IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i18p5611-d630714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The IRC-PD Tool: A Code to Design Steam and Organic Waste Heat Recovery Units

Author

Listed:
  • Youcef Redjeb

    (LGPDDPS Laboratory, Department of Process Engineering, National Polytechnic School of Constantine (ENPC), BP 75, Ali Mendjeli, Constantine 25000, Algeria)

  • Khatima Kaabeche-Djerafi

    (LGPDDPS Laboratory, Department of Process Engineering, National Polytechnic School of Constantine (ENPC), BP 75, Ali Mendjeli, Constantine 25000, Algeria)

  • Anna Stoppato

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Via Venezia 1, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Alberto Benato

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Via Venezia 1, 35131 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

The Algerian economy and electricity generation sector are strongly dependent on fossil fuels. Over 93% of Algerian exports are hydrocarbons, and approximately 90% of the generated electricity comes from natural gas power plants. However, Algeria is also a country with huge potential in terms of both renewable energy sources and industrial processes waste heat recovery. For these reasons, the government launched an ambitious program to foster renewable energy sources and industrial energy efficiency. In this context, steam and organic Rankine cycles could play a crucial role; however, there is a need for reliable and time-efficient optimization tools that take into account technical, economic, environmental, and safety aspects. For this purpose, the authors built a mathematical tool able to optimize both steam and organic Rankine units. The tool, called Improved Rankine Cycle Plant Designer, was developed in MATLAB environment, uses the Genetic Algorithm toolbox, acquires the fluids thermophysical properties from CoolProp and REFPROP databases, while the safety information is derived from the ASHRAE database. The tool, designed to support the development of both RES and industrial processes waste heat recovery, could perform single or multi-objective optimizations of the steam Rankine cycle layout and of a multiple set of organic Rankine cycle configurations, including the ones which adopt a water or an oil thermal loop. In the case of the ORC unit, the working fluid is selected among more than 120 pure fluids and their mixtures. The turbines’ design parameters and the adoption of a water- or an air-cooled condenser are also optimization results. To facilitate the plant layout and working fluid selection, the economic analysis is performed to better evaluate the plant economic feasibility after the thermodynamic optimization of the cycle. Considering the willingness of moving from a fossil to a RES-based economy, there is a need for adopting plants using low environmental impact working fluids. However, because ORC fluids are subjected to environmental and safety issues, as well as phase out, the code also computes the Total Equivalent Warming Impact, provides safety information using the ASHRAE database, and displays an alert if the organic substance is phased out or is going to be banned. To show the tool’s potentialities and improve the knowledge on waste heat recovery in bio-gas plants, the authors selected an in-operation facility in which the waste heat is released by a 1 MW el internal combustion engine as the test case. The optimization outcomes reveal that the technical, economic, environmental, and safety performance can be achieved adopting the organic Rankine cycle recuperative configuration. The unit, which adopts Benzene as working fluid, needs to be decoupled from the heat source by means of an oil thermal loop. This optimized solution guarantees to boost the electricity production of the bio-gas facility up to 15%.

Suggested Citation

  • Youcef Redjeb & Khatima Kaabeche-Djerafi & Anna Stoppato & Alberto Benato, 2021. "The IRC-PD Tool: A Code to Design Steam and Organic Waste Heat Recovery Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-37, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5611-:d:630714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martelli, Emanuele & Capra, Federico & Consonni, Stefano, 2015. "Numerical optimization of Combined Heat and Power Organic Rankine Cycles – Part A: Design optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 310-328.
    2. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Navid, P. & Blanco Marigorta, A.M. & Amidpour, M. & Hamedi, M.H., 2013. "New procedure for optimal design and evaluation of cogeneration system based on advanced exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 314-333.
    3. Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Jhan Piero Rojas & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2020. "Advance Exergo-Economic Analysis of a Waste Heat Recovery System Using ORC for a Bottoming Natural Gas Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Florian Heberle & Dieter Brüggemann, 2016. "Thermo-Economic Analysis of Zeotropic Mixtures and Pure Working Fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Chys, M. & van den Broek, M. & Vanslambrouck, B. & De Paepe, M., 2012. "Potential of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 623-632.
    6. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    7. Mirko Grljušić & Vladimir Medica & Gojmir Radica, 2015. "Calculation of Efficiencies of a Ship Power Plant Operating with Waste Heat Recovery through Combined Heat and Power Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Gullo, Paride & Tsamos, Konstantinos M. & Hafner, Armin & Banasiak, Krzysztof & Ge, Yunting T. & Tassou, Savvas A., 2018. "Crossing CO2 equator with the aid of multi-ejector concept: A comprehensive energy and environmental comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 236-263.
    9. Yıldız Koç & Hüseyin Yağlı & Ali Koç, 2019. "Exergy Analysis and Performance Improvement of a Subcritical/Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Exhaust Gas Waste Heat Recovery in a Biogas Fuelled Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Engine Thro," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    11. Nord, Lars O. & Martelli, Emanuele & Bolland, Olav, 2014. "Weight and power optimization of steam bottoming cycle for offshore oil and gas installations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 891-898.
    12. Gerber, Léda & Maréchal, François, 2012. "Environomic optimal configurations of geothermal energy conversion systems: Application to the future construction of Enhanced Geothermal Systems in Switzerland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 908-923.
    13. Akbi, Amine & Saber, Meryem & Aziza, Majda & Yassaa, Noureddine, 2017. "An overview of sustainable bioenergy potential in Algeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 240-245.
    14. Wang, E.H. & Zhang, H.G. & Fan, B.Y. & Ouyang, M.G. & Zhao, Y. & Mu, Q.H., 2011. "Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3406-3418.
    15. Malte Meinshausen & Nicolai Meinshausen & William Hare & Sarah C. B. Raper & Katja Frieler & Reto Knutti & David J. Frame & Myles R. Allen, 2009. "Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7242), pages 1158-1162, April.
    16. Vaja, Iacopo & Gambarotta, Agostino, 2010. "Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) bottoming with Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1084-1093.
    17. Jesper Graa Andreasen & Andrea Meroni & Fredrik Haglind, 2017. "A Comparison of Organic and Steam Rankine Cycle Power Systems for Waste Heat Recovery on Large Ships," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    18. Liu, Bo-Tau & Chien, Kuo-Hsiang & Wang, Chi-Chuan, 2004. "Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1207-1217.
    19. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2017. "Biogas Engine Waste Heat Recovery Using Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Song, Jian & Gu, Chun-wei, 2015. "Performance analysis of a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system with wet steam expansion for engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 280-289.
    21. Alireza Javanshir & Nenad Sarunac & Zahra Razzaghpanah, 2017. "Thermodynamic Analysis of ORC and Its Application for Waste Heat Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, October.
    22. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (organic Rankine cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part A: Thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 423-434.
    23. Capra, Federico & Martelli, Emanuele, 2015. "Numerical optimization of combined heat and power Organic Rankine Cycles – Part B: Simultaneous design & part-load optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 329-343.
    24. Collings, Peter & Yu, Zhibin & Wang, Enhua, 2016. "A dynamic organic Rankine cycle using a zeotropic mixture as the working fluid with composition tuning to match changing ambient conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-591.
    25. Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn & Wei, Haiqiao & Liang, Xingyu & Liu, Lina, 2012. "Fluids and parameters optimization for the organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) used in exhaust heat recovery of Internal Combustion Engine (ICE)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 125-136.
    26. Freeman, James & Hellgardt, Klaus & Markides, Christos N., 2017. "Working fluid selection and electrical performance optimisation of a domestic solar-ORC combined heat and power system for year-round operation in the UK," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 291-303.
    27. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 435-446.
    28. DeLovato, Nicolas & Sundarnath, Kavin & Cvijovic, Lazar & Kota, Krishna & Kuravi, Sarada, 2019. "A review of heat recovery applications for solar and geothermal power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    29. Li, Jing & Li, Pengcheng & Pei, Gang & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Analysis of a novel solar electricity generation system using cascade Rankine cycle and steam screw expander," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 627-638.
    30. Pierobon, L. & Benato, A. & Scolari, E. & Haglind, F. & Stoppato, A., 2014. "Waste heat recovery technologies for offshore platforms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 228-241.
    31. Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Paci, Marco, 2014. "A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 219-232.
    32. Leonardo Pierobon & Tuong-Van Nguyen & Andrea Mazzucco & Ulrik Larsen & Fredrik Haglind, 2014. "Part-Load Performance of aWet Indirectly Fired Gas Turbine Integrated with an Organic Rankine Cycle Turbogenerator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-23, December.
    33. Ye, Zhenhong & Yang, Jingye & Shi, Junye & Chen, Jiangping, 2020. "Thermo-economic and environmental analysis of various low-GWP refrigerants in Organic Rankine cycle system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    34. Shu, Gequn & Gao, Yuanyuan & Tian, Hua & Wei, Haiqiao & Liang, Xingyu, 2014. "Study of mixtures based on hydrocarbons used in ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 428-438.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiara Martini & Claudia Toro, 2022. "Special Issue “Industry and Tertiary Sectors towards Clean Energy Transition”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-5, June.
    2. Wanming Pan & Junkang Li & Guotao Zhang & Le Zhou & Ming Tu, 2022. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Tractor Waste Heat Recovery Based on Particle Swarm Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2017. "Biogas Engine Waste Heat Recovery Using Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    3. Hoang, Anh Tuan, 2018. "Waste heat recovery from diesel engines based on Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 138-166.
    4. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    5. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2016. "Economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system with lower global warming potential working fluids in geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1201-1213.
    6. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    7. Scaccabarozzi, Roberto & Tavano, Michele & Invernizzi, Costante Mario & Martelli, Emanuele, 2018. "Comparison of working fluids and cycle optimization for heat recovery ORCs from large internal combustion engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 396-416.
    8. Meroni, Andrea & Andreasen, Jesper Graa & Persico, Giacomo & Haglind, Fredrik, 2018. "Optimization of organic Rankine cycle power systems considering multistage axial turbine design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 339-354.
    9. Jesper Graa Andreasen & Martin Ryhl Kærn & Fredrik Haglind, 2019. "Assessment of Methods for Performance Comparison of Pure and Zeotropic Working Fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, May.
    10. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    11. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    12. Magdalena Santos-Rodriguez, M. & Flores-Tlacuahuac, Antonio & Zavala, Victor M., 2017. "A stochastic optimization approach for the design of organic fluid mixtures for low-temperature heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 145-159.
    13. Yang, Fubin & Cho, Heejin & Zhang, Hongguang & Zhang, Jian, 2017. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for CNG engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1100-1118.
    14. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    15. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Zhang, Tao & Ma, Junhua & Zhou, Yanglin & Wang, Yongzhen & Chen, Qifang & Li, Xiaoping & Liu, Liuchen, 2021. "Thermo-economic analysis and optimization of ICE-ORC systems based on a splitter regulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    17. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    18. Vivian, Jacopo & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2015. "A general framework to select working fluid and configuration of ORCs for low-to-medium temperature heat sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 727-746.
    19. Jesper G. Andreasen & Martin R. Kærn & Leonardo Pierobon & Ulrik Larsen & Fredrik Haglind, 2016. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plants Using Pure and Mixed Working Fluids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Alvin Kiprono Bett & Saeid Jalilinasrabady, 2021. "Optimization of ORC Power Plants for Geothermal Application in Kenya by Combining Exergy and Pinch Point Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5611-:d:630714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.