IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i4p793-d1334845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental and Economic Benefits Induced by a Remanufactured Portable Power Station

Author

Listed:
  • Soo Jin Yang

    (Program in Circular Economy Environmental System, Inha University, 100, Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea
    Ecoeye Co., 70, Dusan-ro, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul 08584, Republic of Korea)

  • Yong Woo Hwang

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Inha University, 100, Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea)

  • Young Woon Kim

    (Program in Circular Economy Environmental System, Inha University, 100, Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea)

  • Mi Sook Park

    (Program in Circular Economy Environmental System, Inha University, 100, Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea
    National Institute of Green Technology, 60, Yeouinaru-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07328, Republic of Korea)

  • Jun Hee Nam

    (GOODBYECAR Corp., 77-24, Samil-ro, Gwangjeok-myeon, Yangju-si 11414, Republic of Korea)

  • Hong Yoon Kang

    (Program in Circular Economy Environmental System, Inha University, 100, Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The recent announcement by the European Union of the Fit for 55 Package and a prospective ban on the sale of new internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035 has prompted a notable surge in the electric vehicle (EV) market. The shift toward EVs concurrently presents challenges, namely the resource management of used EV batteries, particularly their reuse, recycling, and remanufacturing. Accordingly, this study aims to analyze the effects of the reduced environmental impacts of a remanufactured portable power station (RPPS) compared with those of a new portable power station (NPPS) using life cycle assessment (LCA) and the economic benefits gained from reusing used EV batteries. The results of the LCA of the RPPS indicated a notable environmental advantage, with reductions of 42.01% in GWP and 41.91% in ADP compared with those achieved by the NPPS. Moreover, the economic benefits of the waste battery remanufacturing business amounted to USD 593,212 at an annual sales volume of 1000 units. The environmental benefits of remanufacturing practices represent valuable support for policies centered on remanufacturing and reusing used EV batteries. The findings of this study could stimulate a future market for products repurposed from used EV batteries, thereby further fostering sustainability in this sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Soo Jin Yang & Yong Woo Hwang & Young Woon Kim & Mi Sook Park & Jun Hee Nam & Hong Yoon Kang, 2024. "Environmental and Economic Benefits Induced by a Remanufactured Portable Power Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:793-:d:1334845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/4/793/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/4/793/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Han, Xiaojuan & Liang, Yubo & Ai, Yaoyao & Li, Jianlin, 2018. "Economic evaluation of a PV combined energy storage charging station based on cost estimation of second-use batteries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 326-339.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duan, Ditao & Poursoleiman, Roza, 2021. "Modified teaching-learning-based optimization by orthogonal learning for optimal design of an electric vehicle charging station," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Zhou, Yuekuan & Cao, Sunliang & Hensen, Jan L.M., 2021. "An energy paradigm transition framework from negative towards positive district energy sharing networks—Battery cycling aging, advanced battery management strategies, flexible vehicles-to-buildings in," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    3. Liu, Jia & Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Li, Yutong, 2020. "Energy storage and management system design optimization for a photovoltaic integrated low-energy building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. Yi, Tao & Cheng, Xiaobin & Chen, Yaxuan & Liu, Jinpeng, 2020. "Joint optimization of charging station and energy storage economic capacity based on the effect of alternative energy storage of electric vehicle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    5. Kang, Hyuna & Jung, Seunghoon & Kim, Hakpyeong & An, Jongbaek & Hong, Juwon & Yeom, Seungkeun & Hong, Taehoon, 2025. "Life-cycle environmental impacts of reused batteries of electric vehicles in buildings considering battery uncertainty," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    6. Zhang, Mingye & Yang, Min & Gao, Yangfan, 2024. "Tripartite evolutionary game and simulation analysis of electric bus charging facility sharing under the governmental reward and punishment mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    7. Zhang, Junxia & Li, Xingmei & Jia, Dongqing & Zhou, Yuexin, 2023. "A Bi-level programming for union battery swapping stations location-routing problem under joint distribution and cost allocation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    8. Meng, Jinhao & Cai, Lei & Stroe, Daniel-Ioan & Ma, Junpeng & Luo, Guangzhao & Teodorescu, Remus, 2020. "An optimized ensemble learning framework for lithium-ion Battery State of Health estimation in energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    9. Zhang, Youlang & Li, Yan & Tao, Yibin & Ye, Jilei & Pan, Aiqiang & Li, Xinzhou & Liao, Qiangqiang & Wang, Zhiqin, 2020. "Performance assessment of retired EV battery modules for echelon use," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Liu, Zhengguang & Guo, Zhiling & Song, Chenchen & Du, Ying & Chen, Qi & Chen, Yuntian & Zhang, Haoran, 2023. "Business model comparison of slum-based PV to realize low-cost and flexible power generation in city-level," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    11. Hassan, Masood Ul & Saha, Sajeeb & Haque, Md Enamul, 2021. "PVAnalytX: A MATLAB toolkit for techno-economic analysis and performance evaluation of rooftop PV systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Damir Jakus & Josip Vasilj & Danijel Jolevski, 2023. "Optimal Electric Vehicle Parking Lot Energy Supply Based on Mixed-Integer Linear Programming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-25, November.
    13. Rafael G. Nagel & Vitor Fernão Pires & Jony L. Silveira & Armando Cordeiro & Daniel Foito, 2023. "Financial Analysis of Household Photovoltaic Self-Consumption in the Context of the Vehicle-to-Home ( V2H ) in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Mazzeo, Domenico, 2019. "Nocturnal electric vehicle charging interacting with a residential photovoltaic-battery system: a 3E (energy, economic and environmental) analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 310-331.
    15. Zhou, Yuekuan & Liu, Xiaohua & Zhao, Qianchuan, 2024. "A stochastic vehicle schedule model for demand response and grid flexibility in a renewable-building-e-transportation-microgrid," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    16. Zhang, Mingze & Li, Weidong & Yu, Samson Shenglong & Wen, Kerui & Zhou, Chen & Shi, Peng, 2021. "A unified configurational optimization framework for battery swapping and charging stations considering electric vehicle uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    17. Wu, Wei & Lin, Boqiang & Xie, Chunping & Elliott, Robert J.R. & Radcliffe, Jonathan, 2020. "Does energy storage provide a profitable second life for electric vehicle batteries?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. Zhang, Huiming & Huang, Jiying & Hu, Ruohan & Zhou, Dequn & Khan, Haroon ur Rashid & Ma, Changxian, 2020. "Echelon utilization of waste power batteries in new energy vehicles: Review of Chinese policies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    19. Lei Zhang & Yingqi Liu & Beibei Pang & Bingxiang Sun & Ari Kokko, 2020. "Second Use Value of China’s New Energy Vehicle Battery: A View Based on Multi-Scenario Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
    20. Bai, Bo & Xiong, Siqin & Song, Bo & Xiaoming, Ma, 2019. "Economic analysis of distributed solar photovoltaics with reused electric vehicle batteries as energy storage systems in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 213-229.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:793-:d:1334845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.