zhang, Jing & Zhu, Yilin, 2021. "The above-ground strategies to approach the goal of geothermal power generation in China: State of art and future researches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Youcef Redjeb & Khatima Kaabeche-Djerafi & Anna Stoppato & Alberto Benato, 2021. "The IRC-PD Tool: A Code to Design Steam and Organic Waste Heat Recovery Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-37, September.
    11. Wang, Shukun & Zhang, Lu & Liu, Chao & Liu, Zuming & Lan, Song & Li, Qibin & Wang, Xiaonan, 2021. "Techno-economic-environmental evaluation of a combined cooling heating and power system for gas turbine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    12. Rivera Diaz, Alexandre & Kaya, Eylem & Zarrouk, Sadiq J., 2016. "Reinjection in geothermal fields − A worldwide review update," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 105-162.
    13. Lu, Xinli & Zhao, Yangyang & Zhu, Jialing & Zhang, Wei, 2018. "Optimization and applicability of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 128-141.
    14. Fan, Gang & Du, Yang & Li, Hang & Dai, Yiping, 2021. "Off-design behavior investigation of the combined supercritical CO2 and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    15. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. Cakici, Duygu Melek & Erdogan, Anil & Colpan, Can Ozgur, 2017. "Thermodynamic performance assessment of an integrated geothermal powered supercritical regenerative organic Rankine cycle and parabolic trough solar collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 306-319.
    17. Li, Zhouhang & Tang, Guoli & Wu, Yuxin & Zhai, Yuling & Xu, Jianxin & Wang, Hua & Lu, Junfu, 2016. "Improved gas heaters for supercritical CO2 Rankine cycles: Considerations on forced and mixed convection heat transfer enhancement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 126-141.
    18. Bu, Shujuan & Yang, Xinle & Li, Weikang & Su, Chang & Dai, Wenzhi & Wang, Xin & Liu, Xunan & Tang, Meiling, 2023. "Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, economic, and environmental analyses and multiobjective optimization of a SCMR–ORC system with zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    19. Peter Collings & Zhibin Yu, 2017. "Numerical Analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle with Adjustable Working Fluid Composition, a Volumetric Expander and a Recuperator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Fierro, José J. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Potential savings in the cement industry using waste heat recovery technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:1031-:d:1343850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.