IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i18p4621-d1478515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Energy Contributions of Different Types of Ground Heat Exchangers Related to Cost in a Working Ground Source Heat Pump System

Author

Listed:
  • Christakis Christou

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering and Informatics, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3036, Cyprus)

  • Iosifina I. Stylianou

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering and Informatics, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3036, Cyprus)

  • Lazaros Aresti

    (Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3036, Cyprus)

  • Georgios A. Florides

    (Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3036, Cyprus)

  • Paul Christodoulides

    (Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3036, Cyprus)

Abstract

Geothermal systems face adoption challenges due to their high initial investment cost. Accurate cost analyses and a more precise understanding of updated prices could assist geothermal industry projects in obtaining investment financing and better money management with the right equipment. As the cost of geothermal installations can vary widely depending on case and location, it seems essential to clarify the factors and parameters that determine the cost of the system. These include the type of loop system, the ground conditions, the type of heat pump, the system size, and the geographical location. The scope of this study is to compare the operation of various types of ground heat exchangers (GHEs) present in a Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) system installed in the coastal area of the Mediterranean climate zone of Cyprus. The highlight of this work is that it presents real installation cost data as well as recorded total energy contributed by the GHEs to the GSHP system of a HP cooling and heating capacities of 101 kW and 117 kW, respectively. The input contribution from the GHEs to the HP is 85,650 kWh (308,340 MJ) in summer and 25,880 kWh (93,168 MJ) in winter. It is shown that, among the three groups of GHEs investigated, the open-well GHE complex has the lowest cost per kWh ratio (0.32 EUR/kWh), followed by the vertical GHE complex (1.05 EUR/kWh), and lastly by the helical coil GHE (2.77 EUR/kWh). This clearly suggests that when underground water is available, the open-well GHE is much more favorable than other GHE types.

Suggested Citation

  • Christakis Christou & Iosifina I. Stylianou & Lazaros Aresti & Georgios A. Florides & Paul Christodoulides, 2024. "Comparison of the Energy Contributions of Different Types of Ground Heat Exchangers Related to Cost in a Working Ground Source Heat Pump System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:18:p:4621-:d:1478515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/18/4621/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/18/4621/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gharibi, Shabnam & Mortezazadeh, Emad & Hashemi Aghcheh Bodi, Seyed Jalaledin & Vatani, Ali, 2018. "Feasibility study of geothermal heat extraction from abandoned oil wells using a U-tube heat exchanger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 554-567.
    2. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    3. Self, Stuart J. & Reddy, Bale V. & Rosen, Marc A., 2013. "Geothermal heat pump systems: Status review and comparison with other heating options," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 341-348.
    4. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Yu, Chao & Shi, Yu & Song, Guofeng & Xu, Fuqiang & Ji, Jiayan & Song, Zihao, 2022. "Heat extraction study of a novel hydrothermal open-loop geothermal system in a multi-lateral horizontal well," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Lee, C.K., 2011. "Effects of multiple ground layers on thermal response test analysis and ground-source heat pump simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4405-4410.
    6. Bandos, Tatyana V. & Campos-Celador, Álvaro & López-González, Luis M. & Sala-Lizarraga, José M., 2014. "Finite cylinder-source model for energy pile heat exchangers: Effects of thermal storage and vertical temperature variations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 639-648.
    7. Cui, Ping & Li, Xin & Man, Yi & Fang, Zhaohong, 2011. "Heat transfer analysis of pile geothermal heat exchangers with spiral coils," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4113-4119.
    8. Lu, Qi & Narsilio, Guillermo A. & Aditya, Gregorius Riyan & Johnston, Ian W., 2017. "Economic analysis of vertical ground source heat pump systems in Melbourne," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 107-117.
    9. Yang, Weibo & Shi, Mingheng & Liu, Guangyuan & Chen, Zhenqian, 2009. "A two-region simulation model of vertical U-tube ground heat exchanger and its experimental verification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(10), pages 2005-2012, October.
    10. Silvia Cocchi & Sonia Castellucci & Andrea Tucci, 2013. "Modeling of an Air Conditioning System with Geothermal Heat Pump for a Residential Building," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-6, February.
    11. Wood, Christopher J. & Liu, Hao & Riffat, Saffa B., 2010. "An investigation of the heat pump performance and ground temperature of a piled foundation heat exchanger system for a residential building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4932-4940.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piotr Krawczyk & Krzysztof Badyda & Aleksandra Dzido, 2025. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Increasing the Share of Renewable Energy Sources in Heat Generation Using the Example of a Medium-Sized City in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Somogyi, Viola & Sebestyén, Viktor & Nagy, Georgina, 2017. "Scientific achievements and regulation of shallow geothermal systems in six European countries – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 934-952.
    2. Sorranat Ratchawang & Srilert Chotpantarat & Sasimook Chokchai & Isao Takashima & Youhei Uchida & Punya Charusiri, 2022. "A Review of Ground Source Heat Pump Application for Space Cooling in Southeast Asia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Cui, Yuanlong & Zhu, Jie & Twaha, Ssennoga & Riffat, Saffa, 2018. "A comprehensive review on 2D and 3D models of vertical ground heat exchangers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 84-114.
    4. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    5. Li, Min & Lai, Alvin C.K., 2015. "Review of analytical models for heat transfer by vertical ground heat exchangers (GHEs): A perspective of time and space scales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 178-191.
    6. Carotenuto, Alberto & Ciccolella, Michela & Massarotti, Nicola & Mauro, Alessandro, 2016. "Models for thermo-fluid dynamic phenomena in low enthalpy geothermal energy systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 330-355.
    7. Self, Stuart J. & Reddy, Bale V. & Rosen, Marc A., 2013. "Geothermal heat pump systems: Status review and comparison with other heating options," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 341-348.
    8. Shen, Junhao & Luo, Yongqiang & Zhou, Chaohui & Song, Yixiao & Tian, Zhiyong & Fan, Jianhua & Zhang, Ling & Liu, Aihua, 2025. "A slightly inclined deep borehole heat exchanger array behaves better than vertical installation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    9. Weidong Lyu & Hefu Pu & Jiannan (Nick) Chen, 2020. "Thermal Performance of an Energy Pile Group with a Deeply Penetrating U-Shaped Heat Exchanger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Liu, Songze & Wang, Ming, 2023. "Heat extraction performance evaluation of U-shaped well geothermal production system under different well-layout parameters and engineering schemes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 473-484.
    11. Jeongyoon Oh & Taehoon Hong & Hakpyeong Kim & Jongbaek An & Kwangbok Jeong & Choongwan Koo, 2017. "Advanced Strategies for Net-Zero Energy Building: Focused on the Early Phase and Usage Phase of a Building’s Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-52, December.
    12. Zhao, Qiang & Chen, Baoming & Tian, Maocheng & Liu, Fang, 2018. "Investigation on the thermal behavior of energy piles and borehole heat exchangers: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 787-797.
    13. Ioan Sarbu & Calin Sebarchievici, 2016. "Performance Evaluation of Radiator and Radiant Floor Heating Systems for an Office Room Connected to a Ground-Coupled Heat Pump," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Sihan Zhou & Lijie Zhu & Runan Wan & Tao Zhang & Yongzheng Zhang & Yi Zhan & Fang Wang & Linfeng Zhang & Tian You, 2023. "An Overview of Sandbox Experiment on Ground Heat Exchangers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-39, July.
    15. Hu, Jinzhong, 2017. "An improved analytical model for vertical borehole ground heat exchanger with multiple-layer substrates and groundwater flow," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 537-549.
    16. Bandos, Tatyana V. & Campos-Celador, Álvaro & López-González, Luis M. & Sala-Lizarraga, José M., 2014. "Finite cylinder-source model for energy pile heat exchangers: Effects of thermal storage and vertical temperature variations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 639-648.
    17. Ma, Zhenjun & Xia, Lei & Gong, Xuemei & Kokogiannakis, Georgios & Wang, Shugang & Zhou, Xinlei, 2020. "Recent advances and development in optimal design and control of ground source heat pump systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Walmsley, Timothy Gordon & Philipp, Matthias & Picón-Núñez, Martín & Meschede, Henning & Taylor, Matthew Thomas & Schlosser, Florian & Atkins, Martin John, 2023. "Hybrid renewable energy utility systems for industrial sites: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    19. Jeon, Jun-Seo & Lee, Seung-Rae & Kim, Min-Jun, 2018. "A modified mathematical model for spiral coil-type horizontal ground heat exchangers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 732-743.
    20. Ioan Sarbu & Calin Sebarchievici, 2020. "Exploratory Research to Improve Energy-Efficiency of a Ground-Coupled Heat Pump Utilizing an Automatic Control Device of Circulation Pump Speed," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:18:p:4621-:d:1478515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.