IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i13p3138-d1422135.html

Hydrodynamic Development and Optimisation of a Retrofittable Dual-Mode Propeller Turbine

Author

Listed:
  • Joylan Rao Erriah

    (School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

  • Pengfei Liu

    (School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

  • Serkan Turkmen

    (School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

Abstract

Dual-mode propellers, as propulsion and turbine devices, have found widespread application in renewable energy systems for marine vehicles, particularly in sailing boats and yachts. However, the existing dual-mode propellers in these contexts are typically chosen in an off-the-shelf manner, indicating a lack of hydrodynamic optimisation to enhance both the propulsion and energy generation efficiency in the same rotor. To address this limitation and furnish scientific validation of the design of a dual-mode propeller turbine rotor optimised to achieve a balanced performance in both propulsion and energy generation, rigorous experimentation was conducted using specialised software, Rotorysics 2019, and a case study vessel, the Princess Royale. Utilising prior experimental data for this propeller turbine, code validation was undertaken to ensure accurate prediction of the effects of the pitch, blade count and expanded area ratio on the performance in both modes. With the intention of achieving optimal power generation and propulsion efficiencies in conjunction with a single rotor, the findings reveal that the optimised fixed-pitch propeller exhibits dual functionality. They serve as both propulsion and tidal/current turbines with balanced efficiency. They are particularly suitable for low-speed vessels such as yachts anchored in currents or for sailboats utilising a propeller as a towed turbine. Through thorough testing and analysis, the concept of a dual-mode propeller turbine was feasible. Analysing them separately, in terms of the propulsion, the best geometry found through numerous tests of different expanded area ratios, blade number, pitch and speed was the 3-blade, 0.6 pitch ratio, which achieved a propulsive efficiency of 54.33% (0.5433204) and a power coefficient of 0.291843. Conversely, if the focus was on power generation while maintaining excellent propulsive efficiency, the optimal geometry would be the 5-blade, 0.6 pitch ratio, which offers a power coefficient of 0.348402 and a propulsive efficiency of 48.55% (0.48547). However, when using both power generation and propulsion as the criteria, the 5-blade, 0.6 pitch ratio, with an EAR of 0.387142, is superior, with balanced optimisation, offering a propulsive efficiency of 52.53% (0.52527) and a power coefficient of 0.319718. As expected, this encompasses a higher blade number for increased power generation efficiency and a higher pitch ratio for increased propulsive efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Joylan Rao Erriah & Pengfei Liu & Serkan Turkmen, 2024. "Hydrodynamic Development and Optimisation of a Retrofittable Dual-Mode Propeller Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3138-:d:1422135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Pengfei, 2010. "A computational hydrodynamics method for horizontal axis turbine – Panel method modeling migration from propulsion to turbine energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 2843-2851.
    2. Bahaj, A.S. & Molland, A.F. & Chaplin, J.R. & Batten, W.M.J., 2007. "Power and thrust measurements of marine current turbines under various hydrodynamic flow conditions in a cavitation tunnel and a towing tank," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 407-426.
    3. Gu, Ya-jing & Lin, Yong-gang & Xu, Quan-kun & Liu, Hong-wei & Li, Wei, 2018. "Blade-pitch system for tidal current turbines with reduced variation pitch control strategy based on tidal current velocity preview," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 149-158.
    4. Liu, Pengfei & Bose, Neil & Chen, Keqiang & Xu, Yiyi, 2018. "Development and optimization of dual-mode propellers for renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 566-576.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Pengfei & Veitch, Brian, 2012. "Design and optimization for strength and integrity of tidal turbine rotor blades," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 393-404.
    2. Tian, Wenlong & VanZwieten, James H. & Pyakurel, Parakram & Li, Yanjun, 2016. "Influences of yaw angle and turbulence intensity on the performance of a 20 kW in-stream hydrokinetic turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 104-116.
    3. Liu, Penfei & Bose, Neil & Frost, Rowan & Macfarlane, Gregor & Lilienthal, Tim & Penesis, Irene & Windsor, Fraser & Thomas, Giles, 2014. "Model testing of a series of bi-directional tidal turbine rotors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 397-410.
    4. Ahmadian, Reza & Falconer, Roger A., 2012. "Assessment of array shape of tidal stream turbines on hydro-environmental impacts and power output," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 318-327.
    5. Ramos, V. & Carballo, R. & Álvarez, M. & Sánchez, M. & Iglesias, G., 2013. "Assessment of the impacts of tidal stream energy through high-resolution numerical modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 541-554.
    6. Teng, Yiming & Hu, Dewen & Wu, Feng & Zhang, Ridong & Gao, Furong, 2020. "Fast economic model predictive control for marine current turbine generator system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 108-116.
    7. Li, Wei & Zhou, Hongbin & Liu, Hongwei & Lin, Yonggang & Xu, Quankun, 2016. "Review on the blade design technologies of tidal current turbine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 414-422.
    8. Ramos, V. & Carballo, R. & Álvarez, M. & Sánchez, M. & Iglesias, G., 2014. "A port towards energy self-sufficiency using tidal stream power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 432-444.
    9. Nachtane, M. & Tarfaoui, M. & Goda, I. & Rouway, M., 2020. "A review on the technologies, design considerations and numerical models of tidal current turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1274-1288.
    10. Liang, Darong & Wu, Baigong & Shu, Yongdong & Zhou, Zhenhu & Zhang, Xiao & Chen, Jianmei & Zhu, Wanqiang & Ji, Qingshan, 2024. "Structural optimization and performance investigation of power flow adaptive flow devices based on multi-body coupling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    11. Liu, Pengfei & Bose, Neil, 2012. "Prototyping a series of bi-directional horizontal axis tidal turbines for optimum energy conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 50-66.
    12. Liu, Pengfei & Bose, Neil & Chen, Keqiang & Xu, Yiyi, 2018. "Development and optimization of dual-mode propellers for renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 566-576.
    13. Moreau, Martin & Germain, Grégory & Maurice, Guillaume, 2023. "Experimental performance and wake study of a ducted twin vertical axis turbine in ebb and flood tide currents at a 1/20th scale," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 318-333.
    14. Qian, Peng & Feng, Bo & Liu, Hao & Tian, Xiange & Si, Yulin & Zhang, Dahai, 2019. "Review on configuration and control methods of tidal current turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 125-139.
    15. Wang, Zixuan & Wei, Zhijun & Liu, Peng & Chen, Jinlong & Zhang, Ningchuan, 2026. "Wind speed correction under thrust similarity for an 18-MW FOWT: A wind-tunnel study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    16. Liu, Pengfei, 2015. "WIG (wing-in-ground) effect dual-foil turbine for high renewable energy performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 366-378.
    17. Vinod, Ashwin & Han, Cong & Banerjee, Arindam, 2021. "Tidal turbine performance and near-wake characteristics in a sheared turbulent inflow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 840-852.
    18. Goundar, Jai N. & Ahmed, M. Rafiuddin, 2014. "Marine current energy resource assessment and design of a marine current turbine for Fiji," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 14-22.
    19. Li, Binghui & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo & DeCarolis, Joseph F. & Bane, John & He, Ruoying & Keeler, Andrew G. & Neary, Vincent S., 2017. "The economics of electricity generation from Gulf Stream currents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 649-658.
    20. Liu, Hong-wei & Ma, Shun & Li, Wei & Gu, Hai-gang & Lin, Yong-gang & Sun, Xiao-jing, 2011. "A review on the development of tidal current energy in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 1141-1146, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3138-:d:1422135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.